At an earlier meeting his friend Jack asked a question about the one birth through the womb, and Neville's answer, quoting the ninth chapter of Hebrews, confused several of those present; he says here that he regrets it and hopes tonight makes it clearer.
Date (happened)
c. July 1968
stated · probable · preferred
Source
"the other night", told in The Man Within (nid 1796)
c. January 1968
estimated · probable
Source
delivery claim d1 on lecture nid 1796, 1968-01-12, probable, preferred
Why
Existing d0 (circa 1968-07, probable) rests on the node's doubtful legacy date; not altered, only superseded here.
Reasoning
The witness (passage 544683) places the confusing answer to Jack 'the other night', shortly before the telling. The lecture's currently strongest delivery claim is 1968-01-12 (probable, chrome dateline), not the doubtful legacy 1968-07-24 that this event's existing field_date claim was built from; correcting the month follows the correction already recorded on the node itself.
Told / reported
24 July 1968
stated · doubtful
Source
The Man Within (nid 1796), telling 1796-6, told 1968-07-24
24 July 1968
stated · doubtful
Source
The Man Within (nid 1796), telling 1796-6, told 1968-07-24
Why
Corrects the confidence of the told claim written by run `corpus v1 / phase3b` at delta 0 on this event; that claim is left standing per append-only. Ceiling rule #2132.
Reasoning
Confidence only; the date is not re-adjudicated and is left exactly as written. This claim is derived from the delivery claims of node 1796 and asserts `certain`, but the strongest claim that node carries is `probable`, so there is nothing for `certain` to inherit from. nid 1796 delivery claims: 1968-7-24 doubtful; 1968-1-12 probable. Walked back to `probable`, the ceiling. Whether the DATE is right is a separate question this row does not touch; if the evidence turns out to support more confidence, it will have to come from a source other than this node.
12 January 1968
estimated · probable
Source
delivery claim d1 on lecture nid 1796 ('The Man Within'), probable, preferred
Why
Existing told claims (both 1968-07-24) rest on the node's doubtful legacy date; not altered, only superseded here.
Reasoning
The sole witness (passage 544683) sits inside lecture nid 1796. That node's own strongest current delivery claim is 1968-01-12 (probable, chrome dateline), while the 1968-07-24 date this event's existing told claims rest on is flagged doubtful/likely-erroneous on the node itself (title mismatch, dateline mismatch, weekday mismatch). The told claim inherits from the delivery claim it is actually keyed to and cannot exceed its probable ceiling.