The Law

Lecture catalog #113 — text: HAVE

Date (happened)
20 November 1959
unresolved
  1. 20 November 1959 stated · preferred
    Source Neville lectures catalog #113
  2. 12 February 1965 stated · doubtful
    Source Neville lectures catalog #260
    Reasoning || v1.1/l7/propagate-node-refutation: lowered `certain` -> `doubtful` under A-121. THE CONTRADICTION: node 2067, the lecture this claim was copied to, holds the identical date 1965-02-12 as REFUTED, and records why — "Copied without semantic change from linked historical event 259. || v1.1/l2/w2: Pass-0-removed chrome dateline reads 'Neville Goddard 11-20-1959', which matches this node's own separate catalog #113 claim exactly and contradicts this claim's year, month and day entirely. || v1.1/l7/apply/c1: refuted by L7 adjudication ". A delivery date refuted on the lecture cannot stand as `certain` on the lecture event it was copied from. ⛔ Lowered only, never refuted: A-121's floor is `doubtful`, and nothing here is deleted — the date, its type, its source note and the prior confidence (certain) all survive, so this reverses from the ledger.
  3. 12 February 1965 stated · probable
    Source The Law
    Why M7 dating pass (529; 525's readers, packet 018)
    Reasoning Catalogue #260 belongs to node 1852, delivered 1965-02-12 (probable).
  4. 5 March 1971 stated · refuted
    Source Neville lectures catalog #650
    Reasoning Lowered to `doubtful` under the #2461 §1(b) extension of the #2435 standing rule. The fenced lecture that carried this date, nid 2067 "The Law", has had its claim at 1971-03-05 REFUTED, and no fenced lecture holds the date, so the assertion retains no support. This event cites that same node in field_sources (2067), so its support is circular: its only witness is a claim the corpus has withdrawn. ⛔ NOT `refuted`, deliberately: what was disproved is that THIS LECTURE was delivered on this day, NOT that Neville lectured that day at all — he spoke far more often than the surviving transcripts record. Refuting would assert the day did not happen, which nobody showed. Lowering withdraws the false confidence and keeps the day visible as calendar supply.
  5. 20 November 1959 stated · refuted
    Source The LawLecture nid 2067 has recovered chrome dateline 'Neville Goddard 11-20-1959'.
    Why pm-actor-525: refuted by the M7 dating pass (529; 525's readers, packet 018): Sourced from node 2067, which is catalog #113's lecture (correctly dated there); the carrier-repair note confirms catalog #260 belongs to the distinct node 1852.
    Reasoning The whole node packet identifies the dash-form site byline as delivery chrome and reads it in month-day-year form as 20 November 1959. It matches catalog #113 and contradicts event 259's inherited 1965-02-12 date as well as the other shared-node 1971 claim.
Persons
Sources

Source

  • The Law (lecture record (catalog #113))
  • The Law (lecture record (catalog #650))
  • The Law (lecture record (catalog #260))
Transcripts