Carter describes Neville as constantly comparing his own experience with Paul's from the platform, doing everything but saying 'I am Paul'.
Carter describes Neville as constantly comparing his own experience with Paul's from the platform, doing everything but saying 'I am Paul'. [Place: Neville's lecture platform (venue unspecified)]
Date (happened)
17 April 1967
estimated · probable · preferred
Why
Resolves npr:70244's 'held for individual reading'; existing before-1966/before-1967 envelope bounds (d0, d1) and the field_told rows sourced from the same lecture are left standing, append-only.
Reasoning
Neville comparing his own experience to Paul's is itself the speech act witnessed in this passage, so per the house rule this dates field_date, not field_told, even though the corpus's existing told claims (d1-d3) already used this lecture's date under field_told for a different reason (those are left standing, not altered). The lecture's own 1966-12-27 delivery claim is refuted (the Passion cannot be dramatized 'this coming Friday' in December); its surviving claim is 1967-04-17 at probable, which this claim inherits as its ceiling. This resolves the L4.5 flag (npr:70244) that asked for individual reading: only one lecture witnesses this event, so the envelope reduces to that lecture's own date, and a specific day is available where the standing envelope rows recorded only a year-level upper bound.
before 1966
bound · possible
Reasoning
Qualifying passage ids [542850] belong to telling lecture nids [1750]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1966 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1966 is the MIN across telling lectures.
before 1967
bound · possible
Why
Corrects the phase4 L6a envelope on this event from before 1966 to before 1967.
Reasoning
Envelope recompute, arithmetic only. The phase4 L6a row on this event states its own rule: each telling lecture contributes MAX of its non-refuted delivery years, and the envelope is the MIN across telling lectures. Recomputed live over lecture nid(s) 1750 that row cites, MAX(non-refuted field_delivery_year) gives 1967, not the 1966 the row carries — the bound was below its own stated rule and therefore UNSAFE: it asserted the event did not happen in 1 year(s) where it may sit. Same premise, same evidence, no re-reading and no re-judgement; only the maximum was taken correctly. The L6a row stands beside this one (append-only). Ruling: #2235 delta 1, architect 378.
Verbatim (witness's words)
Now you know that Neville constantly compared his experience with Paul. He did everything but say, I am Paul. Paul was on the page. Neville was in history.
Told
31 October 1976
stated · preferred
Source
NGR ep.45, Carter lecture 5, 1976-10-31
17 April 1967
estimated · probable
Why
Lane L7 (#2354) re-derivation. Supersedes in substance, not in storage, the refuted-date told claim(s) on this event; those rows stand per append-only.
Reasoning
Re-derived, not walked down. The existing told claim(s) on this event took their date from a delivery claim on node 1750 that the corpus has since REFUTED, so the corpus was asserting that Neville told this on a day it separately says he did not lecture. That is a contradiction rather than an over-confidence, and lowering the confidence would have hidden it instead of resolving it. The refutation stands and the told claim is the wrong side of it. Node 1750 surviving (non-refuted) claim: 1967-4-17 at `probable`. All claims on the node: 1966-12-27 refuted; 1967-4-17 probable (preferred). Superseded here: delta 1: 1966-12-27 at `certain` (run `corpus v1 / phase3b`) | delta 2: 1966-12-27 at `probable` (run `v1.1/l4/ceiling/c2`). The telling is dated by its lecture, so with the refuted date removed from consideration the surviving claim is what the telling inherits, at that claim own confidence and no higher.
27 December 1966
stated · refuted
Reasoning
|| v1.1/l7/told-close: the delivery claim this was derived from (nid 1750, 1966-12-27) was refuted by the L7 adjudication (#2363). The corrected told claim from the same lecture stands at 1967-4-17. This row is retired rather than deleted so the derivation history remains readable.
27 December 1966
stated · refuted
Why
Corrects the confidence of the told claim written by run `corpus v1 / phase3b` at delta 1 on this event; that claim is left standing per append-only. Ceiling rule #2132.
Reasoning
Confidence only; the date is not re-adjudicated and is left exactly as written. This claim is derived from the delivery claims of node 1750 and asserts `certain`, but the strongest claim that node carries is `probable`, so there is nothing for `certain` to inherit from. nid 1750 delivery claims: 1966-12-27 refuted; 1967-4-17 probable. Walked back to `probable`, the ceiling. Whether the DATE is right is a separate question this row does not touch; if the evidence turns out to support more confidence, it will have to come from a source other than this node. || v1.1/l7/told-close: the delivery claim this was derived from (nid 1750, 1966-12-27) was refuted by the L7 adjudication (#2363). The corrected told claim from the same lecture stands at 1967-4-17. This row is retired rather than deleted so the derivation history remains readable.