Woman recognizes Neville and Paul in a vision without seeing their forms

A woman friend recognised him in a vision without seeing his form, saying 'That is Neville' — and knew Paul with the same certainty though she had never met a man called Paul.
Date (happened)
before 1968
unresolved
  1. before 1968 bound · possible
    Source The Signs of the End ¶27qualifying source passages 542497; telling lecture nids 1553
    Reasoning Qualifying passage ids [542497] belong to telling lecture nids [1553]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1968 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1968 is the MIN across telling lectures.
  2. before 20 October 1967 bound
    Source The Signs of the End
    Why M7 dating pass (529; 525's readers, packet 040)
    Reasoning Same refutation basis as 17366.
Place
Los Angeles
Persons
Neville Goddard
Paul
Told
  1. 20 October 1967 estimated
    Source The Signs of the Endnid 1553 surviving delivery claim after refutation. All claims: 1967-10-20 certain; 1968-7-26 refuted; 1967-10-20 certain (preferred)
    Why Lane L7 (#2354) re-derivation. Supersedes in substance, not in storage, the refuted-date told claim(s) on this event; those rows stand per append-only.
    Reasoning Re-derived, not walked down. The existing told claim(s) on this event took their date from a delivery claim on node 1553 that the corpus has since REFUTED, so the corpus was asserting that Neville told this on a day it separately says he did not lecture. That is a contradiction rather than an over-confidence, and lowering the confidence would have hidden it instead of resolving it. The refutation stands and the told claim is the wrong side of it. Node 1553 surviving (non-refuted) claim: 1967-10-20 at `certain`. All claims on the node: 1967-10-20 certain; 1968-7-26 refuted; 1967-10-20 certain (preferred). Superseded here: delta 0: 1968-07-26 at `certain` (run `corpus v1 / phase3b`). The telling is dated by its lecture, so with the refuted date removed from consideration the surviving claim is what the telling inherits, at that claim own confidence and no higher.
  2. 26 July 1968 stated · refuted
    Source The Signs of the EndThe Signs of the End (nid 1553), telling 1553-5, told 1968-07-26
    Reasoning || v1.1/l7/told-close: the delivery claim this was derived from (nid 1553, 1968-7-26) was refuted by the L7 adjudication (#2363). The corrected told claim from the same lecture stands at 1967-10-20. This row is retired rather than deleted so the derivation history remains readable.
Sources

Source

  • The Signs of the End ¶27 (I’ll know you, just as my friend spotted me and knew me without any uncertainty, “That is Neville.” She didn’t see the form, and she never encountered a man called “Paul”, but she knew him with the same certainty that she knew me.)