Neville receives a listener's letter in the week before his 15 January 1968 lecture

Date (happened)
between 8 January 1968 and 15 January 1968
unresolved
  1. between 8 January 1968 and 15 January 1968 estimated · probable · preferred
    Source Live the Answer Now ¶1
    Why M7 dating pass (529; 525's readers, packet 002)
    Reasoning Passage 528790 opens 'Here is a letter given me this past week'; the lecture (node 1051, Live the Answer Now) has a certain delivery date of 1968-01-15, so the letter came in the preceding seven days.
  2. before 15 January 1968 bound · probable
    Source Live the Answer Now ¶1
    Reasoning Passage 528790 opens 'Here is a letter given me this past week', placing the letter's receipt shortly before the lecture in which Neville reads it out. The existing event claim (bound, before 1958-11-10) anchors this relation to the lecture's REFUTED legacy delivery date (catalog #92, refuted by L7 adjudication #2363 and an internal moon-photograph anachronism). The lecture's actual certain, preferred delivery date is 1968-01-15 (node 1051, chrome dateline, corroborated by independent catalog #402). This claim carries the same before-relation forward onto the corrected anchor instead of the refuted one. Weakest link: 'this past week' is Neville's own loose phrase, not a dated document, so confidence stays at probable even though the anchor date itself is certain.
  3. before 10 November 1958 bound · refuted
    Source bound derived from the relation in the event's own title ("before"): "Neville receives a listener's letter during the week before November 10, 1958"
    Why pm-actor-525: refuted by the M7 dating pass (529; 525's readers, packet 002): Derived from the title, which repeated the lecture's refuted 1958 legacy delivery date; the passage places the letter in the week before the 1968-01-15 telling.
    Reasoning The event held NO date claim of any kind. Its title does not state when the event happened, but it states a RELATION to a known point — "before 1958-11-10" — and that is exactly what `bound` records. Run v1.1/l1.4/titledate refused this title for a DATE, correctly, because reading an anchor as the event's own date is the laundering phase3b committed; refusing to read it as a BOUND would have thrown away real information. ⚠ Title-derived: a title here is a summary an earlier pass wrote from the passage text, so reading the text supersedes this. `bound` is never `preferred`, so the event still displays no date — which is correct, because a bound is not a date.
Place
Los Angeles
Persons
Neville Goddard
Told / reported
  1. 15 January 1968 conclusion
    Why dc1-agreement-20261004, pm-actor-551 (PM 8702)
    Reasoning 1 claim, no conflict: 1968-01-15 (node:1051).
  2. 15 January 1968 estimated
    Source Live the Answer Now
    Reasoning Passage 528790, where Neville narrates receiving and reads out this letter, sits in lecture nid=1051 ('Live the Answer Now'). That lecture's preferred delivery-date claim is 1968-01-15 (chrome dateline '1/15/68' at document head, confidence certain), independently corroborated by its own separate legacy catalog entry #402 at the same date. The lecture's other legacy claim, 1958-11-10 (catalog #92), is refuted (L7 adjudication #2363; also anachronistic against the lecture's own reference to pictures 'we're now receiving back from the moon'). field_told held no claims, so this is a first addition, not a supersession of anything. || v1.1 type repair: written as `stated` by run v1.1/l4/actor417/6000-6999-b1, retyped `estimated` — the claim cites node 1051, not a passage, so it is this lane's inference rather than something Neville said in so many words (#2117).
Sources

Source

1 tellings, oldest first. A date in brackets shows how it is known; "circa", "after" and "possible" dates are rough.
Date Lecture or book Telling Passage
1968-01-15 [exact/certain/final] Live the Answer Now Here is a letter given me this past week. She said, “A friend of mine who is a Mormon has said to me time and again, ‘You’re always reading the Bible, but you never go to church.’” And she explained to her friend that she doesn’t feel the need for a church. She likes reading the Bible and coming to her own conclusions or looking for parallels in scripture that would parallel her own experiences. Well, one day the doorbell rang and here is her friend with a group of missionaries from the Mormon Church. They’ve come to convert her. So she said, “For a moment I wanted to say I’m busy, but I… 528790