Neville recalls that his brother was one of the eight sons who carried their father to the grave.
Date (happened)
between January 1959 and 6 November 1959
unresolved
between January 1959 and 6 November 1959
estimated · probable · preferred
Why
M7 dating pass (529; 525's readers, packet 002)
Reasoning
Passage 529270 (told 1959-11-06) speaks of the father as already buried; the chronology dates 'Death of Neville's father' to 1959 (5951) and has Neville dreaming of his dead father on 2-6 November 1959 (15157).
before 1969
bound · possible
Reasoning
Qualifying passage ids [529270] belong to telling lecture nids [1064]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1969 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1969 is the MIN across telling lectures.
before 6 November 1959
bound
Reasoning
Passage 529270 says Collin was one of the eight sons who bore Neville's father to the grave and places the father as already dead. The containing lecture node 1064 has an authoritative certain delivery date of 1959-11-06, so the burial certainly predates that day; the passage supports a bound, not an exact burial date.
Told
6 November 1959
estimated
Why
Lane L7 (#2354) re-derivation. Supersedes in substance, not in storage, the refuted-date told claim(s) on this event; those rows stand per append-only.
Reasoning
Re-derived, not walked down. The existing told claim(s) on this event took their date from a delivery claim on node 1064 that the corpus has since REFUTED, so the corpus was asserting that Neville told this on a day it separately says he did not lecture. That is a contradiction rather than an over-confidence, and lowering the confidence would have hidden it instead of resolving it. The refutation stands and the told claim is the wrong side of it. Node 1064 surviving (non-refuted) claim: 1959-11-6 at `certain`. All claims on the node: 1959-11-6 certain; 1969-4-6 refuted; 1959-11-6 certain (preferred). Superseded here: delta 0: 1969-04-06 at `certain` (run `corpus v1 / phase3b`). The telling is dated by its lecture, so with the refuted date removed from consideration the surviving claim is what the telling inherits, at that claim own confidence and no higher.
6 April 1969
stated · refuted
Reasoning
|| v1.1/l7/told-close: the delivery claim this was derived from (nid 1064, 1969-4-6) was refuted by the L7 adjudication (#2363). The corrected told claim from the same lecture stands at 1959-11-6. This row is retired rather than deleted so the derivation history remains readable.