Closing Night of the Lecture Series

Date (happened)
19 October 1965
unresolved
  1. 19 October 1965 stated · preferred
    Source Summary 1965 ¶0"the 19th of October", told in Summary 1965 (nid 1229)
  2. 15 December 1957 stated · probable
    Source Live the Answer Now ¶17"our closing night on the 15th of December", told in Live the Answer Now (nid 1051)
  3. 11 December 1964 stated · probable
    Source Where Are You Staying (Where Do You Live Psychologically) ¶4"a month ago on the 11th day of December", told in Where Are You Staying (Where Do You Live Psychologically) (nid 78)
Told / reported
  1. 15 January 1968 stated
    Source Live the Answer NowLive the Answer Now (nid 1051), telling 1051-2, told 1968-01-15
  2. 14 May 1963 stated
    Source The Six-Pointed StarThe Six-Pointed Star (nid 1106), telling 1106-3, told 1963-05-14
  3. 20 December 1965 stated · doubtful
    Source Summary 1965Summary 1965 (nid 1229), telling 1229-0, told 1965-12-20
  4. 18 December 1967 stated · possible
    Source Christmas, the Birth of Christ in ManChristmas, the Birth of Christ in Man (nid 1315), telling 1315-12, told 1967-12-18
  5. 28 December 1967 stated · doubtful
    Source Closing Summary 1967Closing Summary 1967 (nid 1317), telling 1317-0, told 1967-12-28
  6. 26 February 1965 stated
    Source Where Are You Staying (Where Do You Live Psychologically)Where Are You Staying (Where Do You Live Psychologically) (nid 78), telling 78-1, told 1965-02-26
  7. 18 December 1967 stated · possible
    Source Christmas, the Birth of Christ in ManChristmas, the Birth of Christ in Man (nid 1315), telling 1315-12, told 1967-12-18
    Why Corrects the confidence of the told claim written by run `corpus v1 / phase3b` at delta 5 on this event; that claim is left standing per append-only. Ceiling rule #2132.
    Reasoning Confidence only; the date is not re-adjudicated and is left exactly as written. This claim is derived from the delivery claims of node 1315 and asserts `certain`, but the strongest claim that node carries is `probable`, so there is nothing for `certain` to inherit from. nid 1315 delivery claims: 1967-12-18 possible; 1967-12-11 probable. Walked back to `probable`, the ceiling. Whether the DATE is right is a separate question this row does not touch; if the evidence turns out to support more confidence, it will have to come from a source other than this node.
  8. 28 December 1967 stated · doubtful
    Source Closing Summary 1967Closing Summary 1967 (nid 1317), telling 1317-0, told 1967-12-28
    Why Corrects the confidence of the told claim written by run `corpus v1 / phase3b` at delta 6 on this event; that claim is left standing per append-only. Ceiling rule #2132.
    Reasoning Confidence only; the date is not re-adjudicated and is left exactly as written. This claim is derived from the delivery claims of node 1317 and asserts `certain`, but the strongest claim that node carries is `probable`, so there is nothing for `certain` to inherit from. nid 1317 delivery claims: 1967-12-28 doubtful; 1967-4-28 probable. Walked back to `probable`, the ceiling. Whether the DATE is right is a separate question this row does not touch; if the evidence turns out to support more confidence, it will have to come from a source other than this node.
Show all 12 claims
  1. 29 October 1965 estimated
    Source Your Creative Powernid 1216 surviving delivery claim after refutation. All claims: 1965-10-29 certain; 1969-9-26 refuted; 1965-10-29 certain (preferred)
    Why Lane L7 (#2354) re-derivation. Supersedes in substance, not in storage, the refuted-date told claim(s) on this event; those rows stand per append-only.
    Reasoning Re-derived, not walked down. The existing told claim(s) on this event took their date from a delivery claim on node 1216 that the corpus has since REFUTED, so the corpus was asserting that Neville told this on a day it separately says he did not lecture. That is a contradiction rather than an over-confidence, and lowering the confidence would have hidden it instead of resolving it. The refutation stands and the told claim is the wrong side of it. Node 1216 surviving (non-refuted) claim: 1965-10-29 at `certain`. All claims on the node: 1965-10-29 certain; 1969-9-26 refuted; 1965-10-29 certain (preferred). Superseded here: delta 2: 1969-09-26 at `certain` (run `corpus v1 / phase3b`). The telling is dated by its lecture, so with the refuted date removed from consideration the surviving claim is what the telling inherits, at that claim own confidence and no higher.
  2. 31 March 1967 estimated · doubtful
    Source The New Idea Against the Oldnid 1270 surviving delivery claim after refutation. All claims: 1958-3-31 refuted; 1967-3-31 doubtful; 1967-3-31 certain (preferred); 1969-9-16 refuted
    Why Lane L7 (#2354) re-derivation. Supersedes in substance, not in storage, the refuted-date told claim(s) on this event; those rows stand per append-only.
    Reasoning Re-derived, not walked down. The existing told claim(s) on this event took their date from a delivery claim on node 1270 that the corpus has since REFUTED, so the corpus was asserting that Neville told this on a day it separately says he did not lecture. That is a contradiction rather than an over-confidence, and lowering the confidence would have hidden it instead of resolving it. The refutation stands and the told claim is the wrong side of it. Node 1270 surviving (non-refuted) claim: 1967-3-31 at `doubtful`. All claims on the node: 1958-3-31 refuted; 1967-3-31 doubtful; 1967-3-31 certain (preferred); 1969-9-16 refuted. Superseded here: delta 4: 1969-09-16 at `certain` (run `corpus v1 / phase3b`). The telling is dated by its lecture, so with the refuted date removed from consideration the surviving claim is what the telling inherits, at that claim own confidence and no higher.
  3. 26 September 1969 stated · refuted
    Source Your Creative PowerYour Creative Power (nid 1216), telling 1216-12, told 1969-09-26
    Reasoning || v1.1/l7/told-close: the delivery claim this was derived from (nid 1216, 1969-9-26) was refuted by the L7 adjudication (#2363). The corrected told claim from the same lecture stands at 1965-10-29. This row is retired rather than deleted so the derivation history remains readable.
  4. 16 September 1969 stated · refuted
    Source The New Idea Against the OldThe New Idea Against the Old (nid 1270), telling 1270-8, told 1969-09-16
    Reasoning || v1.1/l7/told-close: the delivery claim this was derived from (nid 1270, 1969-9-16) was refuted by the L7 adjudication (#2363). The corrected told claim from the same lecture stands at 1967-3-31. This row is retired rather than deleted so the derivation history remains readable.
Sources

