Neville says that from his own experience David of biblical fame stood before him and called him Father, my Lord and the Rock of his salvation, and that with that memory returned.
Date (happened)
6 December 1959
unresolved
6 December 1959
stated · preferred
Reasoning
Neville explicitly dates the explosion in his head and appearance of his son David to 6 December 1959. That date belongs to this vision, not to the 1968 lecture in which he recounts it.
before 1971
bound · possible
Reasoning
Qualifying passage ids [528657] belong to telling lecture nids [1047]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1971 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1971 is the MIN across telling lectures.
before 1963
bound · possible
Reasoning
Qualifying passage ids [530281] belong to telling lecture nids [1101]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1963 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1963 is the MIN across telling lectures.
before 1964
bound · possible
Reasoning
Qualifying passage ids [531718] belong to telling lecture nids [1160]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1964 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1964 is the MIN across telling lectures.
before 1965
bound · possible
Reasoning
Qualifying passage ids [533909] belong to telling lecture nids [1226]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1965 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1965 is the MIN across telling lectures.
before 1967
bound · possible
Reasoning
Qualifying passage ids [534561] belong to telling lecture nids [1242]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1967 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1967 is the MIN across telling lectures.
-
c. December 1959
stated · probable
Show all 91 claims
before 1964
bound · possible
Reasoning
Qualifying passage ids [543963] belong to telling lecture nids [1776]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1964 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1964 is the MIN across telling lectures.
before 26 April 1963
bound
Why
Tightens the phase4 L6a envelope from before 1963 to before 1963-04-26.
Reasoning
L6a envelope tightened to the telling day of nid 1101 (certain delivery 1963-04-26); same premise, finer precision. The phase4 L6a bound on this event is `before 1963`, an envelope over delivery YEARS computed without reading text. Its premise is that the fact is true by the time it is told; on that same premise the DAY of the telling is a strictly better upper bound. Nothing is re-decided — the bound is stated to the precision the evidence always supported. The delivery claim for 1963-04-26 on nid 1101 is held at `certain` by the corpus, which is what carries this claim, and MIN was taken across this event's 7 certain told dates. #2274; the L6a row stands beside this one.
26 November 1959
relative · probable
Reasoning
hist_event 19520 gives a certain 1959-07-20 birth-from-above date; 129 days later is 1959-11-26. This specific telling's day-count (129) differs from other tellings elsewhere in the corpus that give 139 days -- Neville's own retellings of this sequence vary -- so the resulting date is specific to this witness passage's own numbers.
No date
relative · probable
Reasoning
Passage 532797 states 'Five months later I fulfilled the 89th Psalm. When David stood before me, I knew I was his father, as there was no uncertainty as to this relationship. I am telling you what I have experienced.' -- a direct, unhedged first-person statement, immediately following passage 532796's account of the birth-from-above vision it is counted from. The anchor is that vision (an earlier, undated-in-this-packet event), not this lecture's delivery date, per the external-undated-anchor rule: the packet gives no dated, evidenced record of the birth-from-above vision -- only a sibling event's title names 'July 20, 1959', and a title is derived, not something I have read as evidence. Recording type=relative with no year rather than importing that title's implied date. Weakest link: the anchor event's own date sits entirely outside this packet, so nothing here can be converted to a calendar date.
c. 20 December 1959
relative · possible
Reasoning
hist_event 19520 gives a certain 1959-07-20 birth-from-above date; five calendar months later is circa 1959-12-20. This is one of several tellings across the corpus giving slightly different day-counts (129, 139, or 'five months') for this same transition, so kept at possible.
c. 20 December 1959
relative · possible
Reasoning
A second, independent witnessing passage corroborating the same circa 1959-12-20 date computed from hist_event 19520's certain birth-from-above anchor; kept at possible both for the approximate wording and because this witness's own lecture is a provisional, not-yet-human-corrected ASR import.
6 December 1959
stated
Reasoning
Neville states the date directly and specifically, giving day, month and year ('the 6th day of December, l959'), consistent with the event's existing title.
6 December 1959
stated
Why
At Neville's Beverly Hills home.
Reasoning
The complete sequence explicitly dates David's appearance to 6 December 1959, after the July awakening.
before 1964
bound · possible
Reasoning
Qualifying passage ids [532337] belong to telling lecture nids [1179]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1964 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1964 is the MIN across telling lectures.
before 15 December 1964
bound
Why
Tightens the phase4 L6a envelope from before 1964 to before 1964-12-15.
Reasoning
L6a envelope tightened to the telling day of nid 1179 (certain delivery 1964-12-15); same premise, finer precision. The phase4 L6a bound on this event is `before 1964`, an envelope over delivery YEARS computed without reading text. Its premise is that the fact is true by the time it is told; on that same premise the DAY of the telling is a strictly better upper bound. Nothing is re-decided — the bound is stated to the precision the evidence always supported. The delivery claim for 1964-12-15 on nid 1179 is held at `certain` by the corpus, which is what carries this claim. #2274; the L6a row stands beside this one.
6 December 1959
relative
Reasoning
Passage 545799 identifies the David revelation as occurring 139 days after Neville's resurrection. The corpus independently holds that resurrection on 1959-07-20 at certain confidence; adding 139 days gives 1959-12-06, while passage 536376 independently places the event thirty years after 1929.
1959
stated · probable
Source
derived from the event's own title: "David reveals Neville as his father in 1959"
Reasoning
The event held NO date claim of any kind; its own title states 1959 (year precision, parsed as "year only"). ⚠ A title in this corpus is a DERIVED artefact — an earlier pass wrote it from the passage text — so this claim is title-derived and is marked as such rather than cited as a source document; the underlying text remains the real evidence and would supersede it. Confidence `probable`, never `certain`, for that reason. Precision is never inflated beyond the title's own wording. CALIBRATION (run v1.1/l1.4/titledate, against the 489 events that already hold an independent preferred date): day 96.1%, month 94.1% agreement. Titles naming a REFERENCE event rather than the event itself ("before", "after", "during the week of", "per ... lecture") are refused outright and never reach this write — reading an anchor as the date is the same laundering phase3b committed when it wrote telling dates onto events.
1959
estimated
Source
Passage 555951 says David appeared thirty years after Neville's 1929 incorporation into the risen Lord.
Reasoning
The passage gives both the 1929 anchor and a thirty-year interval, directly yielding 1959; no month or day is stated here.
1959
stated
Reasoning
Neville directly states the year (1959) and his age (54) for when this understanding unfolded within him; the age is internally consistent with his 1905 birth year, giving certain confidence for the year, though no month or day is given.
