Neville was present the morning a woman he loved received the revelation "Stop spending your thoughts, your time and your money"; he put it into the chapter "The Coin of Heaven" in Awakened Imagination, and she afterwards confessed to him she never practised it herself.
Date (happened)
c. 12 April 1953
unresolved
before 1955
bound · possible
Reasoning
Qualifying passage ids [550263] belong to telling lecture nids [1964]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1955 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1955 is the MIN across telling lectures.
before 1971
bound · possible
Why
Corrects the phase4 L6a envelope on this event from before 1955 to before 1971.
Reasoning
Envelope recompute, arithmetic only. The phase4 L6a row on this event states its own rule: each telling lecture contributes MAX of its non-refuted delivery years, and the envelope is the MIN across telling lectures. Recomputed live over lecture nid(s) 1964 that row cites, MAX(non-refuted field_delivery_year) gives 1971, not the 1955 the row carries — the bound was below its own stated rule and therefore UNSAFE: it asserted the event did not happen in 16 year(s) where it may sit. Same premise, same evidence, no re-reading and no re-judgement; only the maximum was taken correctly. The L6a row stands beside this one (append-only). Ruling: #2235 delta 1, architect 378.
before 1954
bound
Reasoning
The full passage states that Neville incorporated the woman's revelation into the chapter 'The Coin of Heaven' in Awakened Imagination. The corpus's accepted publication event hist_event:974 holds the book's publication in 1954 with three agreeing sources. Therefore the revelation occurred before that publication; the year-level bound is certain, while no unsupported month or day is invented. || v1.1 type repair: written as `estimated` by run v1.1/l4/actor402/18500-18999-b2, retyped `bound` — a `before` claim is an outer limit, which the lane brief and 97% of the corpus type as `bound`.
c. 12 April 1953
estimated · possible
Why
M7 dating pass (529; 525's readers, packet 001)
Reasoning
Passage 550263: 'I was there the morning it happened' and he put it in 'The Coin of Heaven'; event 18859 (Neville's wife hears the command to make sound investments) is dated 1953-04-12. The identification is an inference (and the corpus dates Awakened Imagination both 1954 and c.1948).
Told
26 April 1971
conclusion · probable
Why
dc1-agreement-20261004, pm-actor-551 (PM 8702)
Reasoning
1 claim, no conflict: 1971-04-26 (node:1964).
26 April 1971
estimated · probable
Why
Lane L7 (#2354) re-derivation. Supersedes in substance, not in storage, the refuted-date told claim(s) on this event; those rows stand per append-only.
Reasoning
Re-derived, not walked down. The existing told claim(s) on this event took their date from a delivery claim on node 1964 that the corpus has since REFUTED, so the corpus was asserting that Neville told this on a day it separately says he did not lecture. That is a contradiction rather than an over-confidence, and lowering the confidence would have hidden it instead of resolving it. The refutation stands and the told claim is the wrong side of it. Node 1964 surviving (non-refuted) claim: 1971-4-26 at `probable`. All claims on the node: 1955-5-14 refuted; 1971-4-26 probable (preferred). Superseded here: delta 0: 1955-05-14 at `certain` (run `corpus v1 / phase3b`) | delta 1: 1955-05-14 at `probable` (run `v1.1/l4/ceiling/c2`). The telling is dated by its lecture, so with the refuted date removed from consideration the surviving claim is what the telling inherits, at that claim own confidence and no higher.
14 May 1955
stated · refuted
Reasoning
|| v1.1/l7/told-close: the delivery claim this was derived from (nid 1964, 1955-5-14) was refuted by the L7 adjudication (#2363). The corrected told claim from the same lecture stands at 1971-4-26. This row is retired rather than deleted so the derivation history remains readable.
14 May 1955
stated · refuted
Why
Corrects the confidence of the told claim written by run `corpus v1 / phase3b` at delta 0 on this event; that claim is left standing per append-only. Ceiling rule #2132.
Reasoning
Confidence only; the date is not re-adjudicated and is left exactly as written. This claim is derived from the delivery claims of node 1964 and asserts `certain`, but the strongest claim that node carries is `probable`, so there is nothing for `certain` to inherit from. nid 1964 delivery claims: 1955-5-14 doubtful; 1971-4-26 probable. Walked back to `probable`, the ceiling. Whether the DATE is right is a separate question this row does not touch; if the evidence turns out to support more confidence, it will have to come from a source other than this node. || v1.1/l7/told-close: the delivery claim this was derived from (nid 1964, 1955-5-14) was refuted by the L7 adjudication (#2363). The corrected told claim from the same lecture stands at 1971-4-26. This row is retired rather than deleted so the derivation history remains readable.
Sources
Source
- Control Your Inner Conversations ¶16 (I was there the morning that it happened. “Stop spending your thoughts, your time and your money. Everything in life must be an investment.” And I so loved it, I incorporated that thought in the chapter, “The Coin of Heaven,” in my book, “Awakened Imagin…)