Neville buys a suit that a friend takes

He bought a suit from his tailor without knowing why; his wife would not let it into the house, and a friend who wanted just such a suit then took it.
Date (happened)
before 1969
unresolved
  1. before 1969 bound · possible
    Source Walk by Faith ¶20qualifying source passages 530813; telling lecture nids 1121
    Reasoning Qualifying passage ids [530813] belong to telling lecture nids [1121]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1969 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1969 is the MIN across telling lectures.
  2. before 6 November 1967 bound
    Source Walk by Faith
    Why M7 dating pass (529; 525's readers, packet 040)
    Reasoning Same basis as 15380.
Persons
Catherine Willa Van Schmus
Neville Goddard
Told / reported
  1. 6 November 1967 estimated
    Source Walk by Faithnid 1121 surviving delivery claim after refutation. All claims: 1964-1-6 refuted; 1967-11-6 certain; 1969-9-22 refuted; 1967-11-6 certain (preferred)
    Why Lane L7 (#2354) re-derivation. Supersedes in substance, not in storage, the refuted-date told claim(s) on this event; those rows stand per append-only.
    Reasoning Re-derived, not walked down. The existing told claim(s) on this event took their date from a delivery claim on node 1121 that the corpus has since REFUTED, so the corpus was asserting that Neville told this on a day it separately says he did not lecture. That is a contradiction rather than an over-confidence, and lowering the confidence would have hidden it instead of resolving it. The refutation stands and the told claim is the wrong side of it. Node 1121 surviving (non-refuted) claim: 1967-11-6 at `certain`. All claims on the node: 1964-1-6 refuted; 1967-11-6 certain; 1969-9-22 refuted; 1967-11-6 certain (preferred). Superseded here: delta 0: 1969-09-22 at `certain` (run `corpus v1 / phase3b`). The telling is dated by its lecture, so with the refuted date removed from consideration the surviving claim is what the telling inherits, at that claim own confidence and no higher.
  2. 22 September 1969 stated · refuted
    Source Walk by FaithWalk by Faith (nid 1121), telling 1121-5, told 1969-09-22
    Reasoning || v1.1/l7/told-close: the delivery claim this was derived from (nid 1121, 1969-9-22) was refuted by the L7 adjudication (#2363). The corrected told claim from the same lecture stands at 1967-11-6. This row is retired rather than deleted so the derivation history remains readable.
Sources

Source

  • Walk by Faith ¶20 (I have bought clothes, brought them home, and wondered what possessed me to buy them. I did it because someone was treading in the winepress elsewhere.)