Neville first heard the mystery of Christianity from a black man who was not born a Christian; the blow demolished everything he had believed and he had to rebuild his world from ashes and then prove the true Jesus by testing him.
Date (happened)
before 17 April 1967
unresolved
before 1966
bound · possible
Reasoning
Qualifying passage ids [542846] belong to telling lecture nids [1750]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1966 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1966 is the MIN across telling lectures.
before 1967
bound · possible
Why
Corrects the phase4 L6a envelope on this event from before 1966 to before 1967.
Reasoning
Envelope recompute, arithmetic only. The phase4 L6a row on this event states its own rule: each telling lecture contributes MAX of its non-refuted delivery years, and the envelope is the MIN across telling lectures. Recomputed live over lecture nid(s) 1750 that row cites, MAX(non-refuted field_delivery_year) gives 1967, not the 1966 the row carries — the bound was below its own stated rule and therefore UNSAFE: it asserted the event did not happen in 1 year(s) where it may sit. Same premise, same evidence, no re-reading and no re-judgement; only the maximum was taken correctly. The L6a row stands beside this one (append-only). Ruling: #2235 delta 1, architect 378.
before 17 April 1967
estimated · probable
Why
M7 dating pass (529; 525's readers, packet 039): its source node 1750 does not exist on www: left off; bound with no source: written as estimated with the reader's reasoning
Reasoning
Node 1750's only surviving delivery claim is 1967-04-17 (probable); the 1966-12-27 stated date is refuted.
Told / reported
17 April 1967
estimated · probable
Why
Lane L7 (#2354) re-derivation. Supersedes in substance, not in storage, the refuted-date told claim(s) on this event; those rows stand per append-only.
Reasoning
Re-derived, not walked down. The existing told claim(s) on this event took their date from a delivery claim on node 1750 that the corpus has since REFUTED, so the corpus was asserting that Neville told this on a day it separately says he did not lecture. That is a contradiction rather than an over-confidence, and lowering the confidence would have hidden it instead of resolving it. The refutation stands and the told claim is the wrong side of it. Node 1750 surviving (non-refuted) claim: 1967-4-17 at `probable`. All claims on the node: 1966-12-27 refuted; 1967-4-17 probable (preferred). Superseded here: delta 0: 1966-12-27 at `certain` (run `corpus v1 / phase3b`) | delta 1: 1966-12-27 at `probable` (run `v1.1/l4/ceiling/c2`). The telling is dated by its lecture, so with the refuted date removed from consideration the surviving claim is what the telling inherits, at that claim own confidence and no higher.
27 December 1966
stated · refuted
Reasoning
|| v1.1/l7/told-close: the delivery claim this was derived from (nid 1750, 1966-12-27) was refuted by the L7 adjudication (#2363). The corrected told claim from the same lecture stands at 1967-4-17. This row is retired rather than deleted so the derivation history remains readable.
27 December 1966
stated · refuted
Why
Corrects the confidence of the told claim written by run `corpus v1 / phase3b` at delta 0 on this event; that claim is left standing per append-only. Ceiling rule #2132.
Reasoning
Confidence only; the date is not re-adjudicated and is left exactly as written. This claim is derived from the delivery claims of node 1750 and asserts `certain`, but the strongest claim that node carries is `probable`, so there is nothing for `certain` to inherit from. nid 1750 delivery claims: 1966-12-27 refuted; 1967-4-17 probable. Walked back to `probable`, the ceiling. Whether the DATE is right is a separate question this row does not touch; if the evidence turns out to support more confidence, it will have to come from a source other than this node. || v1.1/l7/told-close: the delivery claim this was derived from (nid 1750, 1966-12-27) was refuted by the L7 adjudication (#2363). The corrected told claim from the same lecture stands at 1967-4-17. This row is retired rather than deleted so the derivation history remains readable.
Sources
Source
- Jesus Or Barabbas ¶14 (And when I heard it, I heard it from the lips of one who was not born a Christian. I heard it from the lips of one who was not in the Caucasian race. He was a Negro. Here I actually heard the mystery, Christianity. But what a blow to me!)