-
6 December 1959
stated · probable
6 December 1959
stated · probable
Source
"one night here in Beverly Hills", told in God's Son (nid 2126)
1929
stated
Source
"In 1929", told in All Things Are Possible (1967-11-03) (nid 2301)
1959
stated
Source
Absolute relative anchor: David's appearance is explicitly thirty years after the passage's 1929 incorporation event.
Reasoning
The event title and description include both the 1929 incorporation and David's later revelation. Passage 555951 states the first occurred in 1929 and David appeared thirty years later; 1929 + 30 = 1959. This is event-specific and independent of carrier-date arithmetic.
6 December 1959
estimated · probable
Why
M7 dating pass (529; 525's readers, packet 018)
Reasoning
139 days after the certain 1959-07-20 awakening lands on 6 December 1959, matching the corpus's independently well-established David-revelation date (event 6885).
before 1964
bound · possible
Reasoning
Qualifying passage ids [532239] belong to telling lecture nids [1176]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1964 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1964 is the MIN across telling lectures.
before 1964
bound · possible
Reasoning
Qualifying passage ids [532369] belong to telling lecture nids [1180]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1964 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1964 is the MIN across telling lectures.
before 1965
bound · possible
Reasoning
Qualifying passage ids [532848] belong to telling lecture nids [1198]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1965 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1965 is the MIN across telling lectures.
before 1965
bound · possible
Reasoning
Qualifying passage ids [533506] belong to telling lecture nids [1217]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1965 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1965 is the MIN across telling lectures.
before 1967
bound · possible
Reasoning
Qualifying passage ids [536821] belong to telling lecture nids [1313]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1967 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1967 is the MIN across telling lectures.
before 1 December 1964
bound
Why
Tightens the phase4 L6a envelope from before 1964 to before 1964-12-01.
Reasoning
L6a envelope tightened to the telling day of nid 1176 (certain delivery 1964-12-01); same premise, finer precision. The phase4 L6a bound on this event is `before 1964`, an envelope over delivery YEARS computed without reading text. Its premise is that the fact is true by the time it is told; on that same premise the DAY of the telling is a strictly better upper bound. Nothing is re-decided — the bound is stated to the precision the evidence always supported. The delivery claim for 1964-12-01 on nid 1176 is held at `certain` by the corpus, which is what carries this claim, and MIN was taken across this event's 5 certain told dates. #2274; the L6a row stands beside this one.
6 December 1959
estimated · probable
Why
M7 dating pass (529; 525's readers, packet 008)
Reasoning
Passage 528135 gives the interval 'a hundred and thirty-nine days later' between the birth vision (20 July 1959) and the vision of David, i.e. 6 Dec 1959; chronology events 6885, 16718, 7558 agree.
No date
relative
Reasoning
Passage 541397 explicitly places David's revelation 139 days after the individual's birth-from-above experience. The packet does not date that starting event, so the exact relative order and interval can be retained but no calendar year may be inferred.
6 December 1959
estimated · probable
Why
M7 dating pass (529; 525's readers, packet 031)
Reasoning
Passage 541397 gives 139 days between birth from above and David's revelation; the birth from above is 1959-07-20 (1274) and 20 July plus 139 days is 6 December 1959, the date of 6885. The passage is stated as a general pattern, hence probable.
No date
relative · probable
Reasoning
Passage 550541 (lecture nid 1973, 'The World Is Imaginal in Character', delivered 1968-04-26), following on from passage 550540 where Neville says 'I'll tell you from my own personal experience the pattern', states his own mystical sequence: resurrection followed instantly by birth from above, 'then a passage of months, five months, and then comes the discovery of his Son ... David of biblical fame.' This gives the interval between the two experiences (five months) but no calendar date for either endpoint anywhere in this packet, so only a relative claim is supportable.
c. December 1959
estimated · probable
Why
M7 dating pass (529; 525's readers, packet 031)
Reasoning
Passage 550541: 'a passage of months, five months' between birth from above and the discovery of his Son David; the birth is 1959-07-20 (1274), the 139-day figure of 7574 gives 1959-12-06, and 6885, 18828 place it in December 1959.
before 1969
bound · possible
Reasoning
Qualifying passage ids [528013] belong to telling lecture nids [1025]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1969 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1969 is the MIN across telling lectures.
before 29 September 1969
bound
Why
Tightens the phase4 L6a envelope from before 1969 to before 1969-09-29.
Reasoning
L6a envelope tightened to the telling day of nid 1025 (certain delivery 1969-09-29); same premise, finer precision. The phase4 L6a bound on this event is `before 1969`, an envelope over delivery YEARS computed without reading text. Its premise is that the fact is true by the time it is told; on that same premise the DAY of the telling is a strictly better upper bound. Nothing is re-decided — the bound is stated to the precision the evidence always supported. The delivery claim for 1969-09-29 on nid 1025 is held at `certain` by the corpus, which is what carries this claim. #2274; the L6a row stands beside this one.
6 December 1959
estimated · probable
Why
M7 dating pass (529; 525's readers, packet 026)
Reasoning
Passage 528013: 'One day David came out of me. He stood before me ... even before he called me father.' Chronology dates the David appearance 1959-12-06 (6885, 7558, 16718, 18756 and others; 139 days after 1959-07-20), one variant giving 1959-12-20 (7860).
before 1968
bound · possible
Reasoning
Qualifying passage ids [533209] belong to telling lecture nids [1209]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1968 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1968 is the MIN across telling lectures.
before 28 May 1965
bound
Why
Tightens the obsolete pre-1968 envelope after L7 corrected the lecture delivery.
Reasoning
The whole witness recounts the experience as already past. L7 established 1965-05-28 as the surviving certain delivery date of nid 1209, so the event necessarily occurred before that telling day; the passage supplies no safe finer date.
6 December 1959
estimated · probable
Why
M7 dating pass (529; 525's readers, packet 011)
Reasoning
Passage 533209: 'this explosion in my brain, and suddenly standing before me is David of biblical fame, and David calls me my Father.' The same event is dated 1959-12-06 in the chronology (6885 and duplicates).
before 1967
bound · possible
Reasoning
Qualifying passage ids [534875] belong to telling lecture nids [1252]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1967 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1967 is the MIN across telling lectures.
before 1969
bound · possible
Reasoning
Qualifying passage ids [541332] belong to telling lecture nids [1502]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1969 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1969 is the MIN across telling lectures.
before 7 October 1966
bound · probable
Why
Existing d0 (before 1967, possible) for this witness left standing; this narrows the same window using the better-evidenced delivery date.
