Autobiographical memory recalled by Neville in his lectures. Year derived: stated by Neville: 1929. Told 1 time (1971). Judged his own (not a retold third-party story) by the whose_age adjudication.
Date (happened)
between June 1929 and August 1929
unresolved
between June 1929 and August 1929
stated · preferred
1929
stated · probable
Source
phase-2 canonical event (fingerprint references)
c. 1929
stated
Source
stated by Neville: 1929 (1 statement, told 1968)
c. 1929
stated
Source
stated by Neville: 1929 (1 statement, told 1969)
-
-
-
between 1929 and 1959
stated · probable
Show all 53 claims
-
c. 1929
stated · probable
Source
"this month back in 1929", told in Drugs Dope Marijuana Lsd Alcohol Vegetarianism Etc (nid 2001)
-
1929
stated
Source
"back in 1929", told in Wake Up, There Is No Death Law Of Assumption Full Lecture (nid 2178)
c. 1929
stated · probable
-
between 1929 and 15 September 1967
stated
before 20 September 1966
bound
Reasoning
Retrospective passage P526509; non-preferred before bound.
1929
stated
Source
"Since that day back in 1929", told in Awake O' Sleeper (nid 1318)
between 1959 and 1968
stated · probable
-
-
1929
stated
Source
"back in 1929", told in The Invisible You (Unresolved ASR Witness) (nid 3988)
between 1929 and 1930
estimated · possible
Why
This is a first, earlier meeting distinct from the fuller 1959 understanding/awakening described in the same passage.
Reasoning
The relative expression here is anchored not to this lecture's own 1965 delivery date but to an internally-stated year within the same passage, 1959 (his well-established spiritual awakening, elsewhere confirmed across this corpus). 'Almost thirty years prior to' 1959 gives circa 1929-1930; written as a between range because 'almost thirty' is imprecise as to whether it means 27, 28, or 29 years.
between 19 February 1925 and 18 February 1935
relative · possible
Reasoning
hist_event 950 gives a certain 1905-02-19 birth date; 'a lad in my twenties' bounds this vision between his twentieth and thirtieth birthdays.
1929
stated
Source
passage 555951 (lecture nid 2301, 'All Things Are Possible'), 'In 1929, believing Jesus Christ to be another, I stood in His presence... I was incorporated into His body'
Why
The same passage places a second experience ('David... exploded from within and called me father') thirty years later, i.e. circa 1959; that is a separate event and not addressed here.
Reasoning
Neville states directly and unambiguously that the incorporation experience took place in 1929; this is his own first-person account of the event itself, not a reference to some other happening, so it stands as a stated claim rather than the estimated/title-derived claim already on file.
before 1963
bound · possible
Reasoning
Qualifying passage ids [530636] belong to telling lecture nids [1116]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1963 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1963 is the MIN across telling lectures.
before 8 December 1963
bound
Why
Tightens the phase4 L6a envelope from before 1963 to before 1963-12-08.
Reasoning
L6a envelope tightened to the telling day of nid 1116 (certain delivery 1963-12-08); same premise, finer precision. The phase4 L6a bound on this event is `before 1963`, an envelope over delivery YEARS computed without reading text. Its premise is that the fact is true by the time it is told; on that same premise the DAY of the telling is a strictly better upper bound. Nothing is re-decided — the bound is stated to the precision the evidence always supported. The delivery claim for 1963-12-08 on nid 1116 is held at `certain` by the corpus, which is what carries this claim. #2274; the L6a row stands beside this one.
before 1963
bound · possible
Reasoning
Qualifying passage ids [530692] belong to telling lecture nids [1117]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1963 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1963 is the MIN across telling lectures.
before 12 December 1963
bound
Why
Tightens the phase4 L6a envelope from before 1963 to before 1963-12-12.
Reasoning
L6a envelope tightened to the telling day of nid 1117 (certain delivery 1963-12-12); same premise, finer precision. The phase4 L6a bound on this event is `before 1963`, an envelope over delivery YEARS computed without reading text. Its premise is that the fact is true by the time it is told; on that same premise the DAY of the telling is a strictly better upper bound. Nothing is re-decided — the bound is stated to the precision the evidence always supported. The delivery claim for 1963-12-12 on nid 1117 is held at `certain` by the corpus, which is what carries this claim. #2274; the L6a row stands beside this one.
before 1964
bound · possible
Reasoning
Qualifying passage ids [531725] belong to telling lecture nids [1160]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1964 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1964 is the MIN across telling lectures.
before 21 April 1964
bound
Why
Tightens the phase4 L6a envelope from before 1964 to before 1964-04-21.
