Neville recalls asking his brother Victor why he did not give responsibility to their brothers Cecil, Fred and Collin, and Victor answering that they were not qualified and would lose the business.
Date (happened)
before 1968
bound · possible
Reasoning
Qualifying passage ids [539302] belong to telling lecture nids [1407]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1968 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1968 is the MIN across telling lectures.
before 6 December 1968
bound
Reasoning
The conversation with Victor is a past, definite occurrence recounted at the lecture, so it predates the telling; the corrected chrome-derived delivery date (1968-12-06, certain) is a tighter, more accurate upper bound than the stale year-level 'before 1968' envelope, which was computed before the chrome correction and did not use the day-level date.
Told / reported
9 December 1968
stated · doubtful
6 December 1968
estimated
Reasoning
The lecture's own transcript byline reads 12/6/68 (certain, preferred), contradicting only the day (6 vs 9) of the catalogue claim (#500, doubtful) that the existing certain told claim on this event was derived from. The telling cannot be more confident than the delivery claim it rests on, and the correct delivery claim is 1968-12-06; the existing told row's day is wrong and this is the correction, left standing beside it per append-only.
Sources
Source
- Partakers of the Divine Nature ¶25 (And so I asked him one day, why don’t you give responsibility to my brother Cecil and to Fred and to Collin? He said, “I can’t. They’re not qualified to do it and I’ve done it so long before they came into the business, I don’t feel that they could do it…)