Reasoning
The revelation recounted in passage 534875 must have happened before this telling. The prior envelope bound for this witness (before 1967) used the catalog's 1967-01-18 as the MAX non-refuted year even though that catalog claim is only possible; the better-evidenced delivery date is 1966-10-07 (chrome, probable, Friday-consistent). This tightens the bound by over three months. || v1.1 type repair: written as `estimated` by run v1.1/l4/c0y, retyped `bound` — a `before` claim is an outer limit, which the lane brief and 97% of the corpus type as `bound`.
before 17 November 1969
bound · probable
Why
Existing d1 (before 1969, possible) for this witness left standing; this narrows the same window.
Reasoning
The revelation recounted in passage 541332 must have happened before this telling. The prior envelope bound for this witness (before 1969, year only) can be tightened to the day using the node's own delivery date. Capped at probable rather than inheriting certain because this delivery claim is an unreviewed legacy catalog row with no independent chrome or internal corroboration in this packet, per the evidence-hierarchy caution against catalogue backfill. || v1.1 type repair: written as `estimated` by run v1.1/l4/c0y, retyped `bound` — a `before` claim is an outer limit, which the lane brief and 97% of the corpus type as `bound`.
6 December 1959
estimated · probable
Why
M7 dating pass (529; 525's readers, packet 013)
Reasoning
Passage 534875: 'Only through the revelation of his Son, David, who in the Spirit called me, Father.' The David appearance is dated 6 December 1959, 139 days after the 1959-07-20 awakening (events 6885, 7558, 16718, 8087).
before 1967
bound · possible
Reasoning
Qualifying passage ids [535636] belong to telling lecture nids [1277]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1967 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1967 is the MIN across telling lectures.
before 17 April 1967
bound
Why
Tightens the phase4 L6a envelope from before 1967 to before 1967-04-17.
Reasoning
L6a envelope tightened to the telling day of nid 1277 (certain delivery 1967-04-17); same premise, finer precision. The phase4 L6a bound on this event is `before 1967`, an envelope over delivery YEARS computed without reading text. Its premise is that the fact is true by the time it is told; on that same premise the DAY of the telling is a strictly better upper bound. Nothing is re-decided — the bound is stated to the precision the evidence always supported. The delivery claim for 1967-04-17 on nid 1277 is held at `certain` by the corpus, which is what carries this claim. #2274; the L6a row stands beside this one.
6 December 1959
estimated · probable
Why
M7 dating pass (529; 525's readers, packet 015)
Reasoning
Passage 535636: 'when I stood in the presence of David and he called me Father... I felt myself the Ancient of Days.' The chronology carries many certain-dated records of David calling him Father on 1959-12-06 (e.g. 6885, 7558, 16718).
before 1968
bound · possible
Reasoning
Qualifying passage ids [535929] belong to telling lecture nids [1285]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1968 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1968 is the MIN across telling lectures.
before 22 March 1968
bound
Why
Tightens the phase4 L6a envelope from before 1968 to before 1968-03-22.
Reasoning
L6a envelope tightened to the telling day of nid 1285 (certain delivery 1968-03-22); same premise, finer precision. The phase4 L6a bound on this event is `before 1968`, an envelope over delivery YEARS computed without reading text. Its premise is that the fact is true by the time it is told; on that same premise the DAY of the telling is a strictly better upper bound. Nothing is re-decided — the bound is stated to the precision the evidence always supported. The delivery claim for 1968-03-22 on nid 1285 is held at `certain` by the corpus, which is what carries this claim. #2274; the L6a row stands beside this one.
6 December 1959
estimated · probable
Why
M7 dating pass (529; 525's readers, packet 019)
Reasoning
Passage 535929: after his resurrection David called him Father. The chronology dates that calling to 1959-12-06 in many events (e.g. 6885, 16718), 139 days after the 1959-07-20 awakening (event 1274).
before 1968
bound · possible
Reasoning
Qualifying passage ids [537884] belong to telling lecture nids [1349]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1968 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1968 is the MIN across telling lectures.
before 8 April 1968
bound
Why
Tightens the phase4 L6a envelope from before 1968 to before 1968-04-08.
Reasoning
L6a envelope tightened to the telling day of nid 1349 (certain delivery 1968-04-08); same premise, finer precision. The phase4 L6a bound on this event is `before 1968`, an envelope over delivery YEARS computed without reading text. Its premise is that the fact is true by the time it is told; on that same premise the DAY of the telling is a strictly better upper bound. Nothing is re-decided — the bound is stated to the precision the evidence always supported. The delivery claim for 1968-04-08 on nid 1349 is held at `certain` by the corpus, which is what carries this claim. #2274; the L6a row stands beside this one.
before 1968
bound · possible
Reasoning
Qualifying passage ids [538118] belong to telling lecture nids [1356]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1968 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1968 is the MIN across telling lectures.
before 1 May 1968
bound
Why
Tightens the phase4 L6a envelope from before 1968 to before 1968-05-01.
Reasoning
L6a envelope tightened to the telling day of nid 1356 (certain delivery 1968-05-01); same premise, finer precision. The phase4 L6a bound on this event is `before 1968`, an envelope over delivery YEARS computed without reading text. Its premise is that the fact is true by the time it is told; on that same premise the DAY of the telling is a strictly better upper bound. Nothing is re-decided — the bound is stated to the precision the evidence always supported. The delivery claim for 1968-05-01 on nid 1356 is held at `certain` by the corpus, which is what carries this claim. #2274; the L6a row stands beside this one.
before 1968
bound · possible
Reasoning
Qualifying passage ids [542921] belong to telling lecture nids [1751]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1968 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1968 is the MIN across telling lectures.
before 24 July 1968
bound
Why
Tightens the phase4 L6a envelope from before 1968 to before 1968-07-24.
Reasoning
L6a envelope tightened to the telling day of nid 1751 (certain delivery 1968-07-24); same premise, finer precision. The phase4 L6a bound on this event is `before 1968`, an envelope over delivery YEARS computed without reading text. Its premise is that the fact is true by the time it is told; on that same premise the DAY of the telling is a strictly better upper bound. Nothing is re-decided — the bound is stated to the precision the evidence always supported. The delivery claim for 1968-07-24 on nid 1751 is held at `certain` by the corpus, which is what carries this claim. #2274; the L6a row stands beside this one.
