Neville's family voyage from Trinidad to Mobile on a bauxite freighter

Neville, his wife and small daughter flew from Barbados to Trinidad to take a bauxite freighter from Port-of-Spain to Mobile, Alabama; the captain briefed him on meal times and warned him not to press any buttons because it was a union ship.
Date (happened)
c. 1946
unresolved
  1. before 1968 bound · possible
    Source The Divine Body ¶18qualifying source passages 528431; telling lecture nids 1036
    Reasoning Qualifying passage ids [528431] belong to telling lecture nids [1036]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1968 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1968 is the MIN across telling lectures.
  2. before 1970 bound · possible
    Source The Divine Body ¶18corrected envelope; qualifying source passage 528431; telling lecture nids 1036
    Why Corrects the phase4 L6a envelope on this event from before 1968 to before 1970.
    Reasoning Envelope recompute, arithmetic only. The phase4 L6a row on this event states its own rule: each telling lecture contributes MAX of its non-refuted delivery years, and the envelope is the MIN across telling lectures. Recomputed live over lecture nid(s) 1036 that row cites, MAX(non-refuted field_delivery_year) gives 1970, not the 1968 the row carries — the bound was below its own stated rule and therefore UNSAFE: it asserted the event did not happen in 2 year(s) where it may sit. Same premise, same evidence, no re-reading and no re-judgement; only the maximum was taken correctly. The L6a row stands beside this one (append-only). Ruling: #2235 delta 1, architect 378.
  3. c. 1946 estimated · possible
    Why M7 dating pass (529; 525's readers, packet 045): its source passage 528431 does not exist on www: left off
    Reasoning The Barbados-to-Trinidad flight before the freighter, the small daughter and wife Catherine, and the established 1946 postwar Barbados trip together fit this as that trip's return leg.
Told / reported
  1. 1970 estimated
    Source The Divine Bodynid 1036 surviving delivery claim after refutation. All claims: 1957-??-?? refuted; 1968-5-10 refuted; 1970-??-?? certain (preferred)
    Why Lane L7 (#2354) re-derivation. Supersedes in substance, not in storage, the refuted-date told claim(s) on this event; those rows stand per append-only.
    Reasoning Re-derived, not walked down. The existing told claim(s) on this event took their date from a delivery claim on node 1036 that the corpus has since REFUTED, so the corpus was asserting that Neville told this on a day it separately says he did not lecture. That is a contradiction rather than an over-confidence, and lowering the confidence would have hidden it instead of resolving it. The refutation stands and the told claim is the wrong side of it. Node 1036 surviving (non-refuted) claim: 1970-??-?? at `certain`. All claims on the node: 1957-??-?? refuted; 1968-5-10 refuted; 1970-??-?? certain (preferred). Superseded here: delta 0: 1968-05-10 at `certain` (run `corpus v1 / phase3b`). The telling is dated by its lecture, so with the refuted date removed from consideration the surviving claim is what the telling inherits, at that claim own confidence and no higher.
  2. 10 May 1968 stated · refuted
    Source The Divine BodyThe Divine Body (nid 1036), telling 1036-3, told 1968-05-10
    Reasoning || v1.1/l7/told-close: the delivery claim this was derived from (nid 1036, 1968-5-10) was refuted by the L7 adjudication (#2363). The corrected told claim from the same lecture stands at 1970-?-?. This row is retired rather than deleted so the derivation history remains readable.
Sources

Source

  • The Divine Body ¶18 (He said, “I am dressed for the entire voyage, Mr. Goddard. We have our breakfast between 8:00 and 9:00, our lunch between 12:00 and 1:00, and our dinner between 5:00 and 6:00.)