Neville describes a second letter received the same day, from the woman's daughter, who saw in vision a monstrous thing about to bite her mother when Neville's face appeared instead of the monster's and the whole thing vanished.
Date (happened)
23 April 1971
stated · preferred
Why
Neville Corpus v1.1 L1.6 anchor reconciliation.
Reasoning
L1.6: copied at no greater confidence from the adjudicated preferred delivery claim of anchor node 1063.
20 October 1959
stated · doubtful
Reasoning
|| v1.1/l7/passage-inherit: lowered `certain` -> `doubtful`. This date was inherited from lecture node 1063, whose own 1959-10-20 delivery claim has been refuted, and no other node in the corpus holds that date live — so the only witness for this date is one the corpus has disproved. Lowered, never refuted (#2461 §1 rule (b)): what collapsed is the evidence for WHEN, not the event. This row was reached through a PASSAGE source, which every earlier rule-(b) pass was structurally blind to.
23 April 1971
stated
Why
Append-only passage-sourced correction; earlier rows remain.
Reasoning
Passage 529244 directly says the daughter's letter was received today. The authoritative adjudication for the sole carrier nid 1063 confirms 1971-04-23 and rejects 1959-10-20, so the passage supports an exact event date of 1971-04-23.
Told
23 April 1971
conclusion
Why
dc1-agreement-20261004, pm-actor-551 (PM 8702)
Reasoning
All 2 claims agree on 1971-04-23: node:1063; node:1063.
-
23 April 1971
stated
Why
Neville Corpus v1.1 L1.6 anchor reconciliation.
Reasoning
L1.6: copied at no greater confidence from the adjudicated preferred delivery claim of anchor node 1063.
Sources
Source
- Consigned to Disobedience ¶35 (She has seen me in the role . . and when this monstrous thing appeared and was just about to bite you, my face appeared; and she told you in the letter . . told me at least . . it was not the monster’s face, it was your face; and the whole thing vanished.)