Speaking of the linen clothes in the tomb, Neville says his own mother wove his fleshly garment in her womb.
Date (happened)
before 1969
bound · possible
Reasoning
Qualifying passage ids [547332] belong to telling lecture nids [1867]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1969 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1969 is the MIN across telling lectures.
before 7 April 1969
bound
Why
Tightens the phase4 L6a envelope from before 1969 to before 1969-04-07.
Reasoning
L6a envelope tightened to the telling day of nid 1867 (certain delivery 1969-04-07); same premise, finer precision. The phase4 L6a bound on this event is `before 1969`, an envelope over delivery YEARS computed without reading text. Its premise is that the fact is true by the time it is told; on that same premise the DAY of the telling is a strictly better upper bound. Nothing is re-decided — the bound is stated to the precision the evidence always supported. The delivery claim for 1969-04-07 on nid 1867 is held at `certain` by the corpus, which is what carries this claim. #2274; the L6a row stands beside this one.
before 1969
bound · possible
Source
qualifying source passages 539764; telling lecture nids 1441
Reasoning
Qualifying passage ids [539764] belong to telling lecture nids [1441]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1969 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1969 is the MIN across telling lectures.
Told / reported
-
7 April 1969
estimated
Why
Correctly types the inherited telling date; the older stated row stands.
Reasoning
Passage 547332 occurs in lecture nid 1867, whose delivery is fixed to 1969-04-07 by two catalog claims, transcript chrome, and its Easter-Monday internal anchor; the telling date is inherited and therefore typed estimated.
7 April 1969
estimated
Source
nid 1441 surviving delivery claim after refutation. All claims: 1969-4-19 refuted; 1969-4-19 refuted; 1969-4-7 certain (preferred)
Why
Lane L7 (#2354) re-derivation. Supersedes in substance, not in storage, the refuted-date told claim(s) on this event; those rows stand per append-only.
Reasoning
Re-derived, not walked down. The existing told claim(s) on this event took their date from a delivery claim on node 1441 that the corpus has since REFUTED, so the corpus was asserting that Neville told this on a day it separately says he did not lecture. That is a contradiction rather than an over-confidence, and lowering the confidence would have hidden it instead of resolving it. The refutation stands and the told claim is the wrong side of it. Node 1441 surviving (non-refuted) claim: 1969-4-7 at `certain`. All claims on the node: 1969-4-19 refuted; 1969-4-19 refuted; 1969-4-7 certain (preferred). Superseded here: delta 0: 1969-04-19 at `certain` (run `corpus v1 / phase3b`). The telling is dated by its lecture, so with the refuted date removed from consideration the surviving claim is what the telling inherits, at that claim own confidence and no higher.
19 April 1969
stated · refuted
Source
All That You Behold (nid 1441), telling 1441-0, told 1969-04-19
Reasoning
|| v1.1/l7/told-close: the delivery claim this was derived from (nid 1441, 1969-4-19) was refuted by the L7 adjudication (#2363). The corrected told claim from the same lecture stands at 1969-4-7. This row is retired rather than deleted so the derivation history remains readable.