A woman asks Neville who saw the risen Christ

After the previous night's meeting a lady asked Neville to say more about who saw the risen Christ, and he takes it up for her sake.
Date (happened)
between 1955 and 1956
probable
  1. between 1955 and 1956 conclusion · probable
    Why dc1-agreement-20261004, pm-actor-551 (PM 8702)
    Reasoning 1 claim, no conflict: 1955–1956 (passage:554987).
  2. between 1955 and 1956 stated · probable · preferred
    Source The Pattern Man ¶70"Last night after the meeting", told in The Pattern Man (nid 2183)
Place
Los Angeles possible
Persons
Neville Goddard
Told / reported
  1. 1972 stated · refuted
    Source The Pattern ManThe Pattern Man (nid 2183), telling 2183-4, told 1972
    Reasoning || v1.1/l7/told-close: the delivery claim this was derived from (nid 2183, 1972--) was refuted by the L7 adjudication (#2363). The corrected told claim from the same lecture stands at 1968-7-17. This row is retired rather than deleted so the derivation history remains readable.
  2. 17 July 1968 estimated · refuted
    Source The Pattern Mannid 2183 surviving delivery claim after refutation. All claims: 1956-??-?? refuted; 1958-10-6 refuted; 1964-3-9 refuted; 1968-7-17 certain; 1969-5-12 refuted; 1969-10-15 refuted; 1971-3-15 refuted; 1972-??-?? refuted; 1968-7-17 certain (preferred)
    Why Lane L7 (#2354) re-derivation. Supersedes in substance, not in storage, the refuted-date told claim(s) on this event; those rows stand per append-only.
    Reasoning Re-derived, not walked down. The existing told claim(s) on this event took their date from a delivery claim on node 2183 that the corpus has since REFUTED, so the corpus was asserting that Neville told this on a day it separately says he did not lecture. That is a contradiction rather than an over-confidence, and lowering the confidence would have hidden it instead of resolving it. The refutation stands and the told claim is the wrong side of it. Node 2183 surviving (non-refuted) claim: 1968-7-17 at `certain`. All claims on the node: 1956-??-?? refuted; 1958-10-6 refuted; 1964-3-9 refuted; 1968-7-17 certain; 1969-5-12 refuted; 1969-10-15 refuted; 1971-3-15 refuted; 1972-??-?? refuted; 1968-7-17 certain (preferred). Superseded here: delta 0: 1972-00-00 at `certain` (run `corpus v1 / phase3b`). The telling is dated by its lecture, so with the refuted date removed from consideration the surviving claim is what the telling inherits, at that claim own confidence and no higher.
Sources

Source

  • The Pattern Man ¶70 (Last night after the meeting a lady asked me if I would touch on what I said earlier about who saw Him.)