Reasoning
L6a envelope tightened to the telling day of nid 1160 (certain delivery 1964-04-21); same premise, finer precision. The phase4 L6a bound on this event is `before 1964`, an envelope over delivery YEARS computed without reading text. Its premise is that the fact is true by the time it is told; on that same premise the DAY of the telling is a strictly better upper bound. Nothing is re-decided — the bound is stated to the precision the evidence always supported. The delivery claim for 1964-04-21 on nid 1160 is held at `certain` by the corpus, which is what carries this claim. #2274; the L6a row stands beside this one.
before 21 April 1964
bound · probable
Reasoning
The passage frames the event as completed before Neville recounts it. Node 1160 supplies an uncorroborated legacy date of 1964-04-21, limiting the before bound to probable.
before 1967
bound · possible
Reasoning
Qualifying passage ids [535175] belong to telling lecture nids [1262]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1967 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1967 is the MIN across telling lectures.
before 24 February 1967
bound
Why
Tightens the phase4 L6a envelope from before 1967 to before 1967-02-24.
Reasoning
L6a envelope tightened to the telling day of nid 1262 (certain delivery 1967-02-24); same premise, finer precision. The phase4 L6a bound on this event is `before 1967`, an envelope over delivery YEARS computed without reading text. Its premise is that the fact is true by the time it is told; on that same premise the DAY of the telling is a strictly better upper bound. Nothing is re-decided — the bound is stated to the precision the evidence always supported. The delivery claim for 1967-02-24 on nid 1262 is held at `certain` by the corpus, which is what carries this claim. #2274; the L6a row stands beside this one.
before 1967
bound · possible
Reasoning
Qualifying passage ids [535214] belong to telling lecture nids [1264]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1967 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1967 is the MIN across telling lectures.
before 6 June 1967
bound
Why
Tightens the phase4 L6a envelope from before 1967 to before 1967-06-06.
Reasoning
L6a envelope tightened to the telling day of nid 1264 (certain delivery 1967-06-06); same premise, finer precision. The phase4 L6a bound on this event is `before 1967`, an envelope over delivery YEARS computed without reading text. Its premise is that the fact is true by the time it is told; on that same premise the DAY of the telling is a strictly better upper bound. Nothing is re-decided — the bound is stated to the precision the evidence always supported. The delivery claim for 1967-06-06 on nid 1264 is held at `certain` by the corpus, which is what carries this claim. #2274; the L6a row stands beside this one.
before 6 March 1967
bound · probable
Why
Corrects the L4.5 envelope (before 1967-06-06), which was tightened to the non-preferred, processing-note-contradicted catalog date; that row is left in place per append-only.
Reasoning
The event is recounted in this lecture, so it happened before the lecture was told. Nid 1264 carries two conflicting catalog delivery dates (1967-03-06 preferred, 1967-06-06 not preferred); the lecture's processing notes adopt 1967-03-06 as the delivery date and name 1967-06-06 as the conflicting claim, so 1967-03-06 is the tighter, better-supported upper bound than the existing before-1967-06-06 claim. Both candidate dates are catalog-backfill with no chrome dateline recovered for this lecture, so confidence is capped at probable rather than certain.
-
before 1968
bound · possible
Reasoning
Qualifying passage ids [537447] belong to telling lecture nids [1336]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1968 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1968 is the MIN across telling lectures.
before 11 March 1968
bound
Why
Tightens the phase4 L6a envelope from before 1968 to before 1968-03-11.
