He recounts that when he awoke there was no one else present to lift him up — only the wind and the breath — so he awoke within himself.
Date (happened)
between 1959 and 25 July 1968
unresolved
between 1959 and 25 July 1968
stated · preferred
1959
stated · probable
Source
phase-2 canonical event (fingerprint references)
c. 1959
stated · probable
twelve years ago this coming month
relative · probable
Source
"twelve years ago this coming month", told in The Secret of Imagining-Class-Lecture (Unresolved ASR Witness) (nid 3994)
before 1969
bound · possible
Source
qualifying source passages 531366; telling lecture nids 1142
Reasoning
Qualifying passage ids [531366] belong to telling lecture nids [1142]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1969 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1969 is the MIN across telling lectures.
before 27 January 1969
bound
Source
telling lecture nid 1142, certain delivery 1969-01-27
Why
Tightens the phase4 L6a envelope from before 1969 to before 1969-01-27.
Reasoning
L6a envelope tightened to the telling day of nid 1142 (certain delivery 1969-01-27); same premise, finer precision. The phase4 L6a bound on this event is `before 1969`, an envelope over delivery YEARS computed without reading text. Its premise is that the fact is true by the time it is told; on that same premise the DAY of the telling is a strictly better upper bound. Nothing is re-decided — the bound is stated to the precision the evidence always supported. The delivery claim for 1969-01-27 on nid 1142 is held at `certain` by the corpus, which is what carries this claim. #2274; the L6a row stands beside this one.
-
-
Show all 12 claims
-
1959
stated
Source
"in ’59", told in Drugs Dope Marijuana Lsd Alcohol Vegetarianism Etc (nid 2001)
c. 1946
stated · refuted
Why
pm-actor-525: refuted by the M7 dating pass (529; 525's readers, packet 017): Computed from node 1041's refuted 1958-01-27 delivery date; node 1041 is now dated 1971 (probable), and 'twelve years ago' from 1971 gives 1959, matching every other telling of this event.
c. 1964
stated · refuted
Source
age 59 + birth 1905 = 1964 (2 statements, told 1964)
Why
pm-actor-525: refuted by the M7 dating pass (529; 525's readers, packet 017): Derived from 'age 59' arithmetic on a delivery date no longer held for either witnessing lecture; two independent 'in ’59' statements at certain confidence fix the year directly.
Told / reported
-
26 February 1968
stated · probable
18 December 1968
stated · doubtful
Source
Christ Is Your Life (nid 1388), telling 1388-3, told 1968-12-18
-
-
1971
estimated · probable
Why
Lane L7 (#2354) re-derivation. Supersedes in substance, not in storage, the refuted-date told claim(s) on this event; those rows stand per append-only.
Reasoning
Re-derived, not walked down. The existing told claim(s) on this event took their date from a delivery claim on node 1041 that the corpus has since REFUTED, so the corpus was asserting that Neville told this on a day it separately says he did not lecture. That is a contradiction rather than an over-confidence, and lowering the confidence would have hidden it instead of resolving it. The refutation stands and the told claim is the wrong side of it. Node 1041 surviving (non-refuted) claim: 1971-??-?? at `probable`. All claims on the node: 1958-1-27 refuted; 1971-??-?? probable (preferred). Superseded here: delta 0: 1958-01-27 at `certain` (run `corpus v1 / phase3b`) | delta 6: 1958-01-27 at `probable` (run `v1.1/l4/ceiling/c2`). The telling is dated by its lecture, so with the refuted date removed from consideration the surviving claim is what the telling inherits, at that claim own confidence and no higher.
27 January 1969
stated
Source
The Mystery of Inspiration (nid 1142), telling 1142-3, told 1969-01-27
-
Show all 13 claims
4 June 1971
estimated · possible
Why
Lane L7 (#2354) re-derivation. Supersedes in substance, not in storage, the refuted-date told claim(s) on this event; those rows stand per append-only.
