Freudian friend remains in the Army despite Neville's advice

After his own discharge Neville wrote to a Freudian friend of the same age who was equally eligible, telling him what he had done; the friend never answered and stayed in the army until the war ended, having once told Neville he pressed his feet into the carpet at Neville's New York meetings to keep hold of reality.
Date (happened)
c. March 1943
probable
  1. c. March 1943 conclusion · probable
    Why dc1-agreement-20261004, pm-actor-551 (PM 8702)
    Reasoning 1 claim, no conflict: c. 1943-03 (passage:528488).
  2. c. March 1943 estimated · probable · preferred
    Source The Flood Is Still Upon Us ¶1corpus Army-discharge anchor, passage 528488 ('When in March of 1943... in nine days I was out, honorably discharged')
    Why The friend's own fate (stayed in the army until the war ended) is a bound of 'after 1943' with no further precision, not repeated here as a separate claim.
    Reasoning Neville frames the letter as written right after his own discharge ('when it happened to me... I wrote a friend'); the corpus anchor dates his discharge to March 1943 from his own platform account, so the letter falls circa that same month. The Army anchor's own ceiling is probable, so this derived claim cannot exceed it.
Persons
Told
  1. 19 February 1965 conclusion · probable
    Why dc1-agreement-20261004, pm-actor-551 (PM 8702)
    Reasoning 1 claim, no conflict: 1965-02-19 (node:1913).
  2. 19 February 1965 estimated · probable
    Source The Secret of the Spermdelivery claim d0 on lecture nid 1913, 'The Secret of the Sperm'
    Reasoning The anecdote about the friend is recounted as a past occurrence during this lecture; the telling is dated by the lecture's probable delivery claim of 1965-02-19 (his own February 19th birthday vision, dated by a December 1964 congress reference).
Sources

Source

  • The Secret of the Sperm ¶24 (So when it happened to me in nine days I wrote a friend of mine who was my age, who was just as eligible, and I wrote him and I told him what I had done. He never answered my letter. He’s a Freudian.)