Reasoning
L6a envelope tightened to the telling day of nid 1336 (certain delivery 1968-03-11); same premise, finer precision. The phase4 L6a bound on this event is `before 1968`, an envelope over delivery YEARS computed without reading text. Its premise is that the fact is true by the time it is told; on that same premise the DAY of the telling is a strictly better upper bound. Nothing is re-decided — the bound is stated to the precision the evidence always supported. The delivery claim for 1968-03-11 on nid 1336 is held at `certain` by the corpus, which is what carries this claim. #2274; the L6a row stands beside this one.
between 1929 and 1959
stated
before 1968
bound · possible
Reasoning
Qualifying passage ids [543164] belong to telling lecture nids [1756]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1968 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1968 is the MIN across telling lectures.
before 1965
bound · possible
Reasoning
Qualifying passage ids [546227] belong to telling lecture nids [1836]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1965 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1965 is the MIN across telling lectures.
before 1971
bound · possible
Reasoning
Qualifying passage ids [554029] belong to telling lecture nids [2146]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1971 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1971 is the MIN across telling lectures.
1929
stated
Reasoning
The distinctive sequence and imagery—standing before the human-form divine as radiant infinite love, being embraced, fusing, and becoming one—matches the corpus's independently dated 1929 union accounts rather than a new 1971 experience.
before 1967
bound · possible
Reasoning
Qualifying passage ids [534891] belong to telling lecture nids [1252]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1967 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1967 is the MIN across telling lectures.
before 1966
bound · probable
Reasoning
The passage places the experience before the telling. The corrected lecture year supplies a safe upper envelope, capped at the delivery claim's probable confidence.
between June 1929 and August 1929
estimated · probable
Why
M7 dating pass (529; 525's readers, packet 014)
Reasoning
'When he embraced me and sent me... I saw the risen Christ and became one with him' (passage 534891) matches 'called, embraced, fused and sent in 1929' (18443, 7010, 6134), dated 1929-06..1929-08 in 1300 and 769.
before 1967
bound · possible
Reasoning
Qualifying passage ids [535049] belong to telling lecture nids [1258]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1967 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1967 is the MIN across telling lectures.
before 2 December 1966
bound · probable
Reasoning
Passage 535049 describes the encounter in completed past tense during node 1258. The lecture's independent chrome dateline is 1966-12-02 at probable confidence, so the experience predates that telling at no greater confidence than its anchor.
between June 1929 and August 1929
estimated · probable
Why
M7 dating pass (529; 525's readers, packet 014)
Reasoning
Matches the 1929 calling vision (embraced, fused, sent) dated 1929-06..1929-08 in events 1300, 769 and 18117; 16936 describes the same 'infinite being of love' embrace. Passage 535049 adds prodigal-son and 'God is love' details.
before 1972
bound · possible
Reasoning
Qualifying passage ids [526350] belong to telling lecture nids [20]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1972 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1972 is the MIN across telling lectures.
before 27 January 1972
bound
Why
Tightens the phase4 L6a envelope from before 1972 to before 1972-01-27.
Reasoning
L6a envelope tightened to the telling day of nid 20 (certain delivery 1972-01-27); same premise, finer precision. The phase4 L6a bound on this event is `before 1972`, an envelope over delivery YEARS computed without reading text. Its premise is that the fact is true by the time it is told; on that same premise the DAY of the telling is a strictly better upper bound. Nothing is re-decided — the bound is stated to the precision the evidence always supported. The delivery claim for 1972-01-27 on nid 20 is held at `certain` by the corpus, which is what carries this claim. #2274; the L6a row stands beside this one.
between June 1929 and August 1929
estimated · probable
Why
M7 dating pass (529; 525's readers, packet 030)
Reasoning
Neville's embrace by the Infinite Being / Infinite Love and sending is the 1929 calling vision (passage 526350, 'he embraced me... he sent me'). The 1929 call, embrace and sending are fixed in the chronology (events 6134, 7010, 18443, all 1929), with the vision itself placed June-August 1929 (events 769, 1300, 18117).
Told / reported
-
-
-
8 January 1968
stated · probable
Source
Wake Up, There Is No Death Law Of Assumption Full Lecture (nid 2178), telling 2178-0, told 1968-01-08
-
-
-
28 February 1969
estimated · probable
Why
Lane L7 (#2354) re-derivation. Supersedes in substance, not in storage, the refuted-date told claim(s) on this event; those rows stand per append-only.