6 December 1959
estimated · probable
Why
M7 dating pass (529; 525's readers, packet 021)
Reasoning
Passage 542921 ('He came out and stood before me and called me Father') is the David vision, which he dates in passage 538640 (lecture 1377, 13 Sept 1968) to 6 December 1959 by his Bible annotation next to Psalm 89. Many chronology events carry this date, e.g. 6885 and 16718.
before 1964
bound · possible
Reasoning
Qualifying passage ids [545592] belong to telling lecture nids [1821]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1964 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1964 is the MIN across telling lectures.
before 19 May 1964
bound
Why
Tightens the phase4 L6a envelope from before 1964 to before 1964-05-19.
Reasoning
L6a envelope tightened to the telling day of nid 1821 (certain delivery 1964-05-19); same premise, finer precision. The phase4 L6a bound on this event is `before 1964`, an envelope over delivery YEARS computed without reading text. Its premise is that the fact is true by the time it is told; on that same premise the DAY of the telling is a strictly better upper bound. Nothing is re-decided — the bound is stated to the precision the evidence always supported. The delivery claim for 1964-05-19 on nid 1821 is held at `certain` by the corpus, which is what carries this claim. #2274; the L6a row stands beside this one.
6 December 1959
estimated · probable
Why
M7 dating pass (529; 525's readers, packet 008)
Reasoning
In passage 545592 David calls him Father and he answers 'I am'; this is his account of the vision of David, dated 6 Dec 1959 (20 July 1959 + 139 days) in events 6885, 16718 and 7558, and in the sibling record 5924.
before 1971
bound · possible
Reasoning
Qualifying passage ids [547198] belong to telling lecture nids [1861]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1971 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1971 is the MIN across telling lectures.
before 21 June 1971
bound
Why
Tightens the phase4 L6a envelope from before 1971 to before 1971-06-21.
Reasoning
L6a envelope tightened to the telling day of nid 1861 (certain delivery 1971-06-21); same premise, finer precision. The phase4 L6a bound on this event is `before 1971`, an envelope over delivery YEARS computed without reading text. Its premise is that the fact is true by the time it is told; on that same premise the DAY of the telling is a strictly better upper bound. Nothing is re-decided — the bound is stated to the precision the evidence always supported. The delivery claim for 1971-06-21 on nid 1861 is held at `certain` by the corpus, which is what carries this claim. #2274; the L6a row stands beside this one.
before 1971
bound
Source
Telling passage 556723; lecture 3994 delivery.
Reasoning
Completed personal occurrence predates its earliest usable telling.
-
before 1968
bound · possible
Source
qualifying source passages 544675; telling lecture nids 1796
Reasoning
Qualifying passage ids [544675] belong to telling lecture nids [1796]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1968 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1968 is the MIN across telling lectures.
before 12 January 1968
bound · probable
Reasoning
Neville recounts the completed vision in node 1796; its authoritative delivery is 1968-01-12 probable, furnishing the supported upper bound.
before 1966
bound · possible
Reasoning
Qualifying passage ids [534740] belong to telling lecture nids [1248]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1966 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1966 is the MIN across telling lectures.
before 22 November 1966
bound
Why
Tightens the phase4 L6a envelope from before 1966 to before 1966-11-22.
Reasoning
L6a envelope tightened to the telling day of nid 1248 (certain delivery 1966-11-22); same premise, finer precision. The phase4 L6a bound on this event is `before 1966`, an envelope over delivery YEARS computed without reading text. Its premise is that the fact is true by the time it is told; on that same premise the DAY of the telling is a strictly better upper bound. Nothing is re-decided — the bound is stated to the precision the evidence always supported. The delivery claim for 1966-11-22 on nid 1248 is held at `certain` by the corpus, which is what carries this claim. #2274; the L6a row stands beside this one.
before 22 November 1966
bound
Reasoning
The completed vision predates node 1248 authoritative, first-party-supported 1966-11-22 delivery.
before 1967
bound · possible
Reasoning
Qualifying passage ids [534781] belong to telling lecture nids [1249]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1967 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1967 is the MIN across telling lectures.
before 27 March 1967
bound
Reasoning
The completed vision predates node 1249 authoritative, independently corroborated 1967-03-27 delivery.
before 1968
bound · possible
Reasoning
Qualifying passage ids [537725] belong to telling lecture nids [1344]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1968 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1968 is the MIN across telling lectures.
before 29 March 1968
bound
Why
Tightens the phase4 L6a envelope from before 1968 to before 1968-03-29.
Reasoning
L6a envelope tightened to the telling day of nid 1344 (certain delivery 1968-03-29); same premise, finer precision. The phase4 L6a bound on this event is `before 1968`, an envelope over delivery YEARS computed without reading text. Its premise is that the fact is true by the time it is told; on that same premise the DAY of the telling is a strictly better upper bound. Nothing is re-decided — the bound is stated to the precision the evidence always supported. The delivery claim for 1968-03-29 on nid 1344 is held at `certain` by the corpus, which is what carries this claim. #2274; the L6a row stands beside this one.
before 1968
bound · possible
Reasoning
Qualifying passage ids [538679] belong to telling lecture nids [1379]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1968 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1968 is the MIN across telling lectures.
before 23 September 1968
bound
Why
Tightens the phase4 L6a envelope from before 1968 to before 1968-09-23.
Reasoning
L6a envelope tightened to the telling day of nid 1379 (certain delivery 1968-09-23); same premise, finer precision. The phase4 L6a bound on this event is `before 1968`, an envelope over delivery YEARS computed without reading text. Its premise is that the fact is true by the time it is told; on that same premise the DAY of the telling is a strictly better upper bound. Nothing is re-decided — the bound is stated to the precision the evidence always supported. The delivery claim for 1968-09-23 on nid 1379 is held at `certain` by the corpus, which is what carries this claim. #2274; the L6a row stands beside this one.
6 December 1959
stated · probable
before 1971
bound · possible
Reasoning
Qualifying passage ids [554624] belong to telling lecture nids [2174]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1971 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1971 is the MIN across telling lectures.
before 1971
bound · possible
Reasoning
Qualifying passage ids [554869] belong to telling lecture nids [2181]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1971 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1971 is the MIN across telling lectures.
c. 1959
stated · probable
before 1963
bound · possible
Reasoning
Qualifying passage ids [555684] belong to telling lecture nids [2239]. Each listed lecture contributes the selected safe envelope year 1963 (MAX of its non-refuted delivery years); 1963 is the MIN across telling lectures.
before 26 November 1963
bound
Why
M7 dating pass (529; 525's readers, packet 036)
Reasoning
Lecture 2239 ('Advent: The Four Tears') is delivered 1963-11-26, certain in five passage entries.
