Neville discusses awakening after death with his brother

Neville says he cannot persuade his brother — who is two years his senior and still believes Christ is on the outside — to take any interest in what lies beyond; when Neville was home last year his brother told him he would simply find himself in another world as he found himself in this one, and Neville answered that he would wake in a year best suited to the work still to be done.
Date (happened)
1964
unresolved
  1. 1964 stated · preferred
    Source Word 2 ¶16"when I was home last year", told in Word 2 (nid 1759)
  2. c. 1965 estimated
    Reasoning Passage 543372 says the conversation occurred 'when I was home last year'. The carrier lecture's authoritative adjudication establishes 1966-12-06 at certain and refutes the 1965-02-02 anchor used by the standing 1964 claim. Subtracting one calendar year from the supported speaking year gives 1965; month and day are omitted because 'last year' supplies only year precision. The phrase names a specific one-year offset without hedging, and the anchor is certain, so the year-level estimate carries certain confidence while remaining circa rather than an exact day.
Place
Told / reported
  1. 6 December 1966 estimated
    Source Word 2nid 1759 surviving delivery claim after refutation. All claims: 1965-2-2 refuted; 1966-11-30 refuted; 1966-12-1 refuted; 1966-12-6 certain (preferred)
    Why Lane L7 (#2354) re-derivation. Supersedes in substance, not in storage, the refuted-date told claim(s) on this event; those rows stand per append-only.
    Reasoning Re-derived, not walked down. The existing told claim(s) on this event took their date from a delivery claim on node 1759 that the corpus has since REFUTED, so the corpus was asserting that Neville told this on a day it separately says he did not lecture. That is a contradiction rather than an over-confidence, and lowering the confidence would have hidden it instead of resolving it. The refutation stands and the told claim is the wrong side of it. Node 1759 surviving (non-refuted) claim: 1966-12-6 at `certain`. All claims on the node: 1965-2-2 refuted; 1966-11-30 refuted; 1966-12-1 refuted; 1966-12-6 certain (preferred). Superseded here: delta 0: 1965-02-02 at `certain` (run `corpus v1 / phase3b`). The telling is dated by its lecture, so with the refuted date removed from consideration the surviving claim is what the telling inherits, at that claim own confidence and no higher.
  2. 2 February 1965 stated · refuted
    Source Word 2Word 2 (nid 1759), telling 1759-6, told 1965-02-02
    Reasoning || v1.1/l7/told-close: the delivery claim this was derived from (nid 1759, 1965-2-2) was refuted by the L7 adjudication (#2363). The corrected told claim from the same lecture stands at 1966-12-6. This row is retired rather than deleted so the derivation history remains readable.
Sources

Source

  • Word 2 ¶16 (And he said to me when I was home last year, “I’m not interested in anything beyond. When I make my exit from this world, I will find myself in the world wherever I go, if I survive, as I did here.)