Reasoning
Re-derived, not walked down. The existing told claim(s) on this event took their date from a delivery claim on node 1196 that the corpus has since REFUTED, so the corpus was asserting that Neville told this on a day it separately says he did not lecture. That is a contradiction rather than an over-confidence, and lowering the confidence would have hidden it instead of resolving it. The refutation stands and the told claim is the wrong side of it. Node 1196 surviving (non-refuted) claim: 1969-2-28 at `probable`. All claims on the node: 1965-3-5 refuted; 1969-2-28 probable (preferred). Superseded here: delta 0: 1965-03-05 at `certain` (run `corpus v1 / phase3b`) | delta 8: 1965-03-05 at `probable` (run `v1.1/l4/ceiling/c2`). The telling is dated by its lecture, so with the refuted date removed from consideration the surviving claim is what the telling inherits, at that claim own confidence and no higher.
Show all 47 claims
-
1 January 1968
stated · possible
Source
Awake O' Sleeper (nid 1318), telling 1318-0, told 1968-01-01
-
-
25 June 1969
stated · doubtful
20 September 1969
stated · doubtful
-
-
-
-
14 July 1969
estimated · probable
Why
Lane L7 (#2354) re-derivation. Supersedes in substance, not in storage, the refuted-date told claim(s) on this event; those rows stand per append-only.
Reasoning
Re-derived, not walked down. The existing told claim(s) on this event took their date from a delivery claim on node 1024 that the corpus has since REFUTED, so the corpus was asserting that Neville told this on a day it separately says he did not lecture. That is a contradiction rather than an over-confidence, and lowering the confidence would have hidden it instead of resolving it. The refutation stands and the told claim is the wrong side of it. Node 1024 surviving (non-refuted) claim: 1969-7-14 at `probable`. All claims on the node: 1957-??-?? refuted; 1958-3-17 refuted; 1969-7-14 probable (preferred). Superseded here: delta 0: 1958-03-17 at `certain` (run `corpus v1 / phase3b`) | delta 13: 1958-03-17 at `probable` (run `v1.1/l4/ceiling/c2`). The telling is dated by its lecture, so with the refuted date removed from consideration the surviving claim is what the telling inherits, at that claim own confidence and no higher.
11 June 1971
estimated · probable
Source
nid 1096 surviving delivery claim after refutation. All claims: 1963-4-9 refuted; 1971-6-11 probable (preferred)
Why
Lane L7 (#2354) re-derivation. Supersedes in substance, not in storage, the refuted-date told claim(s) on this event; those rows stand per append-only.
Reasoning
Re-derived, not walked down. The existing told claim(s) on this event took their date from a delivery claim on node 1096 that the corpus has since REFUTED, so the corpus was asserting that Neville told this on a day it separately says he did not lecture. That is a contradiction rather than an over-confidence, and lowering the confidence would have hidden it instead of resolving it. The refutation stands and the told claim is the wrong side of it. Node 1096 surviving (non-refuted) claim: 1971-6-11 at `probable`. All claims on the node: 1963-4-9 refuted; 1971-6-11 probable (preferred). Superseded here: delta 1: 1963-04-09 at `certain` (run `corpus v1 / phase3b`) | delta 14: 1963-04-09 at `probable` (run `v1.1/l4/ceiling/c2`). The telling is dated by its lecture, so with the refuted date removed from consideration the surviving claim is what the telling inherits, at that claim own confidence and no higher.
4 November 1968
estimated
Why
Lane L7 (#2354) re-derivation. Supersedes in substance, not in storage, the refuted-date told claim(s) on this event; those rows stand per append-only.
Reasoning
Re-derived, not walked down. The existing told claim(s) on this event took their date from a delivery claim on node 1394 that the corpus has since REFUTED, so the corpus was asserting that Neville told this on a day it separately says he did not lecture. That is a contradiction rather than an over-confidence, and lowering the confidence would have hidden it instead of resolving it. The refutation stands and the told claim is the wrong side of it. Node 1394 surviving (non-refuted) claim: 1968-11-4 at `certain`. All claims on the node: 1968-11-4 certain; 1969-10-16 refuted; 1968-11-4 certain (preferred). Superseded here: delta 6: 1969-10-16 at `certain` (run `corpus v1 / phase3b`). The telling is dated by its lecture, so with the refuted date removed from consideration the surviving claim is what the telling inherits, at that claim own confidence and no higher.
