Neville recounts a vision produced when Blake told him to fall backwards: he fell through space like a meteor toward one glorious radiant man whose heart was like living rubies, and on approaching found the body made of innumerable beings, races and nations, and recognised the man as himself.
Date (happened)
one night
relative · probable
before 1964
bound · possible
Reasoning
Qualifying passage ids [530085] belong to telling lecture nids [1094]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1964 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1964 is the MIN across telling lectures.
before 24 March 1964
bound · doubtful
Why
Tightens the phase4 L6a envelope from before 1964 to before 1964-03-24. || LOWERED certain -> doubtful: this bound was written at 2026-09-05 21:31 on a delivery claim the corpus then held at `certain`; another lane has since lowered the 1964-03-24 delivery claim on lecture nid 1094 to `doubtful`, so the telling date this bound rests on is no longer certain. The bound itself is not refuted — the event may well be before that day — but it can no longer be asserted at `certain`. #2344.
Reasoning
L6a envelope tightened to the telling day of nid 1094 (certain delivery 1964-03-24); same premise, finer precision. The phase4 L6a bound on this event is `before 1964`, an envelope over delivery YEARS computed without reading text. Its premise is that the fact is true by the time it is told; on that same premise the DAY of the telling is a strictly better upper bound. Nothing is re-decided — the bound is stated to the precision the evidence always supported. The delivery claim for 1964-03-24 on nid 1094 is held at `certain` by the corpus, which is what carries this claim. #2274; the L6a row stands beside this one.
Told / reported
5 April 1963
estimated
Why
Lane L7 (#2354) re-derivation. Supersedes in substance, not in storage, the refuted-date told claim(s) on this event; those rows stand per append-only.
Reasoning
Re-derived, not walked down. The existing told claim(s) on this event took their date from a delivery claim on node 1094 that the corpus has since REFUTED, so the corpus was asserting that Neville told this on a day it separately says he did not lecture. That is a contradiction rather than an over-confidence, and lowering the confidence would have hidden it instead of resolving it. The refutation stands and the told claim is the wrong side of it. Node 1094 surviving (non-refuted) claim: 1963-4-5 at `certain`. All claims on the node: 1963-4-5 certain; 1964-3-24 refuted; 1963-4-5 certain (preferred). Superseded here: delta 0: 1964-03-24 at `certain` (run `corpus v1 / phase3b`). The telling is dated by its lecture, so with the refuted date removed from consideration the surviving claim is what the telling inherits, at that claim own confidence and no higher.
24 March 1964
stated · refuted
Reasoning
|| v1.1/l7/told-close: the delivery claim this was derived from (nid 1094, 1964-3-24) was refuted by the L7 adjudication (#2363). The corrected told claim from the same lecture stands at 1963-4-5. This row is retired rather than deleted so the derivation history remains readable.
Sources
Source
- Barabbas or Jesus ¶38 (I saw it as clearly one night when Blake asked me to fall backwards and I did exactly what he told me to do to produce the vision. And here was one man, a glorious, radiant man. His heart was all like living rubies.)