A woman not present tonight told Neville that ten days before Kennedy was assassinated she saw the headline of it, on the same coloured paper it came out on.
Date (happened)
12 November 1963
unresolved
12 November 1963
stated · preferred
Told
-
10 December 1963
estimated · probable
Reasoning
Passage 550352 (reverse witness r3, linkage confidence certain), read in full, is a second independent telling of the same 'lady foresaw the Kennedy assassination headline ten days early' anecdote already witnessed via passage 531970 in lecture 1169 -- it names the 'Kennedy Shot' headline directly. This telling sits in a different lecture, node 1966 ('Repent and Believe in the Gospel'). That lecture's delivery date shows supersession in this packet: the legacy catalogue value (1963-11-10) is now doubtful/questioned_by_stronger_source because the same passage's own 'two weeks ago' reference to the assassination makes Nov 10 chronologically impossible, and the standing/preferred replacement is a chrome-byline-harvested 1963-12-10 (probable). I used the standing value, not the demoted one, and capped confidence at probable to match it, never higher. This told claim is additive, not duplicative: I added no dates claim for this event that touches node 1966's delivery date, so this does not restate the same evidence under a second label. || v1.1 type repair: written as `stated` by run v1.1/l4/actor417/6000-6999-b3, retyped `estimated` — the claim cites node 1966, not a passage, so it is this lane's inference rather than something Neville said in so many words (#2117).
Sources
Source
- Call the Next Witness ¶37 (Well, a lady who is not here this night could tell me that ten days before Kennedy was assassinated that she saw the headline on the same color paper that it was brought out ten days later.)