-
between 26 November 1959 and 27 November 1959
relative · probable
Why
Prior row (1959-11-26, stated/exact/certain, run corpus v1 / phase3b) left in place per append-only rule; this row supersedes it in substance.
Reasoning
This is a relative offset from hist_event:1048's certain-preferred birth-from-above date (1959-07-21), not a directly stated absolute date, so type=relative rather than stated; the prior row's source_id (531086) pointed to the following paragraph, not the one containing the 129-day text. Exclusive day counting (1959-07-21 + 129 days) gives 1959-11-27; the inclusive/ordinal convention ('the 129th day', i.e. +128) gives 1959-11-26, which is what the prior certain/exact row silently assumed. Both are defensible readings of the source's own vague phrasing, so recorded as a between-range rather than a single exact certain day.
20 July 1959
stated · refuted
Why
pm-actor-525: refuted by the M7 dating pass (529; 525's readers, packet 018): Dates the awakening anchor, not the child's birth 139 days later that this event actually describes.
26 November 1959
stated · refuted
Why
pm-actor-525: Passage 531086 gives no date; the vision of David is dated by Neville 'the sixth day of December ... 1959' (passages 551221, 535466, 545799, 549701) (525).
Told / reported
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4 December 1965
stated · probable
Why
Corrects the confidence of the told claim written by run `corpus v1 / phase3b` at delta 3 on this event; that claim is left standing per append-only. Ceiling rule #2132.
Reasoning
Confidence only; the date is not re-adjudicated and is left exactly as written. This claim is derived from the delivery claims of node 1226 and asserts `certain`, but the strongest claim that node carries is `probable`, so there is nothing for `certain` to inherit from. nid 1226 delivery claims: 1965-12-4 doubtful; 1965-12-7 probable. Walked back to `probable`, the ceiling. Whether the DATE is right is a separate question this row does not touch; if the evidence turns out to support more confidence, it will have to come from a source other than this node.
Show all 67 claims
4 October 1966
estimated
Why
Lane L7 (#2354) re-derivation. Supersedes in substance, not in storage, the refuted-date told claim(s) on this event; those rows stand per append-only.
Reasoning
Re-derived, not walked down. The existing told claim(s) on this event took their date from a delivery claim on node 1242 that the corpus has since REFUTED, so the corpus was asserting that Neville told this on a day it separately says he did not lecture. That is a contradiction rather than an over-confidence, and lowering the confidence would have hidden it instead of resolving it. The refutation stands and the told claim is the wrong side of it. Node 1242 surviving (non-refuted) claim: 1966-10-4 at `certain`. All claims on the node: 1966-10-4 certain; 1967-1-17 refuted; 1966-10-4 certain (preferred). Superseded here: delta 4: 1967-01-17 at `certain` (run `corpus v1 / phase3b`). The telling is dated by its lecture, so with the refuted date removed from consideration the surviving claim is what the telling inherits, at that claim own confidence and no higher.
16 May 1969
estimated · probable
Reasoning
The mystical sequence is narrated in lecture 1072. Its only standing delivery claim is the chrome dateline 1969-05-16 at probable confidence (filed as an l1 candidate); the 1960 catalog claim it conflicted with was refuted since the lecture's own text about a 'new President who has just gone into the White House' fits Nixon's January 1969 inauguration, not 1960. The told claim inherits the probable ceiling of the delivery claim it is derived from.
between 31 January 1964 and 25 June 1971
bound · doubtful
Why
Already flagged to lane L1 by the node's own prior processing; not resolved here.
Reasoning
The node's own chrome-harvest annotation records the conflict and explicitly flags it to lane L1 without resolving it, and nothing in this passage adjudicates between the two years; written as a between range rather than silently picked. || v1.1/l7/told-lower: lowered `possible` -> `doubtful`. The telling-date 1964-01-31 is refuted on the source lecture (nid 1134) and no live claim on that node supports it, so the corpus can no longer say WHEN this was told. ⛔ The row is KEPT, not retired: it also records THAT nid 1134 tells this event, which is true and checkable from the passages, and retiring it would discard that with the date.
25 June 1971
estimated · probable
Why
Lane L7 (#2354) re-derivation. Supersedes in substance, not in storage, the refuted-date told claim(s) on this event; those rows stand per append-only.
Reasoning
Re-derived, not walked down. The existing told claim(s) on this event took their date from a delivery claim on node 1134 that the corpus has since REFUTED, so the corpus was asserting that Neville told this on a day it separately says he did not lecture. That is a contradiction rather than an over-confidence, and lowering the confidence would have hidden it instead of resolving it. The refutation stands and the told claim is the wrong side of it. Node 1134 surviving (non-refuted) claim: 1971-6-25 at `probable`. All claims on the node: 1964-1-31 refuted; 1971-6-25 probable (preferred). Superseded here: delta 0: 1964-01-31 at `possible` (run `v1.1/l4/w1/B1`). The telling is dated by its lecture, so with the refuted date removed from consideration the surviving claim is what the telling inherits, at that claim own confidence and no higher.
28 February 1969
estimated · probable
Reasoning
Passage 532797, the certain-linkage reverse witness for this event, sits inside lecture node 1196. The dates claim above is relative-only and never consumes the lecture's delivery date, so per the trap-6 test this told claim is additive rather than a restatement of the same evidence. Node 1196's standing delivery-date claim is 1969-02-28 at confidence=probable, drawn from the transcript's own pre-strip dateline ('Neville Goddard 2-28-1969') bracketed by the lecture's own matching title. The earlier catalog claim of 1965-03-05 on this same node carries confidence=refuted per L7 adjudication #2363 (catalogue_block_error) and is not used. Capped at the lecture's own probable confidence since I am relying on its standing claim, not independently re-verifying it. || v1.1 type repair: written as `stated` by run v1.1/l4/actor417/6000-6999-b4, retyped `estimated` — the claim cites node 1196, not a passage, so it is this lane's inference rather than something Neville said in so many words (#2117).
3 April 1967
estimated
Reasoning
No conflict: both delivery claims independently agree on the same date, one from the legacy catalog and one from the lecture's own removed chrome byline, so field_told inherits 1967-04-03 at high confidence.
22 September 1967
estimated
Reasoning
The lecture in which this teaching is given carries a certain delivery claim of 1967-09-22 from the page's own site-nav header, which independently confirms the catalog's primary date and contradicts a competing doubtful catalog claim of 1968-07-18; the telling cannot be more certain than that delivery claim.