12 January 1965
estimated
Reasoning
Two independently-sourced claims on this lecture -- the legacy catalog entry and a chrome dateline harvested directly from the transcript's own header -- agree exactly, with no conflicting claim on the node. Told date is written at full certainty.
19 January 1965
estimated
Reasoning
Three independent sources converge on the same date, with no conflicting claim on this lecture.
8 January 1968
estimated · possible
Reasoning
Passage 555012 belongs to nid 2184. Its preferred surviving claim dates the matching Awake O Sleeper text to 1968-01-08 possible; confidence is not raised from that source.
15 September 1967
estimated
Why
Only one delivery claim exists; no tiebreak needed. Flagging for visibility: it is sourced only to an unreviewed legacy catalog entry with no independent chrome-dateline or media corroboration, though the weekday check found nothing wrong with it.
Reasoning
Lecture nid 76 carries exactly 1 delivery claim (N=1): 1967-09-15, stated/certain, from a legacy catalog backfill (state legacy_unreviewed, no competing claim to weigh it against). The weekday test supports it rather than raising doubt: 15 September 1967 was a Friday, one of Neville's three usual lecture nights, so there is no internal reason to distrust the sole claim. With only one claim, the told date inherits it directly at its stated confidence.
-
-
-
-
6 June 1967
stated · doubtful
6 March 1967
estimated · probable
Why
Existing 1967-06-06 told claim left in place per append-only; this is offered as the better-supported date.
Reasoning
The existing field_told claim of 1967-06-06 rests on the non-preferred of two conflicting catalog delivery dates for nid 1264. The lecture's own processing notes adopt 1967-03-06 as the delivery date and explicitly flag 1967-06-06 as the conflicting row, so the telling most likely happened on 1967-03-06. Deriving from a legacy catalog row rather than reading it straight off an independent source, this is estimated rather than stated, and capped at probable because no chrome dateline corroborates either catalog date.
-
-
-
between 15 July 1968 and 15 July 1971
stated · possible
-
-
7 October 1966
estimated · probable
Why
Lane L7 (#2354) re-derivation. Supersedes in substance, not in storage, the refuted-date told claim(s) on this event; those rows stand per append-only.
Reasoning
Re-derived, not walked down. The existing told claim(s) on this event took their date from a delivery claim on node 1252 that the corpus has since REFUTED, so the corpus was asserting that Neville told this on a day it separately says he did not lecture. That is a contradiction rather than an over-confidence, and lowering the confidence would have hidden it instead of resolving it. The refutation stands and the told claim is the wrong side of it. Node 1252 surviving (non-refuted) claim: 1966-10-7 at `probable`. All claims on the node: 1967-1-18 refuted; 1966-10-7 probable (preferred). Superseded here: delta 0: 1967-01-18 at `certain` (run `corpus v1 / phase3b`) | delta 1: 1967-01-18 at `probable` (run `v1.1/l4/ceiling/c2`). The telling is dated by its lecture, so with the refuted date removed from consideration the surviving claim is what the telling inherits, at that claim own confidence and no higher.
2 December 1966
estimated · probable
Why
Lane L7 (#2354) re-derivation. Supersedes in substance, not in storage, the refuted-date told claim(s) on this event; those rows stand per append-only.
Reasoning
Re-derived, not walked down. The existing told claim(s) on this event took their date from a delivery claim on node 1258 that the corpus has since REFUTED, so the corpus was asserting that Neville told this on a day it separately says he did not lecture. That is a contradiction rather than an over-confidence, and lowering the confidence would have hidden it instead of resolving it. The refutation stands and the told claim is the wrong side of it. Node 1258 surviving (non-refuted) claim: 1966-12-2 at `probable`. All claims on the node: 1967-1-27 refuted; 1966-12-2 probable (preferred). Superseded here: delta 0: 1967-01-27 at `certain` (run `corpus v1 / phase3b`) | delta 1: 1967-01-27 at `probable` (run `v1.1/l4/ceiling/c2`). The telling is dated by its lecture, so with the refuted date removed from consideration the surviving claim is what the telling inherits, at that claim own confidence and no higher.
