He notes that his own experience of being embraced by God happened twelve years ago the coming month, and insists it was a gift he cannot boast of and that precedes others only in chronological order.
Date (happened)
May 1951
stated · preferred
Source
"it’s twelve years this coming month", told in Who Is the Real Messiah (nid 1096)
July 1959
relative · probable
Source
Passage 530112 says twelve years this coming month; node 1096 survives at 1971-06-11 probable.
Reasoning
At the probable 11 June 1971 telling, 'twelve years this coming month' identifies July 1959. Day precision is unavailable, and confidence cannot exceed the carrier lecture's probable claim.
c. 1959
stated · probable
May 1951
stated · refuted
Source
Passage 530112 was formerly interpreted against the now-refuted 1963-04-09 delivery claim.
Reasoning
The month/year calculation depended on a carrier date the corpus has refuted, so 1951-05 cannot remain a supported happening date.
Told / reported
11 June 1971
conclusion · probable
Why
dc1-agreement-20261004, pm-actor-551 (PM 8702)
Reasoning
1 claim, no conflict: 1971-06-11 (node:1096).
11 June 1971
estimated · probable
Source
nid 1096 surviving delivery claim after refutation. All claims: 1963-4-9 refuted; 1971-6-11 probable (preferred)
Why
Lane L7 (#2354) re-derivation. Supersedes in substance, not in storage, the refuted-date told claim(s) on this event; those rows stand per append-only.
Reasoning
Re-derived, not walked down. The existing told claim(s) on this event took their date from a delivery claim on node 1096 that the corpus has since REFUTED, so the corpus was asserting that Neville told this on a day it separately says he did not lecture. That is a contradiction rather than an over-confidence, and lowering the confidence would have hidden it instead of resolving it. The refutation stands and the told claim is the wrong side of it. Node 1096 surviving (non-refuted) claim: 1971-6-11 at `probable`. All claims on the node: 1963-4-9 refuted; 1971-6-11 probable (preferred). Superseded here: delta 0: 1963-04-09 at `certain` (run `corpus v1 / phase3b`) | delta 1: 1963-04-09 at `probable` (run `v1.1/l4/ceiling/c2`). The telling is dated by its lecture, so with the refuted date removed from consideration the surviving claim is what the telling inherits, at that claim own confidence and no higher.
9 April 1963
stated · refuted
Source
Who Is the Real Messiah (nid 1096), telling 1096-2, told 1963-04-09
Reasoning
|| v1.1/l7/told-close: the delivery claim this was derived from (nid 1096, 1963-4-9) was refuted by the L7 adjudication (#2363). The corrected told claim from the same lecture stands at 1971-6-11. This row is retired rather than deleted so the derivation history remains readable.
9 April 1963
stated · refuted
Source
Who Is the Real Messiah (nid 1096), telling 1096-2, told 1963-04-09
Why
Corrects the confidence of the told claim written by run `corpus v1 / phase3b` at delta 0 on this event; that claim is left standing per append-only. Ceiling rule #2132.
Reasoning
Confidence only; the date is not re-adjudicated and is left exactly as written. This claim is derived from the delivery claims of node 1096 and asserts `certain`, but the strongest claim that node carries is `probable`, so there is nothing for `certain` to inherit from. nid 1096 delivery claims: 1963-4-9 possible; 1971-6-11 probable. Walked back to `probable`, the ceiling. Whether the DATE is right is a separate question this row does not touch; if the evidence turns out to support more confidence, it will have to come from a source other than this node. || v1.1/l7/told-close: the delivery claim this was derived from (nid 1096, 1963-4-9) was refuted by the L7 adjudication (#2363). The corrected told claim from the same lecture stands at 1971-6-11. This row is retired rather than deleted so the derivation history remains readable.
Sources
Source
- Jehovah's Messiah ¶26 (So if I preceded you – undoubtedly I have by a few years – it’s twelve years this coming month that it happened to me.)