He describes his own known background: an earthly father and mother, brothers and a sister, a large family, no education, no wealth and no social position.
Date (happened)
28 February 1969
unresolved
before 1965
bound · possible
Reasoning
Qualifying passage ids [532790] belong to telling lecture nids [1196]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1965 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1965 is the MIN across telling lectures.
before 1969
bound · possible
Why
Corrects the phase4 L6a envelope on this event from before 1965 to before 1969.
Reasoning
Envelope recompute, arithmetic only. The phase4 L6a row on this event states its own rule: each telling lecture contributes MAX of its non-refuted delivery years, and the envelope is the MIN across telling lectures. Recomputed live over lecture nid(s) 1196 that row cites, MAX(non-refuted field_delivery_year) gives 1969, not the 1965 the row carries — the bound was below its own stated rule and therefore UNSAFE: it asserted the event did not happen in 4 year(s) where it may sit. Same premise, same evidence, no re-reading and no re-judgement; only the maximum was taken correctly. The L6a row stands beside this one (append-only). Ruling: #2235 delta 1, architect 378.
28 February 1969
estimated
Reasoning
The description occurs in the speaking present. Authoritative adjudication establishes node 1196 delivery at 1969-02-28 certain.
Told / reported
28 February 1969
estimated · probable
Why
Lane L7 (#2354) re-derivation. Supersedes in substance, not in storage, the refuted-date told claim(s) on this event; those rows stand per append-only.
Reasoning
Re-derived, not walked down. The existing told claim(s) on this event took their date from a delivery claim on node 1196 that the corpus has since REFUTED, so the corpus was asserting that Neville told this on a day it separately says he did not lecture. That is a contradiction rather than an over-confidence, and lowering the confidence would have hidden it instead of resolving it. The refutation stands and the told claim is the wrong side of it. Node 1196 surviving (non-refuted) claim: 1969-2-28 at `probable`. All claims on the node: 1965-3-5 refuted; 1969-2-28 probable (preferred). Superseded here: delta 0: 1965-03-05 at `certain` (run `corpus v1 / phase3b`) | delta 1: 1965-03-05 at `probable` (run `v1.1/l4/ceiling/c2`). The telling is dated by its lecture, so with the refuted date removed from consideration the surviving claim is what the telling inherits, at that claim own confidence and no higher.
5 March 1965
stated · refuted
Reasoning
|| v1.1/l7/told-close: the delivery claim this was derived from (nid 1196, 1965-3-5) was refuted by the L7 adjudication (#2363). The corrected told claim from the same lecture stands at 1969-2-28. This row is retired rather than deleted so the derivation history remains readable.
5 March 1965
stated · refuted
Why
Corrects the confidence of the told claim written by run `corpus v1 / phase3b` at delta 0 on this event; that claim is left standing per append-only. Ceiling rule #2132.
Reasoning
Confidence only; the date is not re-adjudicated and is left exactly as written. This claim is derived from the delivery claims of node 1196 and asserts `certain`, but the strongest claim that node carries is `probable`, so there is nothing for `certain` to inherit from. nid 1196 delivery claims: 1965-3-5 possible; 1969-2-28 probable. Walked back to `probable`, the ceiling. Whether the DATE is right is a separate question this row does not touch; if the evidence turns out to support more confidence, it will have to come from a source other than this node. || v1.1/l7/told-close: the delivery claim this was derived from (nid 1196, 1965-3-5) was refuted by the L7 adjudication (#2363). The corrected told claim from the same lecture stands at 1969-2-28. This row is retired rather than deleted so the derivation history remains readable.
Sources
Source
- Believe in Him ¶14 (My background is known. I have no education, no wealth or social position, yet I do know that I was chosen to be called and incorporated into the body of love and sent.)