-
13 June 1969
stated
Reasoning
Passage 545799 directly recounts the David revelation. Its owning lecture nid 1825 has an independently corroborated transcript dateline of 1969-06-13 at certain confidence.
3 November 1967
estimated
Source
Preferred live delivery claim on nid 2301.
Reasoning
The lecture title/source packet explicitly carries 1967-11-03 as its delivery date.
1972
estimated
Reasoning
Neville recounts this experience during 'David Christ'; the lecture's own delivery date is fixed at 1972 (certain, stated). The telling and the happening are not the same moment here -- the vision described long predates the lecture -- so this is written as field_told, inheriting the delivery claim's certain confidence since equating told-date to delivery-date needs no further inferential step.
after 6 December 1959
bound · possible
Reasoning
The lecture's only delivery claim is a weak bound: it must postdate the independently-dated David vision of 1959-12-06, but the evidence does not fix how much later, so this is recorded as an 'after' bound at the claim's own possible confidence.
12 June 1970
estimated
Reasoning
The assigned witness occurs in lecture 41, securely dated 1970-06-12.
c. 1970
estimated · probable
Reasoning
Passage 545799 is Neville himself describing the revelation of David as God's Son coming '139 days after my resurrection and birth from above'. The lecture containing it (nid 1825) carries a year-only delivery claim of circa 1970 at probable confidence; the telling inherits that same year and precision.
1972
estimated · probable
Reasoning
Passage 550730 directly recounts Neville's Beverly Hills vision of David and Goliath's severed head within lecture node 1980. The authoritative L7 adjudication rejects the 1969-07-20 lower-bound row as a delivery date and leaves the carrier at year-only 1972, probable. Because the telling date is inherited from the node and has no month or day, this told claim is estimated/exact at year precision and probable, the carrier's ceiling.
1972
stated · probable
Source
God's Son (nid 2126), telling 2126-2, told 1972
1972
estimated · probable
Reasoning
Passages 553494-553496 clearly tell this event in lecture node 2126. The delivery year 1972 is supported by a probable catalogue claim and separately by a possible bare-year chrome header, so probable is the honest cap. Because this told date is inferred from the lecture node, its type is estimated, not stated.
c. 1972
estimated · possible
Reasoning
Passage 550241 recounts, in the third person, the standard account of Neville's own awakening and the birth of the child 139 days later; this is a telling of a past event, not the speech act itself. The owning lecture (nid 1963, 'False Gods') carries only one delivery claim, an estimated circa-1972 guess at possible confidence taken from the site's own 'Date unknown (1972)' hedge, so the telling cannot be more confident than that.
-
-
-
-
7 December 1967
stated · doubtful
8 December 1967
estimated
Reasoning
Passage 536821 directly recounts David calling Neville Father in this certainly dated carrier. || v1.1 type repair: written as `stated` by run v1.1/l4/actor425/5000-5999-b1, retyped `estimated` — the claim cites node 1313, not a passage, so it is this lane's inference rather than something Neville said in so many words (#2117).
7 October 1968
estimated
Reasoning
Passage 528135 directly recounts David calling Neville Father in this certainly dated carrier. || v1.1 type repair: written as `stated` by run v1.1/l4/actor425/5000-5999-b1, retyped `estimated` — the claim cites node 1028, not a passage, so it is this lane's inference rather than something Neville said in so many words (#2117).
1 December 1969
estimated
Reasoning
Passage 541397 clearly records the telling in lecture node 1506. Its exact 1969-12-01 delivery is independently corroborated by catalogue #626 and the pre-strip 12/1/69 chrome dateline, so the told claim inherits certain confidence.
-
28 May 1965
estimated
Why
Lane L7 (#2354) re-derivation. Supersedes in substance, not in storage, the refuted-date told claim(s) on this event; those rows stand per append-only.
Reasoning
Re-derived, not walked down. The existing told claim(s) on this event took their date from a delivery claim on node 1209 that the corpus has since REFUTED, so the corpus was asserting that Neville told this on a day it separately says he did not lecture. That is a contradiction rather than an over-confidence, and lowering the confidence would have hidden it instead of resolving it. The refutation stands and the told claim is the wrong side of it. Node 1209 surviving (non-refuted) claim: 1965-5-28 at `certain`. All claims on the node: 1965-2-19 refuted; 1965-5-28 certain; 1968-??-?? refuted; 1965-5-28 certain (preferred). Superseded here: delta 0: 1968-00-00 at `certain` (run `corpus v1 / phase3b`). The telling is dated by its lecture, so with the refuted date removed from consideration the surviving claim is what the telling inherits, at that claim own confidence and no higher.
-
7 October 1966
estimated · probable
Why
Lane L7 (#2354) re-derivation. Supersedes in substance, not in storage, the refuted-date told claim(s) on this event; those rows stand per append-only.
Reasoning
Re-derived, not walked down. The existing told claim(s) on this event took their date from a delivery claim on node 1252 that the corpus has since REFUTED, so the corpus was asserting that Neville told this on a day it separately says he did not lecture. That is a contradiction rather than an over-confidence, and lowering the confidence would have hidden it instead of resolving it. The refutation stands and the told claim is the wrong side of it. Node 1252 surviving (non-refuted) claim: 1966-10-7 at `probable`. All claims on the node: 1967-1-18 refuted; 1966-10-7 probable (preferred). Superseded here: delta 0: 1967-01-18 at `certain` (run `corpus v1 / phase3b`) | delta 2: 1967-01-18 at `probable` (run `v1.1/l4/ceiling/c2`). The telling is dated by its lecture, so with the refuted date removed from consideration the surviving claim is what the telling inherits, at that claim own confidence and no higher.
-
-
-
-
-
24 July 1968
estimated
Source
delivery claim d1 on lecture nid 3961: chrome header dateline '07-24-1968', corroborated by nid 1751 (hist_event 466)
Reasoning
The passage is Neville telling this within the lecture, so the telling date equals the lecture's delivery date; that delivery claim is stated/certain (chrome-header dateline, cross-corroborated with the near-identical companion transcript), so the derived told claim can stand at certain, at the ceiling of what it rests on.
-
-
21 June 1971
estimated
Source
delivery claim d1 on lecture nid 3994 -- confirmed page header 'June 21, 1971', sharpening the lecture's other delivery claim (June 1971, from the 12-years-since-July-1959 reference) with no conflict
Reasoning
Passage 556723 is Neville himself stating, in first person, that he found David, who cried out the words of Psalm 89 calling him Father, revealing his own divine identity; this is the telling. The lecture containing it, nid 3994, is dated 1971-06-21 by its confirmed page-header delivery claim, which sits inside the lecture's coarser June-1971 estimate. The telling inherits the header claim's exact/certain precision and confidence.
