Neville tells how his friend and publisher Grace, unwell two years earlier, dozed while watching a travelogue on TV and on waking said aloud that she must remember what Neville said — 'I am with you always to the end of the age' — which he identifies as the words of the risen Christ.
Told
15 November 1966
estimated · probable
Why
Lane L7 (#2354) re-derivation. Supersedes in substance, not in storage, the refuted-date told claim(s) on this event; those rows stand per append-only.
Reasoning
Re-derived, not walked down. The existing told claim(s) on this event took their date from a delivery claim on node 1957 that the corpus has since REFUTED, so the corpus was asserting that Neville told this on a day it separately says he did not lecture. That is a contradiction rather than an over-confidence, and lowering the confidence would have hidden it instead of resolving it. The refutation stands and the told claim is the wrong side of it. Node 1957 surviving (non-refuted) claim: 1966-11-15 at `probable`. All claims on the node: 1967-7-?? refuted; 1966-11-15 probable (preferred). Superseded here: delta 0: 1967-07-00 at `possible` (run `v1.1/l4/w1/D4`). The telling is dated by its lecture, so with the refuted date removed from consideration the surviving claim is what the telling inherits, at that claim own confidence and no higher.
after July 1967
estimated · refuted
Why
This is the lecture's only delivery evidence and it is explicitly marked 'weak' by the prior pass; kept as a possible/after claim rather than upgraded.
Reasoning
Passage 550092 is Neville himself telling, in first person, the story of his friend and publisher Grace dozing during a travelogue and waking with the words of the risen Christ; this is the telling. The lecture containing it, nid 1957, carries no exact delivery date -- only a weak bound (after July 1967, possible) derived from a correspondent's letter chronology. The telling can be pinned no tighter than that bound and inherits its qualifier and confidence exactly, not improved upon. || v1.1/l7/told-lower: lowered `possible` -> `doubtful`. The telling-date 1967-07-?? is refuted on the source lecture (nid 1957) and no live claim on that node supports it, so the corpus can no longer say WHEN this was told. ⛔ The row is KEPT, not retired: it also records THAT nid 1957 tells this event, which is true and checkable from the passages, and retiring it would discard that with the date.
Sources
Source
- The Return of Jesus ¶18 (My friend and publisher, Grace, two years ago she wasn’t feeling well—this is after he had returned in me, it couldn’t have happened before, for these are the words of the risen Christ—she sat at home looking at a travelogue on TV and dozed for a few mom…)