Untitled lecture

Neville tells (or publishes) his quartz vision, in 1946.

Date (happened)
1946
probable
  1. 1946 conclusion · probable
    Why dc1-agreement-20261004, pm-actor-551 (PM 8702)
    Reasoning All 2 claims agree on 1946: derived from the event's own title: "Neville publishes or tells his quartz visio; passage:533485.
  2. 1946 stated · probable · preferred
    Source derived from the event's own title: "Neville publishes or tells his quartz vision in 1946"
    Reasoning The event held NO date claim of any kind; its own title states 1946 (year precision, parsed as "year only"). ⚠ A title in this corpus is a DERIVED artefact — an earlier pass wrote it from the passage text — so this claim is title-derived and is marked as such rather than cited as a source document; the underlying text remains the real evidence and would supersede it. Confidence `probable`, never `certain`, for that reason. Precision is never inflated beyond the title's own wording. CALIBRATION (run v1.1/l1.4/titledate, against the 489 events that already hold an independent preferred date): day 96.1%, month 94.1% agreement. Titles naming a REFERENCE event rather than the event itself ("before", "after", "during the week of", "per ... lecture") are refused outright and never reach this write — reading an anchor as the date is the same laundering phase3b committed when it wrote telling dates onto events.
  3. 1946 stated · probable
    Source Your Creative Power ¶62
    Reasoning Passage 533485 states directly: 'he never read my book, because I told that experience back in 1946.' This is a direct first-person statement of the year this event (the telling/publishing of the quartz vision) took place, and it upgrades the prior title-derived-only claim to a witnessed one. Year only, no month/day given. Confidence probable rather than certain: the statement is unhedged but single-sourced - nothing else in the packet independently corroborates 1946 (the event's own title was itself written from this same passage per npr 77661, so it is not a second source), so it does not meet the two-converging-sources bar the packet's own certain claims use.
Persons
Neville Goddard
Told / reported
  1. 29 October 1965 conclusion
    Why dc1-agreement-20261004, pm-actor-551 (PM 8702)
    Reasoning 1 claim, no conflict: 1965-10-29 (node:1216).
  2. 29 October 1965 estimated
    Source Your Creative Power
    Reasoning This records when Neville told an audience about the 1946 telling, i.e. when the reference in passage 533485 was itself delivered - a fact distinct from the dates claim above, which never touches the carrier lecture's delivery date, so per the trap-6 consumption test a told claim is additive here. The carrier lecture (node 1216) has a standing delivery date of 1965-10-29 at confidence certain, earned by two converging sources: legacy catalog #291 (legacy_event_backfill) and an independent in-transcript chrome dateline '10/29/65' (v11_chrome_harvest) - trap 16's 'different evidence converging' case. A second delivery claim on the same node, 1969-09-26, is formally refuted (L7 adjudication #2363, shape duplicate_row, full evidence in npr 73864); that refuted row is left untouched and not used here. || v1.1 type repair: written as `stated` by run v1.1/l4/actor417/6000-6999-b5, retyped `estimated` — the claim cites node 1216, not a passage, so it is this lane's inference rather than something Neville said in so many words (#2117).
Sources

Source