Closing Night of the Lecture Series
Date (happened)
19 October 1965
unresolved
19 October 1965
stated · preferred
15 December 1957
stated · probable
11 December 1964
stated · probable
Told / reported
-
-
20 December 1965
stated · doubtful
18 December 1967
stated · possible
28 December 1967
stated · doubtful
-
18 December 1967
stated · possible
Why
Corrects the confidence of the told claim written by run `corpus v1 / phase3b` at delta 5 on this event; that claim is left standing per append-only. Ceiling rule #2132.
Reasoning
Confidence only; the date is not re-adjudicated and is left exactly as written. This claim is derived from the delivery claims of node 1315 and asserts `certain`, but the strongest claim that node carries is `probable`, so there is nothing for `certain` to inherit from. nid 1315 delivery claims: 1967-12-18 possible; 1967-12-11 probable. Walked back to `probable`, the ceiling. Whether the DATE is right is a separate question this row does not touch; if the evidence turns out to support more confidence, it will have to come from a source other than this node.
28 December 1967
stated · doubtful
Why
Corrects the confidence of the told claim written by run `corpus v1 / phase3b` at delta 6 on this event; that claim is left standing per append-only. Ceiling rule #2132.
Reasoning
Confidence only; the date is not re-adjudicated and is left exactly as written. This claim is derived from the delivery claims of node 1317 and asserts `certain`, but the strongest claim that node carries is `probable`, so there is nothing for `certain` to inherit from. nid 1317 delivery claims: 1967-12-28 doubtful; 1967-4-28 probable. Walked back to `probable`, the ceiling. Whether the DATE is right is a separate question this row does not touch; if the evidence turns out to support more confidence, it will have to come from a source other than this node.
Show all 12 claims
29 October 1965
estimated
Why
Lane L7 (#2354) re-derivation. Supersedes in substance, not in storage, the refuted-date told claim(s) on this event; those rows stand per append-only.
Reasoning
Re-derived, not walked down. The existing told claim(s) on this event took their date from a delivery claim on node 1216 that the corpus has since REFUTED, so the corpus was asserting that Neville told this on a day it separately says he did not lecture. That is a contradiction rather than an over-confidence, and lowering the confidence would have hidden it instead of resolving it. The refutation stands and the told claim is the wrong side of it. Node 1216 surviving (non-refuted) claim: 1965-10-29 at `certain`. All claims on the node: 1965-10-29 certain; 1969-9-26 refuted; 1965-10-29 certain (preferred). Superseded here: delta 2: 1969-09-26 at `certain` (run `corpus v1 / phase3b`). The telling is dated by its lecture, so with the refuted date removed from consideration the surviving claim is what the telling inherits, at that claim own confidence and no higher.
31 March 1967
estimated · doubtful
Why
Lane L7 (#2354) re-derivation. Supersedes in substance, not in storage, the refuted-date told claim(s) on this event; those rows stand per append-only.
Reasoning
Re-derived, not walked down. The existing told claim(s) on this event took their date from a delivery claim on node 1270 that the corpus has since REFUTED, so the corpus was asserting that Neville told this on a day it separately says he did not lecture. That is a contradiction rather than an over-confidence, and lowering the confidence would have hidden it instead of resolving it. The refutation stands and the told claim is the wrong side of it. Node 1270 surviving (non-refuted) claim: 1967-3-31 at `doubtful`. All claims on the node: 1958-3-31 refuted; 1967-3-31 doubtful; 1967-3-31 certain (preferred); 1969-9-16 refuted. Superseded here: delta 4: 1969-09-16 at `certain` (run `corpus v1 / phase3b`). The telling is dated by its lecture, so with the refuted date removed from consideration the surviving claim is what the telling inherits, at that claim own confidence and no higher.
26 September 1969
stated · refuted
Reasoning
|| v1.1/l7/told-close: the delivery claim this was derived from (nid 1216, 1969-9-26) was refuted by the L7 adjudication (#2363). The corrected told claim from the same lecture stands at 1965-10-29. This row is retired rather than deleted so the derivation history remains readable.
16 September 1969
stated · refuted
Reasoning
|| v1.1/l7/told-close: the delivery claim this was derived from (nid 1270, 1969-9-16) was refuted by the L7 adjudication (#2363). The corrected told claim from the same lecture stands at 1967-3-31. This row is retired rather than deleted so the derivation history remains readable.
Sources
Source
- Live the Answer Now ¶17 (I wished her a Merry Christmas and she said to me, “Neville, I want to tell you, I have had the first three experiences.” I said, “You’ve had the first three experiences and this is the first time that I have learned of it? And you haven’t even told me t…)
- The Six-Pointed Star ¶33 (I have but two and a half weeks left… I close at the end of this month on a Friday night.)
- Your Creative Power ¶63 (By the way, we’re here every Tuesday and Friday right through the year, closing, I think, the 17th of December…that’s the day.)
- Summary 1965 ¶0 (We’re closing tonight for just a little while. We’ll be back on the 19th of October. If you’re on the mailing list, you’ll receive a notice.)
- The New Idea Against the Old ¶37 (As you know, we’re here every Monday and Friday until the end of April, so our next lecture is Monday. I think we have eight, four weeks from Monday.)
- Christmas, the Birth of Christ in Man ¶35 (So I will take just a small ad in the L.A. Times the Saturday before I open to remind anyone who may forget the day. But I’ll be open on the 8th of January, here, at 8 PM.)
- Closing Summary 1967 ¶0 (We are closing tonight and if it be the Father’s will, I’ll be back in September. My work is finished, completely finished.)
- Where Are You Staying (Where Do You Live Psychologically) ¶4 (Now when I closed a month ago on the 11th day of December I told a story of a little girl. A few of you were present, not all of you, so for the benefit of you who were not present let me state it again.)