High-rise development surrounds Neville's home

He tells how four and a half years ago they moved to their present home when there was not a tall building in the area, and now thirty- and sixteen-story buildings have gone up around it and the area is about to be rezoned.
Date (happened)
c. 1961
unresolved
  1. c. 1961 stated · preferred
    Source The Law: Self-Circumcision ¶41"Four years ago", told in The Law: Self-Circumcision (nid 1209)
  2. between 28 November 1960 and 28 May 1961 estimated · probable
    Reasoning Four and four-and-a-half years before authoritative 1965-05-28 yield a 1960-11-28 through 1961-05-28 estimated window.
Persons
Told / reported
  1. 28 May 1965 conclusion
    Why dc1-agreement-20261004, pm-actor-551 (PM 8702)
    Reasoning 1 claim, no conflict: 1965-05-28 (node:1209).
  2. 28 May 1965 estimated
    Source The Law: Self-Circumcisionnid 1209 surviving delivery claim after refutation. All claims: 1965-2-19 refuted; 1965-5-28 certain; 1968-??-?? refuted; 1965-5-28 certain (preferred)
    Why Lane L7 (#2354) re-derivation. Supersedes in substance, not in storage, the refuted-date told claim(s) on this event; those rows stand per append-only.
    Reasoning Re-derived, not walked down. The existing told claim(s) on this event took their date from a delivery claim on node 1209 that the corpus has since REFUTED, so the corpus was asserting that Neville told this on a day it separately says he did not lecture. That is a contradiction rather than an over-confidence, and lowering the confidence would have hidden it instead of resolving it. The refutation stands and the told claim is the wrong side of it. Node 1209 surviving (non-refuted) claim: 1965-5-28 at `certain`. All claims on the node: 1965-2-19 refuted; 1965-5-28 certain; 1968-??-?? refuted; 1965-5-28 certain (preferred). Superseded here: delta 0: 1968-00-00 at `certain` (run `corpus v1 / phase3b`). The telling is dated by its lecture, so with the refuted date removed from consideration the surviving claim is what the telling inherits, at that claim own confidence and no higher.
  3. 1968 stated · refuted
    Source The Law: Self-CircumcisionThe Law: Self-Circumcision (nid 1209), telling 1209-7, told 1968
    Reasoning || v1.1/l7/told-close: the delivery claim this was derived from (nid 1209, 1968--) was refuted by the L7 adjudication (#2363). The corrected told claim from the same lecture stands at 1965-5-28. This row is retired rather than deleted so the derivation history remains readable.
Sources

Source

  • The Law: Self-Circumcision ¶41 (Four years ago we moved where we are now; we’ve been there for four and a half years; there wasn’t a tall building in the area. Come see where I live now. There are thirty-story buildings, sixteen-story buildings, all kinds of buildings, and more and mor…)
1 tellings, oldest first. A date in brackets shows how it is known; "circa", "after" and "possible" dates are rough.
Date Lecture or book Telling Passage
1965-05-28 [exact/certain/final] The Law: Self-Circumcision How do you know that what you’re demonstrating is the best thing for you? Well, my dear, I don’t really care whether it’s the best or not. If I want it today and getting it tomorrow I discover I don’t want it then give it away. I’ve done that with a suit, with a hat, with a pair of shoes. I thought I must have them, so I got them, and then I wondered what possessed me when I thought I wanted them. I gave it away. So it is the joy of getting them and, may I tell you, the equal joy in giving them away. Those who received them from me thought, “Oh isn’t it marvelous!” They were thrilled to… 533227