-
5 March 1965
stated · refuted
Reasoning
|| v1.1/l7/told-close: the delivery claim this was derived from (nid 1196, 1965-3-5) was refuted by the L7 adjudication (#2363). The corrected told claim from the same lecture stands at 1969-2-28. This row is retired rather than deleted so the derivation history remains readable.
5 March 1965
stated · refuted
Why
Corrects the confidence of the told claim written by run `corpus v1 / phase3b` at delta 0 on this event; that claim is left standing per append-only. Ceiling rule #2132.
Reasoning
Confidence only; the date is not re-adjudicated and is left exactly as written. This claim is derived from the delivery claims of node 1196 and asserts `certain`, but the strongest claim that node carries is `probable`, so there is nothing for `certain` to inherit from. nid 1196 delivery claims: 1965-3-5 possible; 1969-2-28 probable. Walked back to `probable`, the ceiling. Whether the DATE is right is a separate question this row does not touch; if the evidence turns out to support more confidence, it will have to come from a source other than this node. || v1.1/l7/told-close: the delivery claim this was derived from (nid 1196, 1965-3-5) was refuted by the L7 adjudication (#2363). The corrected told claim from the same lecture stands at 1969-2-28. This row is retired rather than deleted so the derivation history remains readable.
17 March 1958
stated · refuted
Reasoning
|| v1.1/l7/told-close: the delivery claim this was derived from (nid 1024, 1958-3-17) was refuted by the L7 adjudication (#2363). The corrected told claim from the same lecture stands at 1969-7-14. This row is retired rather than deleted so the derivation history remains readable.
9 April 1963
stated · refuted
Source
Who Is the Real Messiah (nid 1096), telling 1096-0, told 1963-04-09
Reasoning
|| v1.1/l7/told-close: the delivery claim this was derived from (nid 1096, 1963-4-9) was refuted by the L7 adjudication (#2363). The corrected told claim from the same lecture stands at 1971-6-11. This row is retired rather than deleted so the derivation history remains readable.
16 October 1969
stated · refuted
Reasoning
|| v1.1/l7/told-close: the delivery claim this was derived from (nid 1394, 1969-10-16) was refuted by the L7 adjudication (#2363). The corrected told claim from the same lecture stands at 1968-11-4. This row is retired rather than deleted so the derivation history remains readable.
18 January 1967
stated · refuted
Reasoning
|| v1.1/l7/told-close: the delivery claim this was derived from (nid 1252, 1967-1-18) was refuted by the L7 adjudication (#2363). The corrected told claim from the same lecture stands at 1966-10-7. This row is retired rather than deleted so the derivation history remains readable.
27 January 1967
stated · refuted
Reasoning
|| v1.1/l7/told-close: the delivery claim this was derived from (nid 1258, 1967-1-27) was refuted by the L7 adjudication (#2363). The corrected told claim from the same lecture stands at 1966-12-2. This row is retired rather than deleted so the derivation history remains readable.
Sources
Source
- The Gospel ¶20 ("at the age of twenty-four" (lecture, 1968))
- Predestined Glory ¶3 ("’29" (lecture, 1969))
- Believe in Him ¶6 (In 1929 I did not volunteer, but was called. I stood in the presence of Infinite Love, who incorporated me into his body. I was sent as love - the body of the Risen Lord - back to a physical garment which is fragile, to tell those who are equally fragile…)
- Whatever You Believe in and Persist in Will Come to Pass ¶1 (I have told you and I mean it that I stood in the presence of the risen Lord, that he embraced me and incorporated me into his being. That was in 1929. He was infinite love. But when I looked at him I saw him as another and then at that moment I became w…)
- Imagination, the Real Man ¶38 (Mine happened in ’29. I was a boy of twenty-four, and it was simply a union by an embrace, but an ecstasy beyond the wildest dream of man. It was conscious…I can see it now. I can see him now. I can see the one who sent me…it’s vivid. I can see the one w…)
- The Head, the Source ¶32 (I talked with the risen Christ. He asked me a question, I answered him his question, and so there was communion as a man to man. Then the embrace and the incorporation…from then on, I am he. But I had no confirmation of it for thirty years; then came the…)
- Mystery Election ¶3 (Now, back in 1929 suddenly—unexpectedly, certainly unprepared for it—I was called. I was elected. It was simply that moment in time when I, having borne the fardel for the allotted time, was simply now released from my burden and my long lost rank restor…)
- Apostle ¶4 (And so here it was in the summer of 1929, I was called, taken in Spirit into the presence of the risen Christ, answering a very simple question—because the answer was before you, you couldn’t fail—and having answered his simple question he embraced me.)