20 September 1969
stated · doubtful
24 July 1968
stated · doubtful
Source
The Man Within (nid 1796), telling 1796-7, told 1968-07-24
12 January 1968
estimated · probable
Reasoning
Node 1796's preferred chrome-dateline claim is 1968-01-12 probable; the conflicting July catalogue date was adjudicated doubtful. || v1.1 type repair: written as `stated` by run v1.1/l4/actor453/17500-17999-b1, retyped `estimated` — the claim cites node 1796, not a passage, so it is this lane's inference rather than something Neville said in so many words (#2117).
-
4 January 1967
stated · doubtful
-
-
14 February 1969
estimated · probable
Reasoning
Passage 550620 is Neville recounting on the platform the night his skull opened and David revealed him as Father; the lecture carrying this telling (nid 1978) is dated 1969-02-14 by its sole delivery claim, so the telling inherits that date at the same precision.
-
-
12 January 1968
estimated · probable
Reasoning
The passage is Neville recounting this vision within the lecture, so the telling date equals the lecture's delivery date; that delivery claim is stated but only probable confidence, so the derived told claim is capped at probable, not raised to certain.
-
24 November 1963
stated · doubtful
26 July 1968
estimated
Reasoning
Passage 551221 is carried by lecture node 1999, whose explicit recovered opening dateline establishes delivery on 1968-07-26 at certain confidence. This node-derived telling claim is therefore estimated/certain.
22 November 1971
estimated · probable
Reasoning
Passage 549701 is carried by lecture node 1946, whose source-document dateline establishes delivery on 1971-11-22 at probable confidence. This node-derived telling claim inherits that ceiling and is typed estimated.
25 June 1971
stated · probable
Why
The stale 1964-01-31 told row is left in place per append-only rule; this row is the corrected telling date.
Reasoning
The existing field_told row (1964-01-31, certain) copied the lecture's catalog claim (#188), which lane L1.4 (npr:57981) has since explicitly downgraded to doubtful, finding the chrome byline '25 June 1971' -- an unwrapped, unambiguous day-month-year dateline at the literal head of the transcript -- materially stronger evidence for this specific transcript. L0.5b's preferred-normalisation pass (npr:62099/62100) also flipped preferred from the 1964 claim to the 1971 claim. The lecture carries no certain delivery claim, so confidence here is capped at probable per the inheritance ceiling.
17 January 1967
stated · refuted
Reasoning
|| v1.1/l7/told-close: the delivery claim this was derived from (nid 1242, 1967-1-17) was refuted by the L7 adjudication (#2363). The corrected told claim from the same lecture stands at 1966-10-4. This row is retired rather than deleted so the derivation history remains readable.
1968
stated · refuted
Reasoning
|| v1.1/l7/told-close: the delivery claim this was derived from (nid 1209, 1968--) was refuted by the L7 adjudication (#2363). The corrected told claim from the same lecture stands at 1965-5-28. This row is retired rather than deleted so the derivation history remains readable.
18 January 1967
stated · refuted
Reasoning
|| v1.1/l7/told-close: the delivery claim this was derived from (nid 1252, 1967-1-18) was refuted by the L7 adjudication (#2363). The corrected told claim from the same lecture stands at 1966-10-7. This row is retired rather than deleted so the derivation history remains readable.
31 January 1964
stated · refuted
Reasoning
|| v1.1/l7/told-lower: lowered `certain` -> `doubtful`. The telling-date 1964-01-31 is refuted on the source lecture (nid 1134) and no live claim on that node supports it, so the corpus can no longer say WHEN this was told. ⛔ The row is KEPT, not retired: it also records THAT nid 1134 tells this event, which is true and checkable from the passages, and retiring it would discard that with the date. || v1.1/l7/told-close-residue: the delivery claim this was derived from (nid 1134, 1964-1-31) is now refuted. The corrected told claim from the same lecture stands at 1971-6-25. This row is retired rather than deleted so the derivation history remains readable.
Sources
Source
- The Secret of Imagining ¶25 (And so, I stood, and here is David, and I knew it beyond all doubt that here is my son, and my son is David, . . not a David, . . the David . . the only David . . the David of biblical fame.)
- Life Has a Purpose ¶20 (How can I explain to anyone this peculiar, mysterious experience where David of biblical fame—go back now unnumbered centuries—and out of my own skull comes a child, David?)
- The Mystery Hidden for Ages ¶29 (I felt it; I felt the explosion when he raised him up. And then there was no doubt in my mind when I saw David, the David; the David of biblical fame. Not just a David, the David. I have two nephews and a nephew’s son who are called David.)
- The State of Paul ¶52 (For when I meet a person like David and David is supposed to have lived 3,000 years before I was born…I come into the presence of David and I am his senior, I am his father.)
- Eternity Within ¶17 (David has called me Father and one day he will call you Father.)
- Whatever You Believe in and Persist in Will Come to Pass ¶2 (Thirty years later when the Son, David of biblical fame, broke within me as I exploded within myself and he stood before me, I didn’t have to ask anything…he called me Father.)
- Resurrection ¶27 (Leaning against the side of an open door, and looking out on a pastoral scene, is his son David of Biblical fame. He is a youth in his early teens. David addresses him as “My Father.”)
- The Last Days Son ¶17 (I don’t care what sculpture of David is now in the Vatican. I don’t care what painter paints the David. Until you see him you can’t paint him. And I defy anyone to capture the beauty of that David on canvas, that David in marble.)
- Christmas, The Redeeming Message ¶23 (He’s leaning against the side of an open door. He turns around and looks you right in the eye and he calls you Father.)
- Nevilles Awakening Birthday At Sir Francis Drake Hotel San Francisco July 20 (The Signs of the End excerpt)
- The True Story of Christmas ¶27 (On the other hand, when David appeared in my world and I was David’s father…and not one moment prior to that event did I ever entertain such a thought.)
- Gods Mystery Christ ¶30 (The revelation came 139 days after my resurrection and birth from above.)
- Whatever You Believe in and Persist in Will Come to Pass ¶2 (thirty years later)
- His To Give Yours To Receive ¶35 (night I knew who I was and who my son was)
- Gods Mystery Christ ¶30 (This, to me, if I’ve given one thing that no one can say that I even saw as a glimpse in a book, it is this revelation that came 139 days after my resurrection and birth from above.)
