Neville describes his delight in his daughter — how thrilled he is that she is his daughter, how happy he is when she comes home, and that he could never be too tired to welcome her.
Date (happened)
before 1969
bound · possible
Source
qualifying source passages 528485; telling lecture nids 1037
Reasoning
Qualifying passage ids [528485] belong to telling lecture nids [1037]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1969 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1969 is the MIN across telling lectures.
before 25 November 1966
bound
Source
Present-tense description in passage 528485, carried by lecture nid 1037 with direct dateline 1966-11-25.
Reasoning
Neville says he is thrilled that Victoria is his daughter and happy whenever she comes home, establishing the described relationship before he uttered the passage. Lecture 1037 has a direct, certain 1966-11-25 dateline, so the event is bounded before that day. The parallel witness on nid 2190 supports the same date but is not needed to exceed the carrier's certainty.
Told / reported
25 November 1966
estimated
Source
nid 1037 surviving delivery claim after refutation. All claims: 1957-??-?? refuted; 1969-3-26 refuted; 1966-11-25 certain (preferred)
Why
Lane L7 (#2354) re-derivation. Supersedes in substance, not in storage, the refuted-date told claim(s) on this event; those rows stand per append-only.
Reasoning
Re-derived, not walked down. The existing told claim(s) on this event took their date from a delivery claim on node 1037 that the corpus has since REFUTED, so the corpus was asserting that Neville told this on a day it separately says he did not lecture. That is a contradiction rather than an over-confidence, and lowering the confidence would have hidden it instead of resolving it. The refutation stands and the told claim is the wrong side of it. Node 1037 surviving (non-refuted) claim: 1966-11-25 at `certain`. All claims on the node: 1957-??-?? refuted; 1969-3-26 refuted; 1966-11-25 certain (preferred). Superseded here: delta 0: 1969-03-26 at `certain` (run `corpus v1 / phase3b`). The telling is dated by its lecture, so with the refuted date removed from consideration the surviving claim is what the telling inherits, at that claim own confidence and no higher.
26 March 1969
stated · refuted
Source
The Eternal Father (nid 1037), telling 1037-4, told 1969-03-26
Reasoning
|| v1.1/l7/told-close: the delivery claim this was derived from (nid 1037, 1969-3-26) was refuted by the L7 adjudication (#2363). The corrected told claim from the same lecture stands at 1966-11-25. This row is retired rather than deleted so the derivation history remains readable.
Sources
Source
- The Eternal Father ¶41 (I look into my daughter’s eyes and I am so thrilled that she is my daughter. I’m so happy whenever she comes home. I could never be too tired to welcome her, and she could never stay late enough for me.)