Reasoning
Re-derived, not walked down. The existing told claim(s) on this event took their date from a delivery claim on node 1928 that the corpus has since REFUTED, so the corpus was asserting that Neville told this on a day it separately says he did not lecture. That is a contradiction rather than an over-confidence, and lowering the confidence would have hidden it instead of resolving it. The refutation stands and the told claim is the wrong side of it. Node 1928 surviving (non-refuted) claim: 1971-6-4 at `possible`. All claims on the node: 1969-5-26 refuted; 1971-6-4 possible (preferred). Superseded here: delta 1: 1969-05-26 at `certain` (run `corpus v1 / phase3b`). The telling is dated by its lecture, so with the refuted date removed from consideration the surviving claim is what the telling inherits, at that claim own confidence and no higher.
27 January 1958
stated · refuted
Reasoning
|| v1.1/l7/told-close: the delivery claim this was derived from (nid 1041, 1958-1-27) was refuted by the L7 adjudication (#2363). The corrected told claim from the same lecture stands at 1971-?-?. This row is retired rather than deleted so the derivation history remains readable.
27 January 1958
stated · refuted
Why
Corrects the confidence of the told claim written by run `corpus v1 / phase3b` at delta 0 on this event; that claim is left standing per append-only. Ceiling rule #2132.
Reasoning
Confidence only; the date is not re-adjudicated and is left exactly as written. This claim is derived from the delivery claims of node 1041 and asserts `certain`, but the strongest claim that node carries is `probable`, so there is nothing for `certain` to inherit from. nid 1041 delivery claims: 1958-1-27 refuted; 1971-??-?? probable. Walked back to `probable`, the ceiling. Whether the DATE is right is a separate question this row does not touch; if the evidence turns out to support more confidence, it will have to come from a source other than this node. || v1.1/l7/told-close: the delivery claim this was derived from (nid 1041, 1958-1-27) was refuted by the L7 adjudication (#2363). The corrected told claim from the same lecture stands at 1971-?-?. This row is retired rather than deleted so the derivation history remains readable.
12 March 1971
stated · refuted
26 May 1969
stated · refuted
Reasoning
|| v1.1/l7/told-close: the delivery claim this was derived from (nid 1928, 1969-5-26) was refuted by the L7 adjudication (#2363). The corrected told claim from the same lecture stands at 1971-6-4. This row is retired rather than deleted so the derivation history remains readable.
Sources
Source
- Who Is the Son of Man ¶9 (I have been teaching this Law since 1938, but I did not know the Promise of God until twelve years ago in this City when it happened to me.)
- The Friend of Sinners ¶33 (Because I awoke a few years ago, I am in the skull of every being in this world, but especially those who hear me.)
- The State of Vision ¶24 (I know, as far as I am concerned, I never heard it from a man, or saw the Bible’s story as relating to me. But I know from experience that the truth comes through an act of God in self revelation, for God is hidden in the mind of man and unveils himself …)
- Revelation Risen Christ ¶22 (When Christ awoke in me I was so amazed, as I did not realise I had been asleep.)
- Awake O Sleeper July 25 Marines Memorial Club San Francisco ¶18 (In my own case it happened in ’59 – almost ten years, and, yet, every moment of time I dwell upon it.)
- All Are Human ¶31 (I have experienced the Promise, complete, fulfilled, and I know my inheritance is the kingdom of heaven.)
- The Mystery of Inspiration ¶14 (And I know from my own experience when I awoke I didn’t see anyone else; there was no one lifting me up.)
- Secret Imagination ¶37 (You know the Promise because it only happened to me twelve years ago this coming month.)
- Secret Imagination ¶37 (You know the Promise because it only happened to me twelve years ago this coming month. So, those who knew me before have not heard from me the Promise.)
- Christmas, The Redeeming Message ¶44 ("at the age of fifty‑nine")
- Life Through Death ¶19 ("my fifty‑nine years" (lecture, 1964))
- The Secret of Imagining ¶55 (So it is my birthday today in a spiritual sense. The little body that now stands before you, that came in the year 1905.)
- I AM the Reality Called Imagination ¶16 (And when it did happen to me in ’59, what a shock! But it was back in 1933 that this thing actually began to unfold within me, when old Ab would not explain what he meant when he said to me, “You are in Barbados.”)
- I AM the Reality Called Imagination ¶16 (And when I came back to New York City, friends of mine who knew me in the days when I never touched alcohol or smoking, — I never acquired smoking. I tried it, and I couldn’t seem to get it. Alcohol I got!)