- God's Son ¶19 (If all of a sudden, one night here in Beverly Hills, sound asleep, my skull explodes. And standing before me as it explodes, and I am sitting at a table, and before me is David—and there is no uncertainty as to who he is.)
- Whatever You Believe in and Persist in Will Come to Pass ¶2 (In 1929, believing Jesus Christ to be another, I stood in His presence. We embraced and I became the infinite love that I beheld, for at that moment I was incorporated intoHis body and became one with the Risen Lord.)
- Whatever You Believe in and Persist in Will Come to Pass ¶2 (Only when my whole being exploded and God’s Son David appeared in the spirit and called me father, did I know my true identity.)
- False Gods ¶37 (He still didn’t know it between his awakening and the birth of the child, which was a sign of his awakening and his birth from above, for 139 days.)
- You Are My Witnesses ¶17 (I who love my daughter Vicki dearly, and I trust my wife implicitly that I did sire that form called Vicki—but the relationship between Vicki and myself, dear as it is, is not as intimate as the relationship between David and myself.)
- He Breaks the Shell ¶15 (Man finds David of Biblical fame and discovers that David’s nature and mission are spiritual, not physical or historical.)
- The Bible Is the Word of God ¶21 (So, all of a sudden, his son comes before me and he calls me “Father.” I look into the eyes of a being that I thought died thousands of years ago, that scripture tells me he’s God’s only son, and his name is David.)
- Life Is a Race ¶19 (Here you see David, this eternal, infinite, beautiful being, and you know he is your son, and he knows you are his father.)
- Season of Advent ¶23 (And I am telling you he has cried unto me, “Thou art my Father” when I stood and I saw him.)
- The Most Precious Gift ¶9
- The Great Secret ¶4 (One day David came out of me. He stood before me and I knew exactly who he was and our relationship with one another, even before he called me father.)
- The Law: Self-Circumcision ¶23 (“Yes, this explosion in my brain, and suddenly standing before me is David of biblical fame, and David calls me ‘my Father.’”)
- Free or Slave ¶31 (How did I know that I am he? Only through the revelation of his Son, David, who in the Spirit called me, Father.)
- Thy Words Were Found ¶49 (And I’m telling you, and I’ve never read it before save in scripture—but I didn’t know it in scripture until I experienced it—that the true Son who reveals man as God the Father is David.)
- The Father and Son ¶19 (I’m speaking from experience, when I stood in the presence of David and he called me Father, this eternal being is calling me Father. And I felt myself the Ancient of Days, the Lord God Jehovah, the father of this wonderful, beautiful being, who is calli…)
- Infinite States ¶16 (We are all brothers, yet after my resurrection and return into unity David (father’s brother) called me Father.)
- Suffering Is Like That of David ¶13 (So when he stood in my presence, he called me Father. It’s the most glorious experience that one could ever experience…to look into the eyes of this heavenly being, without any doubt in your mind that you are looking at your own son.)
- Divine Signs ¶12 (God’s son revealed himself in me, and as I tell it I draw those who will believe me.)
- The Man Within ¶33 (So, in this very body – I don’t mean this body of flesh and blood, but in that Something-Within, I bear, and have borne, the Son of God. He came out and stood before me and called me, “Father.”)
- The Man Within ¶32 (So, in this very body . . I don’t mean this body of flesh and blood, but in that Something-Within, I bear, and have borne, the Son of God. He came out and stood before me and called me, “Father.”)
- Jesus, God's Plan of Salvation ¶33 (And so, I am…when he called me, he didn’t say “Neville is my father,” he called me Father. And I didn’t say, “So Neville is your father,” I said, “I am.”)
- Secret Imagination ¶15 (Well, I’ve found him, and he cried these words to me, and I knew exactly who he was; and I knew then Who-I-Am.)
- The Nature of God ¶11 (And now I tell you that when David stood before me and called me father, I saw him more vividly then I have ever seen anyone here. I can still see his heavenly beauty. I saw David in the year 1959, yet history claims he lived in 1000 B.C.)
- The Man Within (Lecture-2) (Unresolved ASR Witness) ¶30 (Here stands David and he is calling me Father, and I know I am his father; and there is no other way to know that I am God the Father other than his own Son calling me Father.)
- Occupant or Inmate ¶33 (I have seen David…reason tells you it cannot be?)
- Become Like a Child ¶28 (That moment when my brain exploded and I sat watching my son, I had no change of identity, and yet I felt myself to be the Ancient of Days.)
- Seek the Kingdom ¶40 (I thought I was Neville Goddard, born of Joe Goddard, a member of a very large family. Well, physically in this world that’s what I am, but in the world of Spirit I am not; for he gave himself to me, and to prove it his son calls me Father.)
- The Father ¶10 (I have talked to priests, rabbis, ministers, and truth teachers, but none see it, and because of their fixed belief they will not see it.)
- We Are Gods Who Came Down ¶9 (Now that night when I exploded and kept my promise that I would not leave my Son in hell…as you’re told in the 16th Psalm, “Thou wouldst not leave my soul in hell” .)
- The Top Stone ¶8 (And so the day came in my life when it was revealed, and the block was removed, and his son stood before me, and it’s David, of biblical faith.)
- The World Is A Stage ¶24 (As I told him: “Thou art my son” — but I didn’t know I was his father until God gave me himself. I went through hell, then came that moment in time that he kept his promise)
- The Pattern Man ¶19 (I went to bed quite innocently in a normal manner, as I did night after night, and here, this night, my head begins to explode − and you feel you are exploding, and you wonder, “Is this the last moment in time for me?”)
- Advent: The Four Tears ¶17 (The second one is an explosion, a fantastic explosion, and then it comes where you know who you are. That second event reveals who you really are.)
- The Word Of God ¶12 (in 1959 I was... I was born in 1905, so here I am fifty-four years old in the 20th century — it never occurred to me that I had any relationship to David.)
- Signs End July 26 Marines Memorial Club San Francisco ¶14 (there, leaning against the side of an open door and looking out on a pastoral scene, is my son David of Biblical fame. There is David! And there is no uncertainty as to the relationship between David and myself.)
- Gods Purpose ¶20 (I can see the love that poured from me to him as I feasted on the beauty of my son. I can see the feat that he accomplished with that severed head of the enemy of Israel lying before me on a table.)
- Purpose Revealed ¶15 (So, here is David leaning against the side of an open door and looking at me. I have never seen such beauty in my life. David has an unearthly beauty. You can’t describe the beauty of that lad of about 12 or 13.)
Temporal reference