Neville describes returning to Dr. Bailes's platform for a new series, saying Bailes has never once restricted him, and that nothing in the past year - many revelations and experiments - has shaken his foundation.
Date (happened)
c. 21 June 1953
conclusion · probable
Why
dc1-agreement-20261004, pm-actor-551 (PM 8702)
Reasoning
All 2 claims agree on c. 1953-06-21: passage:527640; passage:527640.
c. 21 June 1953
estimated · probable · preferred
Why
M7 dating pass (529; 525's readers, packet 012)
Reasoning
As the opening lecture of Neville's four-Sunday Los Angeles engagement at the Fox-Wilshire Theater for Dr. Bailes (season 20523, 21 June-17 July 1953), introduced by Neville as 'an entirely new series', this event most plausibly falls on the series' first Sunday, 21 June 1953.
between 19 July 1952 and 19 July 1953
stated · probable
19 July 1953
estimated · refuted
Why
pm-actor-525: refuted by the M7 dating pass (529; 525's readers, packet 012): This claim assumed lecture node 1002 is the San Francisco series opener of 19 July 1953; per the established correction (PM 7864), node 1002 is actually the Los Angeles Fox-Wilshire opening (June 1953), and this event's own place (Los Angeles) matches that, not San Francisco.
Reasoning
Passage 527640 is spoken from Dr. Bailes's platform and explicitly describes Neville as being back there for the new series, so this event is contemporaneous with the lecture rather than merely recalled during it. The lecture's adjudicated surviving delivery date is 1953-07-19 at certain confidence, establishing the date of the return event.
Told / reported
19 July 1953
conclusion
Why
dc1-agreement-20261004, pm-actor-551 (PM 8702)
Reasoning
1 claim, no conflict: 1953-07-19 (node:1002).
19 July 1953
estimated
Why
Lane L7 (#2354) re-derivation. Supersedes in substance, not in storage, the refuted-date told claim(s) on this event; those rows stand per append-only.
Reasoning
Re-derived, not walked down. The existing told claim(s) on this event took their date from a delivery claim on node 1002 that the corpus has since REFUTED, so the corpus was asserting that Neville told this on a day it separately says he did not lecture. That is a contradiction rather than an over-confidence, and lowering the confidence would have hidden it instead of resolving it. The refutation stands and the told claim is the wrong side of it. Node 1002 surviving (non-refuted) claim: 1953-7-19 at `certain`. All claims on the node: 1953-7-19 certain; 1958-1-20 refuted; 1953-??-?? possible; 1953-7-19 probable; 1953-7-19 certain (preferred). Superseded here: delta 0: 1958-01-20 at `certain` (run `corpus v1 / phase3b`). The telling is dated by its lecture, so with the refuted date removed from consideration the surviving claim is what the telling inherits, at that claim own confidence and no higher.
20 January 1958
stated · refuted
Reasoning
|| v1.1/l7/told-close: the delivery claim this was derived from (nid 1002, 1958-1-20) was refuted by the L7 adjudication (#2363). The corrected told claim from the same lecture stands at 1953-7-19. This row is retired rather than deleted so the derivation history remains readable.
Sources
Source
- The Power of Awareness ¶0 (I think you know how thrilled I am to be back here, for this is the one platform that grants me complete freedom. You know that. Dr. Bailes has never once restricted me or even suggested any condition.)