Returning from Barbados last month Neville found a letter from this man reporting his biggest business months ever, and three mystical experiences he valued above all the money in the world: moving bodiless through infinite space repeating 'God'; going in meditation through the doors of a club and an adjacent hospital to fuse with the infinite soul of God saying 'I and the father are one'; and seeing a flame consuming nothing, approached by Moses, Abraham and Paul, who merged into one being named Jesus, out of whose body he saw himself come.
Date (happened)
between 1969 and 1970
unresolved
between 1969 and 1970
stated · probable · preferred
between January 1964 and September 1964
relative · probable
Reasoning
The three experiences predate the letter, while the letter itself reports July and August 1964 activity and is read in the September 1964 carrier. January through September 1964 is a conservative envelope that corrects the refuted 1970 anchor without inventing a narrower month.
Told
September 1964
estimated · probable
Why
Lane L7 (#2354) re-derivation. Supersedes in substance, not in storage, the refuted-date told claim(s) on this event; those rows stand per append-only.
Reasoning
Re-derived, not walked down. The existing told claim(s) on this event took their date from a delivery claim on node 2167 that the corpus has since REFUTED, so the corpus was asserting that Neville told this on a day it separately says he did not lecture. That is a contradiction rather than an over-confidence, and lowering the confidence would have hidden it instead of resolving it. The refutation stands and the told claim is the wrong side of it. Node 2167 surviving (non-refuted) claim: 1964-9-?? at `probable`. All claims on the node: 1970-??-?? refuted; 1964-9-?? probable (preferred). Superseded here: delta 0: 1970-00-00 at `probable` (run `corpus v1 / phase3b`). The telling is dated by its lecture, so with the refuted date removed from consideration the surviving claim is what the telling inherits, at that claim own confidence and no higher.
1970
stated · refuted
Reasoning
|| v1.1/l7/told-close: the delivery claim this was derived from (nid 2167, 1970--) was refuted by the L7 adjudication (#2363). The corrected told claim from the same lecture stands at 1964-9-?. This row is retired rather than deleted so the derivation history remains readable.