Neville says he has seen the characters of the Bible in vision, not as persons but as eternal states of consciousness, which made Blake's Vision of the Last Judgment clear to him for the first time.
Date (happened)
before 1969
bound · possible
Reasoning
Qualifying passage ids [542612] belong to telling lecture nids [1710]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1969 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1969 is the MIN across telling lectures.
before 5 February 1963
bound · probable
Why
Tightens the L6a envelope bound, which had used the doubtful 1969-08-08 claim as its non-refuted MAX year.
Reasoning
The vision is described as something Neville has already had by the time he recounts it; the best-evidenced telling date is 1963-02-05, not the 1969 the L6a envelope used, so the happening-date upper bound tightens correspondingly. || v1.1 type repair: written as `estimated` by run v1.1/l4/c0y, retyped `bound` — a `before` claim is an outer limit, which the lane brief and 97% of the corpus type as `bound`.
Told / reported
5 February 1963
estimated
Why
Lane L7 (#2354) re-derivation. Supersedes in substance, not in storage, the refuted-date told claim(s) on this event; those rows stand per append-only.
Reasoning
Re-derived, not walked down. The existing told claim(s) on this event took their date from a delivery claim on node 1710 that the corpus has since REFUTED, so the corpus was asserting that Neville told this on a day it separately says he did not lecture. That is a contradiction rather than an over-confidence, and lowering the confidence would have hidden it instead of resolving it. The refutation stands and the told claim is the wrong side of it. Node 1710 surviving (non-refuted) claim: 1963-2-5 at `certain`. All claims on the node: 1952-7-7 refuted; 1963-2-5 certain; 1969-8-8 refuted; 1963-2-5 certain (preferred). Superseded here: delta 0: 1969-08-08 at `certain` (run `corpus v1 / phase3b`). The telling is dated by its lecture, so with the refuted date removed from consideration the surviving claim is what the telling inherits, at that claim own confidence and no higher.
8 August 1969
stated · refuted
Reasoning
|| v1.1/l7/told-close: the delivery claim this was derived from (nid 1710, 1969-8-8) was refuted by the L7 adjudication (#2363). The corrected told claim from the same lecture stands at 1963-2-5. This row is retired rather than deleted so the derivation history remains readable.