Neville retells his own 'feed my pig' vision, in which he told his daughter to take whatever she needed from the bins without money and feed his pig, the symbol of Christ, and found the pig grown but thin from neglect.
Date (happened)
before 28 April 1967
unresolved
before 28 April 1967
bound · probable
Source
bound from the telling lecture nid 1317 (1967-04-28)
Reasoning
The event is told in the past tense in nid 1317, delivered 1967-04-28 (that claim's confidence: probable, preferred), so it had happened by that date. This is the same premise phase4 L6a and L4.5 rest on, stated at the precision the evidence actually supports rather than as a fabricated year. It replaces nothing: the 1900 placeholder row remains, lowered, as the record of what phase3b did. `bound` is never `preferred`, so this does not change what the event displays.
before 1900
bound · refuted
Why
pm-actor-525: refuted by the M7 dating pass (529; 525's readers, packet 015): the 1900..1999 'before' row is a phase-3b placeholder sentinel meaning 'sometime before the telling'; no source states it and it precedes his own birth in 1905. The honest 'before 1967-04-28' bound stands beside it.
Reasoning
v1.1/l0.5/retype/w1-conv: type stated -> bound. Convergence of the w1 pass, which split on this exact shape — 25 rows with the 1900 sentinel year and a vague relative note were judged `stated` while 5 identical rows were judged `bound`. The 1900 here is a placeholder meaning "unknown, sometime before the telling", not a date any source stated; Neville was born in 1905, so "before 1900" is not a coherent bound on his own recollections. A claim whose year is that sentinel cannot be `stated`. Note the year itself remains wrong and is out of scope for L0.5, which may touch only `type` and `preferred` — reported separately. Source note as recorded: ""when I was in San Diego", told in Closing Summary 1967 (nid 1317)" || v1.1/l1.4/sentinel1900: year 1900 here is not a date. `corpus v1 / phase3b` emitted it as a placeholder for "unknown, sometime before the telling" whenever the speaker used a vague temporal phrase — this row's own source note is the phrase. The same sentinel was identified and converged on in run v1.1/l0.5/retype/w1-conv. It carried confidence `probable`, which no evidence supported. Lowered to `doubtful`; an honest `before 1967-04-28` bound is appended alongside from the telling lecture (nid 1317). Nothing deleted, no year invented.
Told / reported
28 December 1967
stated · doubtful
28 December 1967
stated · doubtful
Why
Corrects the confidence of the told claim written by run `corpus v1 / phase3b` at delta 0 on this event; that claim is left standing per append-only. Ceiling rule #2132.
Reasoning
Confidence only; the date is not re-adjudicated and is left exactly as written. This claim is derived from the delivery claims of node 1317 and asserts `certain`, but the strongest claim that node carries is `probable`, so there is nothing for `certain` to inherit from. nid 1317 delivery claims: 1967-12-28 doubtful; 1967-4-28 probable. Walked back to `probable`, the ceiling. Whether the DATE is right is a separate question this row does not touch; if the evidence turns out to support more confidence, it will have to come from a source other than this node.
Sources
Source
- Closing Summary 1967 ¶9 (The story is I asked my daughter to go and get all these things from the bins, and she said, “What would I use for money, Daddy?” I said, “You don’t need money—all this is mine. This belongs to us. Take anything and bring it to me, and feed my pig, the s…)