Neville's father lost everything he owned; one person believed in him and from that black day he built the great dream, and by his death last October he had given his community more than anyone before him.
Date (happened)
October 1959
stated · preferred
Told
1 December 1959
estimated
Why
Lane L7 (#2354) re-derivation. Supersedes in substance, not in storage, the refuted-date told claim(s) on this event; those rows stand per append-only.
Reasoning
Re-derived, not walked down. The existing told claim(s) on this event took their date from a delivery claim on node 2076 that the corpus has since REFUTED, so the corpus was asserting that Neville told this on a day it separately says he did not lecture. That is a contradiction rather than an over-confidence, and lowering the confidence would have hidden it instead of resolving it. The refutation stands and the told claim is the wrong side of it. Node 2076 surviving (non-refuted) claim: 1959-12-1 at `certain`. All claims on the node: 1959-12-1 certain; 1968-11-4 refuted; 1959-12-1 certain (preferred). Superseded here: delta 0: 1968-11-04 at `certain` (run `corpus v1 / phase3b`). The telling is dated by its lecture, so with the refuted date removed from consideration the surviving claim is what the telling inherits, at that claim own confidence and no higher.
4 November 1968
stated · refuted
Reasoning
|| v1.1/l7/told-close: the delivery claim this was derived from (nid 2076, 1968-11-4) was refuted by the L7 adjudication (#2363). The corrected told claim from the same lecture stands at 1959-12-1. This row is retired rather than deleted so the derivation history remains readable.
Sources
Source
- The Foundation Stone Imagination ¶20 (My father lost everything he owned, and that proved to be the beginning of the great dream he brought to pass. One person believed in him and he started on that, and when he made his exit last October, he had given to his community much that no one had e…)