- Predestined Glory ¶3 (“Now, let me share with you my own experience of the Call. It was this month back in 1929. I was then a dancer. I was 24 years of age, searching . . searching for an experience of God. If anyone went into blind alleys looking, I did.)
- Immortal Man ¶5 (The night I was called, back in 1929, I had no idea I had arrived at that state. But here I am, called into the presence of infinite love, and it’s man. Having answered his question correctly, that love was the greatest thing in the world. He embraced me…)
- Awake, O Sleeper! Arouse Thyself! ¶4 (I know, for I have stood in His presence. He embraced me and incorporated me into His body. Since that day back in 1929, I have been one with the body of the Risen Lord.)
- God Only Acts ¶10 (But I was a successful dancer, successful about making money and pulling my own.)
- Have You Found Him ¶11 (In 1929, when I was taken in Spirit into his presence and asked to name the greatest thing in the world, and when I answered in the words of Paul, quoting the three, “Faith, hope and love, these three; but the greatest of these is love” . At that moment …)
- Have You Found Him ¶11 (I walk the earth and you see Neville. I don’t feel this little garment that I shave in the morning. I go to sleep at night and I put this garment down.)
- Predestined Glory ¶4 ("when I was 24" (lecture, 1971))
- Imagination ¶52 (He asked me to name the greatest thing in the world. When I said, “Love,” he embraced me and we fused and became one spirit, one body but I didn’t lose my identity. When we separated from that union, I came out as Neville, only within myself I was consci…)
- The Last Days ¶6 (Having stood in the presence of the Risen Lord, answered his question, embraced him and been incorporated into his body, I know exactly what the Ancient of Days looks like. And when we were united, I became one with that body, one with that Spirit. I now…)
- Power Sent Me ¶3 (I stood in the presence of the risen Lord. He wore the human form divine of infinite love. He embraced me and incorporated me into his body. I became one body, one form with the risen Lord—“one Spirit, one Lord, one God and Father of all” .)
- Suffering Is Like That of David ¶17 (I did not lose my identity, and yet I became one with the risen Lord. Then infinite love that is his that was mine and is mine…and I feel it night after night as I drop off into the deep.)
- No Other Foundation ¶7 (I was sent by the same being who sent Paul. I stood in the presence of the Risen Lord. I answered his question, and as we embraced we fused into one body. At that moment I was united to the Lord by becoming one spirit with him.)
- Test Him and See ¶37 (I stood in the presence of Infinite Love . . and it’s man, and it’s God. And He communed with me as man to man, and embraced me when I answered the question that he asked, and I became one with the Risen Lord.)
- The Nature of God ¶17 (That is the form I saw when I stood in the presence of the Risen Lord and answered his question: “What is the greatest thing in the world?” in the words of Paul, as “Faith, hope and love, these three, but the greatest of these is love.” At that moment he…)
- Salvation History, Not Secular History ¶34 (And here we become one. We were two. I stood before Him. I was one, and He was one. Then I answered Him correctly: Love. When he said, “What is the greatest thing in the world?” I said, Love. And Love embraced me, and we fused.)
- Manner Jesus Birth Sign ¶31 (I quoted his words when I stood in the presence of the risen Lord and I said, ‘“Faith, hope and love, these three, but the greatest of these is love” , and the risen Lord embraced me.)
- Imaging Creates Reality ¶8 (I stood in the presence of the risen Lord, who is the embodiment of love, he incorporated me into his body, and I am forever one with that body.)
- John 10: The Shepherd ¶18 (Because, when he called me into his presence and I mentioned love is the greatest thing in the world, you see, he embraced me, he used his hands.)
- Invisible ¶1 (When I asked, or rather when He asked the question, and I answered it correctly, for the question was simple: “What is the greatest thing in the world?” And I answered, “Love.” And then He embraced me. Our bodies fused. We became one body—one body.)
