David reveals Neville as Father 139 days after his awakening

One hundred and thirty-nine days after his awakening and rising from the tomb, David, God's only begotten son, appeared and revealed Neville as his father.
Date (happened)
6 December 1959
unresolved
  1. 6 December 1959 stated · preferred
    Source God Became Man ¶4"One hundred and thirty-nine days after I awoke and rose from my tomb", told in God Became Man (nid 1423)
  2. before 1965 bound · possible
    Source Advent ¶24qualifying source passages 532188; telling lecture nids 1175
    Reasoning Qualifying passage ids [532188] belong to telling lecture nids [1175]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1965 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1965 is the MIN across telling lectures.
  3. before 13 December 1965 bound · doubtful
    Source Adventtelling lecture nid 1175, certain delivery 1965-12-13
    Why Tightens the phase4 L6a envelope from before 1965 to before 1965-12-13.
    Reasoning L6a envelope tightened to the telling day of nid 1175 (certain delivery 1965-12-13); same premise, finer precision. The phase4 L6a bound on this event is `before 1965`, an envelope over delivery YEARS computed without reading text. Its premise is that the fact is true by the time it is told; on that same premise the DAY of the telling is a strictly better upper bound. Nothing is re-decided — the bound is stated to the precision the evidence always supported. The delivery claim for 1965-12-13 on nid 1175 is held at `certain` by the corpus, which is what carries this claim. #2274; the L6a row stands beside this one. || v1.1/l7/passage-inherit: lowered `certain` -> `doubtful`. This date was inherited from lecture node 1175, whose own 1965-12-13 delivery claim has been refuted, and no other node in the corpus holds that date live — so the only witness for this date is one the corpus has disproved. Lowered, never refuted (#2461 §1 rule (b)): what collapsed is the evidence for WHEN, not the event. This row was reached through a PASSAGE source, which every earlier rule-(b) pass was structurally blind to.
  4. before 30 November 1965 bound
    Reasoning The second sign was completed before this telling. Authoritative adjudication fixes node 1175 at 1965-11-30 certain and rejects 1965-12-13, supporting a corrected upper bound.
  5. between 26 November 1959 and 20 December 1959 estimated · probable
    Why M7 dating pass (529; 525's readers, packet 012)
    Reasoning David is the second sign, given months after 20 July 1959 (passage 532188 gives no date). The chronology holds four different certain-dated variants (15423 on 26 Nov, 16865 on 6 Dec by his 139-day count, 18828 c. Dec, 7860 on 20 Dec), so a single day is over-precise; the window covers all of them.
Told / reported
  1. 24 February 1969 stated
    Source God Became ManGod Became Man (nid 1423), telling 1423-2, told 1969-02-24
  2. 30 November 1965 estimated · probable
    Source Adventnid 1175 surviving delivery claim after refutation. All claims: 1964-11-27 refuted; 1964-11-27 refuted; 1965-12-13 refuted; 1965-11-30 probable (preferred)
    Why Lane L7 (#2354) re-derivation. Supersedes in substance, not in storage, the refuted-date told claim(s) on this event; those rows stand per append-only.
    Reasoning Re-derived, not walked down. The existing told claim(s) on this event took their date from a delivery claim on node 1175 that the corpus has since REFUTED, so the corpus was asserting that Neville told this on a day it separately says he did not lecture. That is a contradiction rather than an over-confidence, and lowering the confidence would have hidden it instead of resolving it. The refutation stands and the told claim is the wrong side of it. Node 1175 surviving (non-refuted) claim: 1965-11-30 at `probable`. All claims on the node: 1964-11-27 refuted; 1964-11-27 refuted; 1965-12-13 refuted; 1965-11-30 probable (preferred). Superseded here: delta 0: 1965-12-13 at `certain` (run `corpus v1 / phase3b`). The telling is dated by its lecture, so with the refuted date removed from consideration the surviving claim is what the telling inherits, at that claim own confidence and no higher.
  3. 13 December 1965 stated · refuted
    Source AdventAdvent (nid 1175), telling 1175-4, told 1965-12-13
    Reasoning || v1.1/l7/told-close: the delivery claim this was derived from (nid 1175, 1965-12-13) was refuted by the L7 adjudication (#2363). The corrected told claim from the same lecture stands at 1965-11-30. This row is retired rather than deleted so the derivation history remains readable.
Sources

Source

  • God Became Man ¶4 (One hundred and thirty-nine days after I awoke and rose from my tomb, God’s only begotten son, David, revealed me as his father.)
  • Advent ¶24 (The second one he gives me. Because he gives me two in fulfillment of the 9th of Isaiah: Upon this day “to us a child is born, a son is given” (verse 6).)