This is the radio-broadcast announcement embedded in 'The Law of Assumption' (nid 2100, KECA, July 1951), in which Neville tells listeners he will speak for the vacationing Dr. Bailes the following Sunday at the Fox Wilshire Theatre on the subject 'Changing Your Future'.
Date (happened)
c. July 1951
conclusion
Why
dc1-agreement-20261004, pm-actor-551 (PM 8702)
Reasoning
1 claim, no conflict: c. 1951-07 (estimated (no source recorded)).
c. July 1951
estimated · preferred
Why
M7 dating pass (529; 525's readers, packet 035): its source passage 553069 does not exist on www: left off; stated with no source: written as estimated with the reader's reasoning
Reasoning
Lecture 2100 (The Law of Assumption) is certainly delivered 1951-07; the embedded radio announcement shares that date. The 1969-05-14 claim on this node is already refuted.
Told / reported
c. July 1951
conclusion
Why
dc1-agreement-20261004, pm-actor-551 (PM 8702)
Reasoning
1 claim, no conflict: c. 1951-07 (node:2100).
c. July 1951
stated
Why
Corrects a prior field_told value on this event that had inherited the doubtful delivery claim instead of the certain one.
Reasoning
Three independent sources (the catalog entry, the surviving live-text opening, and a separately-removed chrome byline) agree this radio talk was delivered in July 1951, with day unknown. This event's earlier field_told row asserted 1969-05-14 as certain, but that is the weaker of the lecture's two conflicting delivery claims — already downgraded to doubtful at the lecture level as a probable catalog cross-assignment with no support in the document itself and a direct contradiction of the well-corroborated July 1951 dating.
14 May 1969
stated · refuted
Reasoning
|| v1.1/l7/told-lower: lowered `certain` -> `doubtful`. The telling-date 1969-05-14 is refuted on the source lecture (nid 2100) and no live claim on that node supports it, so the corpus can no longer say WHEN this was told. ⛔ The row is KEPT, not retired: it also records THAT nid 2100 tells this event, which is true and checkable from the passages, and retiring it would discard that with the date. || v1.1/l7/told-close-residue: the delivery claim this was derived from (nid 2100, 1969-5-14) is now refuted. The corrected told claim from the same lecture stands at 1951-7-?. This row is retired rather than deleted so the derivation history remains readable.