- All Dreams Proceed From God ¶8 (Call him by any name, I stood in the presence of the risen Lord and was embraced by him. I became one with the risen Lord— union with God, one body, one Spirit—and then I was sent.)
- Truth Word God ¶10 (When this baptism happened to me, I had the sensation of being taken for a long, long journey. I found myself standing in front of the Risen Lord, who asked me the simple question: “What is the greatest thing in the world?”)
- Awake, O Sleeper! Arouse Thyself! ¶4 (For I stood in the presence of the risen Lord, who embraced me, and incorporated me into his one body. And from that moment, back in 1929, I am one with the body of the risen Lord.)
- Conception ¶12 (I know in my own case, when I stood in the presence of the Risen Lord, as we embraced we fused together.)
- Jehovahs Messiah (Unresolved ASR Witness) ¶13 (I have been called, and I have been sent. I am an Apostle. I stood in the presence of the Risen Lord, and He asked me to name the greatest thing in the world, and I answered in the words of Paul: “Faith, hope and love, these three; but the greatest of th…)
- Jehovahs Messiah (Unresolved ASR Witness) ¶23 (And then I was placed in the presence of another, who was Infinite Power; and it was he who sent me. He is the same one who embraced me, for God is a protean Being. He assumes any form that suits the purpose of the moment. So when I was sent, Power sent …)
- What Is Truth ¶36 (So when I stood in the presence of infinite love, who is Christ Jesus—I can see him now more clearly than I can see my own face—and when I answered, “The greatest thing in the world is love,” then he embraced me and incorporated me into his body.)
- The Holy One ¶43 (I stood in his presence and I knew exactly, he incorporates his body and makes us all equal, one by one.)
- The Mystery Hidden for Ages ¶36 (That man embraced me when I answered correctly, “The greatest thing in the world which is love.” Because I answered that way, he embraced me and incorporated me into his body; and then sent me to tell the story, but not with any loss of what happened to …)
- Election ¶52 (I can’t tell anyone my thrill when I stood in the presence of the risen Christ and answered correctly, which everyone will, and then he embraced me and I fused.)
- The Rock and the Highway ¶31 (And then I do know from my own personal experience, standing in the presence of infinite love, that it is man, and it is God.)
- The Gospel ¶20 (In 1929 at the age of twenty-four, I stood in the presence of the Risen Lord, and when he asked me a simple question, I answered in the words of Paul: “Faith, hope, and love, these three, but the greatest of these is love.”)
- Conception ¶12 (But I know in my own case, when a man stands in the presence of the risen God, it’s an embrace, and the embrace fuses the two…and that’s for man.)
- Divine Signs ¶14 (In 1929 1 had union with the Risen Lord, and 30 years later, in 1959, I was born from above.)
- Who Am I July 15 Marines Memorial Club San Francisco ¶29 (He asks a very simple question: “What is the greatest thing in the world?” And automatically, as though you were divinely prompted, you answer: “Faith, hope, and love, these three; but the greatest of all these is love.” At that moment, He embraces you, …)
- Memory ¶19 (So I say, I stood in the presence of the risen Christ, and it’s man. He’s infinite love, may I tell you. I felt no other emotion in his presence, nothing but love, infinite love. The simple question asked and the simple answer given prompted an embrace, …)
- My Glory ¶41 (I can describe the face, I can describe the hands and the voice, and I can’t describe the body — it’s radiant, and it’s all power, and it’s always, and it’s all love.)
- I Am the Truth ¶26 (And I was whirled out of that wonderful assembly back at one night, little babe, and the room filled with light, and for the longest while it didn’t subside. But what must I do? Time to act — what? I had no money, no name, no reputation, no education, an…)
- Free or Slave ¶47 (For when he embraced me and sent me, at that moment of the embrace when I saw the risen Christ and I became one with him; at that moment I was an apostle.)
- God Plays All the Parts ¶17 (I certainly was not pure in heart. I certainly was not anything I would say worthy of that call, but I knew as I came before him and stood in his presence, of the risen Christ, when he looked into me he could see no one but himself.)
- Faith Is Loyalty To Unseen Reality ¶34 (I stood in the presence of the Infinite Being and Infinite Love. And he embraced me. And he sent me, after he embraced me. Therefore, love embraced me.)