Going home to his father in 1933, eleven years after leaving in '22, he sat on the veranda when a minister — an old schoolboy friend — called; discussing the Bible, his father turned to him and said 'You know, son, you are an apostle', a judgement Neville could not then accept.
Date (happened)
-
before 1965
bound · possible
Reasoning
Qualifying passage ids [532803] belong to telling lecture nids [1196]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1965 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1965 is the MIN across telling lectures.
before 1969
bound · possible
Why
Corrects the phase4 L6a envelope on this event from before 1965 to before 1969.
Reasoning
Envelope recompute, arithmetic only. The phase4 L6a row on this event states its own rule: each telling lecture contributes MAX of its non-refuted delivery years, and the envelope is the MIN across telling lectures. Recomputed live over lecture nid(s) 1196 that row cites, MAX(non-refuted field_delivery_year) gives 1969, not the 1965 the row carries — the bound was below its own stated rule and therefore UNSAFE: it asserted the event did not happen in 4 year(s) where it may sit. Same premise, same evidence, no re-reading and no re-judgement; only the maximum was taken correctly. The L6a row stands beside this one (append-only). Ruling: #2235 delta 1, architect 378.
before 28 February 1969
bound
Reasoning
The visit and father reply are completed past events. Authoritative adjudication fixes node 1196 telling at 1969-02-28 certain and rejects 1965-03-05.
c. 1933
estimated · probable
Why
M7 dating pass (529; 525's readers, packet 023)
Reasoning
Chronology event 18070, 'Neville's father calls him an apostle in 1933', Barbados, has the same remark (passage 532803); Neville was in Barbados December 1933 to early 1934 (event 20583).
Told / reported
-
28 February 1969
estimated · probable
Why
Lane L7 (#2354) re-derivation. Supersedes in substance, not in storage, the refuted-date told claim(s) on this event; those rows stand per append-only.
Reasoning
Re-derived, not walked down. The existing told claim(s) on this event took their date from a delivery claim on node 1196 that the corpus has since REFUTED, so the corpus was asserting that Neville told this on a day it separately says he did not lecture. That is a contradiction rather than an over-confidence, and lowering the confidence would have hidden it instead of resolving it. The refutation stands and the told claim is the wrong side of it. Node 1196 surviving (non-refuted) claim: 1969-2-28 at `probable`. All claims on the node: 1965-3-5 refuted; 1969-2-28 probable (preferred). Superseded here: delta 0: 1965-03-05 at `certain` (run `corpus v1 / phase3b`) | delta 1: 1965-03-05 at `probable` (run `v1.1/l4/ceiling/c2`). The telling is dated by its lecture, so with the refuted date removed from consideration the surviving claim is what the telling inherits, at that claim own confidence and no higher.
5 March 1965
stated · refuted
Reasoning
|| v1.1/l7/told-close: the delivery claim this was derived from (nid 1196, 1965-3-5) was refuted by the L7 adjudication (#2363). The corrected told claim from the same lecture stands at 1969-2-28. This row is retired rather than deleted so the derivation history remains readable.
Sources
Source
- A Confession of Faith ¶84 (My father turned to me in the presence of the minister—I had never discussed it with my father before—and he looked at me, he said, “You know, son, you are an apostle.”)
- Believe in Him ¶27 (One day a minister was at the house, and when he could not answer my questions, or throw any light upon my visions, my father said: “Son, you must be an apostle.”)