A wealthy older woman seeks a younger husband through the law

The day before the lecture Neville received a long distance telephone call from a very rich seventy-five-year-old New York woman who had used the law successfully for her son but could not bring about her own wish to marry a richer, much younger man in the social register; he told her the market was not limited because everyone walking the earth is God, only in states.
Date (happened)
24 September 1959
certain
  1. 24 September 1959 conclusion
    Why dc1-agreement-20261004, pm-actor-551 (PM 8702)
    Reasoning 1 claim, no conflict: 1959-09-24 (passage:527917).
  2. 24 September 1959 stated · preferred
    Source The Bread and the Wine ¶15"yesterday", told in The Bread and The Wine (nid 1023)
Place
New York City
Persons
Neville Goddard
Told
  1. 25 September 1959 conclusion
    Why dc1-agreement-20261004, pm-actor-551 (PM 8702)
    Reasoning 1 claim, no conflict: 1959-09-25 (node:1023).
  2. 25 September 1959 estimated
    Source The Bread and the Winenid 1023 surviving delivery claim after refutation. All claims: 1959-9-25 certain; 1959-9-26 refuted; 1967-3-17 refuted; 1959-9-25 certain (preferred)
    Why Lane L7 (#2354) re-derivation. Supersedes in substance, not in storage, the refuted-date told claim(s) on this event; those rows stand per append-only.
    Reasoning Re-derived, not walked down. The existing told claim(s) on this event took their date from a delivery claim on node 1023 that the corpus has since REFUTED, so the corpus was asserting that Neville told this on a day it separately says he did not lecture. That is a contradiction rather than an over-confidence, and lowering the confidence would have hidden it instead of resolving it. The refutation stands and the told claim is the wrong side of it. Node 1023 surviving (non-refuted) claim: 1959-9-25 at `certain`. All claims on the node: 1959-9-25 certain; 1959-9-26 refuted; 1967-3-17 refuted; 1959-9-25 certain (preferred). Superseded here: delta 0: 1967-03-17 at `certain` (run `corpus v1 / phase3b`). The telling is dated by its lecture, so with the refuted date removed from consideration the surviving claim is what the telling inherits, at that claim own confidence and no higher.
  3. 17 March 1967 stated · refuted
    Source The Bread and the WineThe Bread and The Wine (nid 1023), telling 1023-1, told 1967-03-17
    Reasoning || v1.1/l7/told-close: the delivery claim this was derived from (nid 1023, 1967-3-17) was refuted by the L7 adjudication (#2363). The corrected told claim from the same lecture stands at 1959-9-25. This row is retired rather than deleted so the derivation history remains readable.
Sources

Source

  • The Bread and the Wine ¶15 (I had a long distance call yesterday from New York. The lady who called me is very, very rich by the standards of diamonds and money. She has not fingers enough for all her diamonds.)