That Which Already Has Been
Lecture catalog #108 — text: HAVE
Date (happened)
6 October 1959
conclusion
Why
dc1-agreement-20261004, pm-actor-551 (PM 8702)
Reasoning
All 2 claims agree on 1959-10-06: Neville lectures catalog #108; node:1062.
6 October 1959
stated · preferred
Source
Neville lectures catalog #108
6 October 1959
stated
Why
M7 dating pass (529; 525's readers, packet 049)
Reasoning
Same title as node 1062, certainly dated there at 1959-10-06; the catalog claim was circularly copied from that node's now-refuted guess.
13 October 1968
stated · refuted
Source
Neville lectures catalog #477
Reasoning
Lowered to `doubtful` under the #2461 §1(b) extension of the #2435 standing rule. The fenced lecture that carried this date, nid 1062 "That Which Already Has Been", has had its claim at 1968-10-13 REFUTED, and no fenced lecture holds the date, so the assertion retains no support. This event cites that same node in field_sources (1062), so its support is circular: its only witness is a claim the corpus has withdrawn. ⛔ NOT `refuted`, deliberately: what was disproved is that THIS LECTURE was delivered on this day, NOT that Neville lectured that day at all — he spoke far more often than the surviving transcripts record. Refuting would assert the day did not happen, which nobody showed. Lowering withdraws the false confidence and keeps the day visible as calendar supply.