The same woman who had seen Neville in the crucified form told him she had seen her mother, dead many years, as a young girl, who spoke to her and introduced her to her present husband.
Date (happened)
before 24 June 1969
unresolved
before 24 June 1969
bound
Why
Supersedes in substance, not in storage, the 1900..1999 sentinel bound flagged unresolved by npr:60878/61766; that row stands per append-only.
Reasoning
The existing bound (1900..1999, certain) is a database sentinel flagged by two prior L0.5 passes as an unfixed defect: 'the YEAR remains wrong ... reported separately'. The only real bound available is that the woman's story was recounted to Neville at this lecture, so it happened before the telling. The telling is certainly in 1969, on either 23 or 24 June depending on which delivery claim is right; bounding at 'before 1969-06-24' is safe under both candidates and replaces the sentinel with an evidenced, far tighter bound. || v1.1 type repair: written as `estimated` by run v1.1/l4/c0y, retyped `bound` — a `before` claim is an outer limit, which the lane brief and 97% of the corpus type as `bound`.
before 23 June 1969
bound
Source
bound from the telling lecture nid 1467 (1969-06-23)
Reasoning
The event is told in the past tense in nid 1467, delivered 1969-06-23 (that claim's confidence: certain, preferred), so it had happened by that date. This is the same premise phase4 L6a and L4.5 rest on, stated at the precision the evidence actually supports rather than as a fabricated year. It replaces nothing: the 1900 placeholder row remains, lowered, as the record of what phase3b did. `bound` is never `preferred`, so this does not change what the event displays.
before 1900
bound · refuted
Why
pm-actor-525: refuted by the M7 dating pass (529; 525's readers, packet 025): The 1900..1999 year is a database placeholder for 'sometime before the telling', not a date any source gave; a bound before 1900 is incoherent for a story told to Neville in the 1960s. The honest bound is before 1969-06-23.
Reasoning
v1.1/l0.5/retype/w1-conv: type stated -> bound. Convergence of the w1 pass, which split on this exact shape — 25 rows with the 1900 sentinel year and a vague relative note were judged `stated` while 5 identical rows were judged `bound`. The 1900 here is a placeholder meaning "unknown, sometime before the telling", not a date any source stated; Neville was born in 1905, so "before 1900" is not a coherent bound on his own recollections. A claim whose year is that sentinel cannot be `stated`. Note the year itself remains wrong and is out of scope for L0.5, which may touch only `type` and `preferred` — reported separately. Source note as recorded: ""who has been gone from this world many years", told in The Forming of Christ in You (nid 1467)" || v1.1/l1.4/sentinel1900: year 1900 here is not a date. `corpus v1 / phase3b` emitted it as a placeholder for "unknown, sometime before the telling" whenever the speaker used a vague temporal phrase — this row's own source note is the phrase. The same sentinel was identified and converged on in run v1.1/l0.5/retype/w1-conv. It carried confidence `certain`, which no evidence supported. Lowered to `doubtful`; an honest `before 1969-06-23` bound is appended alongside from the telling lecture (nid 1467). Nothing deleted, no year invented.
Told
24 June 1969
stated · doubtful
23 June 1969
estimated
Why
Same-day-value correction: the existing told claim used the weaker (doubtful) of two conflicting delivery claims on the same node.
Reasoning
The existing told claim (1969-06-24, certain) rests on nid 1467's DOUBTFUL delivery claim (catalog #572). The node's own CERTAIN claim, from its chrome dateline, is one day earlier: 1969-06-23. The catalog day was explicitly flagged for demotion by the chrome-harvest claim's own WHY note. Appending the date the node's strongest evidence actually supports.
Sources
Source
- The Forming of Christ in You ¶29 (The lady who saw me in the crucified form told me of seeing her mother (who has been gone from this world many years) as a young girl.)