Neville awakens from the dream of life within his skull

Twelve years earlier in that same city Neville awoke from the dream of life, found himself buried in his own skull, and came out of that sepulcher.
Date (happened)
c. 1946
unresolved
  1. c. 1946 stated · preferred
    Source Who Is the Son of Man ¶10"twelve years ago", told in Who Is the Son of Man (nid 1041)
  2. 1959 estimated · probable
    Source Who Is the Son of Man ¶10Passage says the awakening was twelve years earlier; carrier nid 1041 is independently anchored to 1971 and the awakening is independently established in 1959.
    Why Append-only correction; candidate identity with events 7405 and 8125 remains unmerged.
    Reasoning The legacy 1946 year is the arithmetic result of subtracting twelve from the refuted 1958 catalogue date. Lecture 1041's surviving internal chronology places the telling in 1971, and the same packet records the awakening independently at 1959; twelve years earlier therefore supports 1959. Probable because the carrier itself is year-only probable.
Place
San Francisco
Persons
Neville Goddard
Told / reported
  1. 1971 conclusion · probable
    Why dc1-agreement-20261004, pm-actor-551 (PM 8702)
    Reasoning 1 claim, no conflict: 1971 (node:1041).
  2. 1971 estimated · probable
    Source Who Is the Son of Mannid 1041 surviving delivery claim after refutation. All claims: 1958-1-27 refuted; 1971-??-?? probable (preferred)
    Why Lane L7 (#2354) re-derivation. Supersedes in substance, not in storage, the refuted-date told claim(s) on this event; those rows stand per append-only.
    Reasoning Re-derived, not walked down. The existing told claim(s) on this event took their date from a delivery claim on node 1041 that the corpus has since REFUTED, so the corpus was asserting that Neville told this on a day it separately says he did not lecture. That is a contradiction rather than an over-confidence, and lowering the confidence would have hidden it instead of resolving it. The refutation stands and the told claim is the wrong side of it. Node 1041 surviving (non-refuted) claim: 1971-??-?? at `probable`. All claims on the node: 1958-1-27 refuted; 1971-??-?? probable (preferred). Superseded here: delta 0: 1958-01-27 at `certain` (run `corpus v1 / phase3b`) | delta 1: 1958-01-27 at `probable` (run `v1.1/l4/ceiling/c2`). The telling is dated by its lecture, so with the refuted date removed from consideration the surviving claim is what the telling inherits, at that claim own confidence and no higher.
  3. 27 January 1958 stated · refuted
    Source Who Is the Son of ManWho Is the Son of Man (nid 1041), telling 1041-4, told 1958-01-27
    Reasoning || v1.1/l7/told-close: the delivery claim this was derived from (nid 1041, 1958-1-27) was refuted by the L7 adjudication (#2363). The corrected told claim from the same lecture stands at 1971-?-?. This row is retired rather than deleted so the derivation history remains readable.
  4. 27 January 1958 stated · refuted
    Source Who Is the Son of ManWho Is the Son of Man (nid 1041), telling 1041-4, told 1958-01-27
    Why Corrects the confidence of the told claim written by run `corpus v1 / phase3b` at delta 0 on this event; that claim is left standing per append-only. Ceiling rule #2132.
    Reasoning Confidence only; the date is not re-adjudicated and is left exactly as written. This claim is derived from the delivery claims of node 1041 and asserts `certain`, but the strongest claim that node carries is `probable`, so there is nothing for `certain` to inherit from. nid 1041 delivery claims: 1958-1-27 refuted; 1971-??-?? probable. Walked back to `probable`, the ceiling. Whether the DATE is right is a separate question this row does not touch; if the evidence turns out to support more confidence, it will have to come from a source other than this node. || v1.1/l7/told-close: the delivery claim this was derived from (nid 1041, 1958-1-27) was refuted by the L7 adjudication (#2363). The corrected told claim from the same lecture stands at 1971-?-?. This row is retired rather than deleted so the derivation history remains readable.
Sources

Source

  • Who Is the Son of Man ¶10 (For in this City twelve years ago I awoke from the dream of life. I awoke to find myself buried in my own skull, as every one is but he doesn’t know it.)