Returned to United States after London literary awakening at twenty

Autobiographical memory recalled by Neville in his lectures. Year derived: age 20 + birth 1905 = 1925. Told 2 times (?). Judged his own (not a retold third-party story) by the whose_age adjudication.
Date (happened)
1925
unresolved
  1. 1925 stated · preferred
    Source Word 2 ¶3"at the age of twenty", told in Word 2 (nid 1759)
  2. c. 1925 stated · probable
    Source age 20 + birth 1905 = 1925 (2 statements, told ?)
Place
United States possible
from London
to United States
Persons
Neville Goddard
Told / reported
  1. 6 December 1966 estimated
    Source Word 2nid 1759 surviving delivery claim after refutation. All claims: 1965-2-2 refuted; 1966-11-30 refuted; 1966-12-1 refuted; 1966-12-6 certain (preferred)
    Why Lane L7 (#2354) re-derivation. Supersedes in substance, not in storage, the refuted-date told claim(s) on this event; those rows stand per append-only.
    Reasoning Re-derived, not walked down. The existing told claim(s) on this event took their date from a delivery claim on node 1759 that the corpus has since REFUTED, so the corpus was asserting that Neville told this on a day it separately says he did not lecture. That is a contradiction rather than an over-confidence, and lowering the confidence would have hidden it instead of resolving it. The refutation stands and the told claim is the wrong side of it. Node 1759 surviving (non-refuted) claim: 1966-12-6 at `certain`. All claims on the node: 1965-2-2 refuted; 1966-11-30 refuted; 1966-12-1 refuted; 1966-12-6 certain (preferred). Superseded here: delta 0: 1965-02-02 at `certain` (run `corpus v1 / phase3b`). The telling is dated by its lecture, so with the refuted date removed from consideration the surviving claim is what the telling inherits, at that claim own confidence and no higher.
  2. 2 February 1965 stated · refuted
    Source Word 2Word 2 (nid 1759), telling 1759-1, told 1965-02-02
    Reasoning || v1.1/l7/told-close: the delivery claim this was derived from (nid 1759, 1965-2-2) was refuted by the L7 adjudication (#2363). The corrected told claim from the same lecture stands at 1966-12-6. This row is retired rather than deleted so the derivation history remains readable.
Sources

Source

  • Tloa Lecturethe Sower ¶40 ("at the age of twenty")
  • Word 2 ¶3 (I became fired with reading at the age of twenty. Prior to that, nothing interested me but sports—cricket, soccer, football, everything athletic—but not anything of the mind. I was in London when a Mr. [Bacon?]*, a Scotsman, interested me in literature.)