Neville's last lecture at this location in January 1964
Date (happened)
January 1964
stated · probable · preferred
Source
derived from the event's own title: "Neville's last lecture at this location in January 1964"
Reasoning
The event held NO date claim of any kind; its own title states 1964-01 (month precision, parsed as "month year"). ⚠ A title in this corpus is a DERIVED artefact — an earlier pass wrote it from the passage text — so this claim is title-derived and is marked as such rather than cited as a source document; the underlying text remains the real evidence and would supersede it. Confidence `probable`, never `certain`, for that reason. Precision is never inflated beyond the title's own wording. CALIBRATION (run v1.1/l1.4/titledate, against the 489 events that already hold an independent preferred date): day 96.1%, month 94.1% agreement. Titles naming a REFERENCE event rather than the event itself ("before", "after", "during the week of", "per ... lecture") are refused outright and never reach this write — reading an anchor as the date is the same laundering phase3b committed when it wrote telling dates onto events.
25 June 1971
stated · probable
Reasoning
Passage 531113 ('This is my last night here; so take full advantage of it') is the identity witness confirming this event -- 'Neville's last lecture at this location' -- is this specific delivery of lecture nid=1134, matching prior npr:23270/27446's same_delivery finding; it does not itself state a date. The event's only existing claim (d0, 1964-01, probable) is title-derived, and the title's implicit premise (a January 1964 delivery) is exactly the catalog value that this same packet shows is now confidence=refuted for node 1134 (L7 adjudication #2363, catalogue_block_error). The standing delivery date for node 1134 is 1971-06-25, from a chrome-harvested byline ('By Neville Goddard 25 June 1971') at confidence=probable (a single source, no independent corroboration, hence not certain). I carry that same probable confidence here rather than upgrading or further downgrading it: the identity link (passage 531113, reverse-witness confidence=certain) is solid, so the weakest link in this chain is the node's own date claim, at probable. year/month/day mirror node 1134's own d1 claim exactly since no new estimation is introduced -- this is a direct cross-application of an already-exact, already-stated value via a confirmed identity match, not a fresh inference. This claim does not edit or delete d0; it stands beside it as the packet's evidence now warrants.