Neville recounts hearing the heavenly chorus calling his name and singing of his redemption in 1946, a beauty that has stayed with him ever since.
Date (happened)
1946
conclusion
Why
dc1-agreement-20261004, pm-actor-551 (PM 8702)
Reasoning
All 5 claims agree on 1946: passage:540949; passage:530464; node:1110; passage:530464; passage:530464.
-
before 1968
bound · possible
Reasoning
Qualifying passage ids [530464] belong to telling lecture nids [1110]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1968 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1968 is the MIN across telling lectures.
before 4 October 1968
bound
Why
Tightens the phase4 L6a envelope from before 1968 to before 1968-10-04.
Reasoning
L6a envelope tightened to the telling day of nid 1110 (certain delivery 1968-10-04); same premise, finer precision. The phase4 L6a bound on this event is `before 1968`, an envelope over delivery YEARS computed without reading text. Its premise is that the fact is true by the time it is told; on that same premise the DAY of the telling is a strictly better upper bound. Nothing is re-decided — the bound is stated to the precision the evidence always supported. The delivery claim for 1968-10-04 on nid 1110 is held at `certain` by the corpus, which is what carries this claim. #2274; the L6a row stands beside this one.
c. 1946
estimated · probable
Why
M7 dating pass (529; 525's readers, packet 021)
Reasoning
Passage 530464 (heavenly chorus calling one's eternal name, lifted through the skull, world with no sun) matches his 1946 chorus experience, told in passage 542796 as 'the chorus call my name, Neville... Neville is risen'. The database dates the chorus to 1946 (events 7508, 17111, 18668).
before 31 May 1963
bound
Why
M7 dating pass (529; 525's readers, packet 021)
Reasoning
The telling lecture, nid 1110 'On the Book of Revelation', has a certain delivery of 1963-05-31 (passage text header). The 1968-10-04 date on this event's bound comes from a delivery claim now refuted, so 1963-05-31 is the true, tighter ceiling.
Told / reported
10 October 1969
stated · doubtful
31 May 1963
estimated
Why
Lane L7 (#2354) re-derivation. Supersedes in substance, not in storage, the refuted-date told claim(s) on this event; those rows stand per append-only.
Reasoning
Re-derived, not walked down. The existing told claim(s) on this event took their date from a delivery claim on node 1110 that the corpus has since REFUTED, so the corpus was asserting that Neville told this on a day it separately says he did not lecture. That is a contradiction rather than an over-confidence, and lowering the confidence would have hidden it instead of resolving it. The refutation stands and the told claim is the wrong side of it. Node 1110 surviving (non-refuted) claim: 1963-5-31 at `certain`. All claims on the node: 1963-5-31 certain; 1968-10-4 refuted; 1963-5-31 certain (preferred). Superseded here: delta 0: 1968-10-04 at `certain` (run `corpus v1 / phase3b`). The telling is dated by its lecture, so with the refuted date removed from consideration the surviving claim is what the telling inherits, at that claim own confidence and no higher.
4 October 1968
stated · refuted
Reasoning
|| v1.1/l7/told-close: the delivery claim this was derived from (nid 1110, 1968-10-4) was refuted by the L7 adjudication (#2363). The corrected told claim from the same lecture stands at 1963-5-31. This row is retired rather than deleted so the derivation history remains readable.