Source

  • Live the Answer Now ¶17 (I wished her a Merry Christmas and she said to me, “Neville, I want to tell you, I have had the first three experiences.” I said, “You’ve had the first three experiences and this is the first time that I have learned of it? And you haven’t even told me t…)
  • The Six-Pointed Star ¶33 (I have but two and a half weeks left… I close at the end of this month on a Friday night.)
  • Your Creative Power ¶63 (By the way, we’re here every Tuesday and Friday right through the year, closing, I think, the 17th of December…that’s the day.)
  • Summary 1965 ¶0 (We’re closing tonight for just a little while. We’ll be back on the 19th of October. If you’re on the mailing list, you’ll receive a notice.)
  • The New Idea Against the Old ¶37 (As you know, we’re here every Monday and Friday until the end of April, so our next lecture is Monday. I think we have eight, four weeks from Monday.)
  • Christmas, the Birth of Christ in Man ¶35 (So I will take just a small ad in the L.A. Times the Saturday before I open to remind anyone who may forget the day. But I’ll be open on the 8th of January, here, at 8 PM.)
  • Closing Summary 1967 ¶0 (We are closing tonight and if it be the Father’s will, I’ll be back in September. My work is finished, completely finished.)
  • Where Are You Staying (Where Do You Live Psychologically) ¶4 (Now when I closed a month ago on the 11th day of December I told a story of a little girl. A few of you were present, not all of you, so for the benefit of you who were not present let me state it again.)