Neville Goddard was born on Sunday, February 19, 1905, at 9:15 at night, on the island of Barbados -- the fourth of nine boys (and one girl) born to the Goddard family. He recounts the exact hour as his mother told it to him; in a tribute written by his student Margaret Ruth Broome, a relative climbing the stairs of the family's wooden-frame house on the day of the birth is said to have heard a voice announce 'His name is Neville' before the boy had been named. Across dozens of lectures he refers to 1905 as his birth year in passing, always consistently.
Date (happened)
19 February 1905
unresolved
19 February 1905
stated · preferred
Reasoning
The fullest witness gives an exact date and time attributed to his mother; this matches the corpus's existing person-record birthdate (person 6) and is corroborated unanimously across all twelve witnesses with no conflicting date anywhere.
Told / reported
1970
estimated
Reasoning
Both legacy catalog claims are marked doubtful in this lecture's own processing notes because neither fits the lecture's explicit internal self-dating; the certain internally-derived 1970 claim is preferred.
9 November 1965
estimated
Reasoning
Two independent certain sources (chrome dateline + blackout reference) agree exactly and are preferred over the demoted catalog alternatives.
18 July 1969
estimated · doubtful
Reasoning
No transcript or chrome corroboration for either claim, but the certain claim is inherently stronger than the merely probable alternative, so it is preferred rather than treated as a tie.
between 25 October 1968 and 21 August 1969
estimated · doubtful
Why
Flag for another lane: lecture 1474's two catalogue delivery claims need adjudication; neither fits its own Holy-Week internal evidence well.
Reasoning
No basis to prefer one of two equally-confident conflicting claims, so written as a between range at possible confidence per the inheritance rule rather than picking one. || v1.1/l7/told-lower: lowered `possible` -> `doubtful`. The telling-date 1968-10-25 is refuted on the source lecture (nid 1474) and no live claim on that node supports it, so the corpus can no longer say WHEN this was told. ⛔ The row is KEPT, not retired: it also records THAT nid 1474 tells this event, which is true and checkable from the passages, and retiring it would discard that with the date.
19 May 1964
estimated
Reasoning
Single, uncontested certain claim inherited unchanged.
5 May 1969
estimated · probable
Reasoning
Single dateline reading with no corroboration, so inherited at the probable confidence it was recorded with.
9 April 1963
estimated
Reasoning
Both recorded claims agree exactly with no conflict.
24 January 1969
estimated · probable
Reasoning
The lecture's own dating trail names the dateline reading as superseding the weaker inference and its own state is 'confirmed'; inherited at the probable confidence the dateline claim itself carries.
Show all 11 claims
26 July 1968
estimated
Reasoning
Two independent certain sources agree exactly.
between 1 January 1971 and 30 June 1971
estimated
Reasoning
Explicit self-dating plus an explicit reference to the upcoming July anniversary give a certain bound without a precise day, so written as a between range across the first half of 1971 rather than inventing an exact date.
after 1965
estimated · possible
Reasoning
Weak single inference bound, recorded as 'state: weak' in this lecture's own processing; inherited as possible/after rather than invented as an exact year.