Neville receives his teaching through revelation

Neville insists his teaching is not theory but personal experience, received - like Paul - through a revelation of Jesus Christ rather than from any man.
Date (happened)
before 1969
unresolved
  1. before 19 October 1969 bound · possible · preferred
    Source I AM the Cause
    Why M7 dating pass (529; 525's readers, packet 044)
    Reasoning Telling lecture nid 1145 probable delivery 1969-10-19.
  2. before 1969 bound · possible
    Source I AM the Cause ¶38qualifying source passages 531469; telling lecture nids 1145
    Reasoning Qualifying passage ids [531469] belong to telling lecture nids [1145]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1969 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1969 is the MIN across telling lectures.
Persons
Neville Goddard
Paul
Told / reported
  1. 19 October 1969 estimated · probable
    Source I AM the Causenid 1145 surviving delivery claim after refutation. All claims: 1964-2-24 refuted; 1969-5-2 refuted; 1969-10-19 probable (preferred)
    Why Lane L7 (#2354) re-derivation. Supersedes in substance, not in storage, the refuted-date told claim(s) on this event; those rows stand per append-only.
    Reasoning Re-derived, not walked down. The existing told claim(s) on this event took their date from a delivery claim on node 1145 that the corpus has since REFUTED, so the corpus was asserting that Neville told this on a day it separately says he did not lecture. That is a contradiction rather than an over-confidence, and lowering the confidence would have hidden it instead of resolving it. The refutation stands and the told claim is the wrong side of it. Node 1145 surviving (non-refuted) claim: 1969-10-19 at `probable`. All claims on the node: 1964-2-24 refuted; 1969-5-2 refuted; 1969-10-19 probable (preferred). Superseded here: delta 0: 1969-05-02 at `certain` (run `corpus v1 / phase3b`). The telling is dated by its lecture, so with the refuted date removed from consideration the surviving claim is what the telling inherits, at that claim own confidence and no higher.
  2. 2 May 1969 stated · refuted
    Source I AM the CauseI AM the Cause (nid 1145), telling 1145-3, told 1969-05-02
    Reasoning || v1.1/l7/told-close: the delivery claim this was derived from (nid 1145, 1969-5-2) was refuted by the L7 adjudication (#2363). The corrected told claim from the same lecture stands at 1969-10-19. This row is retired rather than deleted so the derivation history remains readable.
Sources

Source

  • I AM the Cause ¶38 (This I know from personal experience. I am not speculating. I am not theorizing. I did not hear it from a man, nor was I taught it.)