Neville says he knows from his own night experience that while playing one part here he is simultaneously elsewhere playing other parts, and that people see him at night in different parts — he is a scattered being.
Date (happened)
before 24 January 1969
bound · probable · preferred
Why
M7 dating pass (529; 525's readers, packet 043)
Reasoning
Lecture 1910 is dated 1969-01-24 at probable confidence; the simultaneous-roles remark precedes the telling.
before 1963
bound · possible
Reasoning
Qualifying passage ids [548638] belong to telling lecture nids [1910]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1963 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1963 is the MIN across telling lectures.
before 1969
bound · possible
Why
Corrects the phase4 L6a envelope on this event from before 1963 to before 1969.
Reasoning
Envelope recompute, arithmetic only. The phase4 L6a row on this event states its own rule: each telling lecture contributes MAX of its non-refuted delivery years, and the envelope is the MIN across telling lectures. Recomputed live over lecture nid(s) 1910 that row cites, MAX(non-refuted field_delivery_year) gives 1969, not the 1963 the row carries — the bound was below its own stated rule and therefore UNSAFE: it asserted the event did not happen in 6 year(s) where it may sit. Same premise, same evidence, no re-reading and no re-judgement; only the maximum was taken correctly. The L6a row stands beside this one (append-only). Ruling: #2235 delta 1, architect 378.
Told / reported
24 January 1969
estimated · probable
Why
d0 (1963-64, preferred=1) and d1 (1969-01-24) genuinely conflict on this lecture; not silently picking the prettier one — following the node's own documented preference for the dateline over the discredited contemporary-scandal inference.
Reasoning
Passage 548638 is Neville describing on the platform his own experience of playing simultaneous parts at night; the lecture carrying this telling (nid 1910) carries two conflicting delivery claims, and its own recorded d1 reasoning explains in detail why the dateline (1969-01-24) is the stronger, transcript-sourced reading and the 1963-64 inference is weaker than presented, so this telling follows the dateline rather than the discredited inference, at the same probable confidence as that dateline claim (not upgraded to certain).
Sources
Source
- Mystery Election ¶59 (But here, I know when people see me in different parts at night, playing different parts, I am a scattered being.)