12 February 1965
stated · doubtful
Source
Neville lectures catalog #260
Reasoning
|| v1.1/l7/propagate-node-refutation: lowered `certain` -> `doubtful` under A-121. THE CONTRADICTION: node 2067, the lecture this claim was copied to, holds the identical date 1965-02-12 as REFUTED, and records why — "Copied without semantic change from linked historical event 259. || v1.1/l2/w2: Pass-0-removed chrome dateline reads 'Neville Goddard 11-20-1959', which matches this node's own separate catalog #113 claim exactly and contradicts this claim's year, month and day entirely. || v1.1/l7/apply/c1: refuted by L7 adjudication ". A delivery date refuted on the lecture cannot stand as `certain` on the lecture event it was copied from. ⛔ Lowered only, never refuted: A-121's floor is `doubtful`, and nothing here is deleted — the date, its type, its source note and the prior confidence (certain) all survive, so this reverses from the ledger.