Neville's brother-in-law asks for career help in 1950
Date (happened)
1950
conclusion
Why
dc1-agreement-20261004, pm-actor-551 (PM 8702)
Reasoning
All 2 claims agree on 1950: derived from the event's own title: "Neville's brother-in-law asks for career he; passage:537773.
1950
stated · probable · preferred
Source
derived from the event's own title: "Neville's brother-in-law asks for career help in 1950"
Reasoning
The event held NO date claim of any kind; its own title states 1950 (year precision, parsed as "year only"). ⚠ A title in this corpus is a DERIVED artefact — an earlier pass wrote it from the passage text — so this claim is title-derived and is marked as such rather than cited as a source document; the underlying text remains the real evidence and would supersede it. Confidence `probable`, never `certain`, for that reason. Precision is never inflated beyond the title's own wording. CALIBRATION (run v1.1/l1.4/titledate, against the 489 events that already hold an independent preferred date): day 96.1%, month 94.1% agreement. Titles naming a REFERENCE event rather than the event itself ("before", "after", "during the week of", "per ... lecture") are refused outright and never reach this write — reading an anchor as the date is the same laundering phase3b committed when it wrote telling dates onto events.
1950
stated
Reasoning
The underlying passage directly states the event year, providing stronger evidence than the existing title-derived probable claim.