They have now been ten years in the present apartment, and remembering what fourteen years of accumulation took to clear, he hopes he goes first so his wife has the pleasure of weeding it out.
Date (happened)
between 1960 and 1970
unresolved
between 1960 and 1970
stated · preferred
between 1961 and 1971
relative
Why
Corrects the legacy range derived from the refuted 1970 telling; prior row remains append-only.
Reasoning
Lecture 1511's surviving preferred delivery is 1971-04-16; its 1970 carrier date is refuted. Counting the stated ten-year residence from the corrected telling yields a 1961–1971 year-range, without inventing exact month/day endpoints.
Told / reported
16 April 1971
conclusion
Why
dc1-agreement-20261004, pm-actor-551 (PM 8702)
Reasoning
1 claim, no conflict: 1971-04-16 (node:1511).
16 April 1971
estimated
Why
Lane L7 (#2354) re-derivation. Supersedes in substance, not in storage, the refuted-date told claim(s) on this event; those rows stand per append-only.
Reasoning
Re-derived, not walked down. The existing told claim(s) on this event took their date from a delivery claim on node 1511 that the corpus has since REFUTED, so the corpus was asserting that Neville told this on a day it separately says he did not lecture. That is a contradiction rather than an over-confidence, and lowering the confidence would have hidden it instead of resolving it. The refutation stands and the told claim is the wrong side of it. Node 1511 surviving (non-refuted) claim: 1971-4-16 at `certain`. All claims on the node: 1970-4-16 refuted; 1971-4-16 certain (preferred). Superseded here: delta 0: 1970-04-16 at `certain` (run `corpus v1 / phase3b`). The telling is dated by its lecture, so with the refuted date removed from consideration the surviving claim is what the telling inherits, at that claim own confidence and no higher.
16 April 1970
stated · refuted
Reasoning
|| v1.1/l7/told-close: the delivery claim this was derived from (nid 1511, 1970-4-16) was refuted by the L7 adjudication (#2363). The corrected told claim from the same lecture stands at 1971-4-16. This row is retired rather than deleted so the derivation history remains readable.
Sources
Source
- Order Then Wait ¶36 (That’s why, not to burden my wife, I hope I go first, that she will have the pleasure of weeding out what we have now, because I couldn’t face it, really . . the thought of all that you accumulate. We have been here now ten years in the present apartment.)
1 tellings, oldest first. A date in brackets shows how it is known; "circa", "after" and "possible" dates are rough.
| Date |
Lecture or book |
Telling |
Passage |
| 1971-04-16 [exact/certain/final] |
Order Then Wait |
You grow, and you outgrow, and you grow and you outgrow; and all these things that we kept and kept and kept for fourteen years, we accumulated them. Where we kept them, I really do not know: under the bed, under this, . . all places. And finally came the day of moving. That’s why, not to burden my wife, I hope I go first, that she will have the pleasure of weeding out what we have now, because I couldn’t face it, really . . the thought of all that you accumulate. We have been here now ten years in the present apartment. And knowing what happened after fourteen years, I despair when I think… |
541585 |