Plan of salvation shown to Abraham around 2000 BCE
Date (happened)
2000 BC
stated
Reasoning
Passage 540944 explicitly gives '2000 BC' for the event. The BCE era marker is part of the witness and yields year -2000; this correct evidence claim is appended without deleting the earlier refuted +2000 parser-error row.
2000
stated · refuted
Source
derived from the event's own title: "Plan of salvation shown to Abraham around 2000 BCE"
Reasoning
The event held NO date claim of any kind; its own title states 2000 (year precision, parsed as "year only"). ⚠ A title in this corpus is a DERIVED artefact — an earlier pass wrote it from the passage text — so this claim is title-derived and is marked as such rather than cited as a source document; the underlying text remains the real evidence and would supersede it. Confidence `probable`, never `certain`, for that reason. Precision is never inflated beyond the title's own wording. CALIBRATION (run v1.1/l1.4/titledate, against the 489 events that already hold an independent preferred date): day 96.1%, month 94.1% agreement. Titles naming a REFERENCE event rather than the event itself ("before", "after", "during the week of", "per ... lecture") are refused outright and never reach this write — reading an anchor as the date is the same laundering phase3b committed when it wrote telling dates onto events. || v1.1/l1.4/titledate-correct: REFUTED — written in error by my own run v1.1/l1.4/titledate. the title states a BCE date ("Plan of salvation shown to Abraham around 2000 BCE") and my parser ignored the era marker, writing the year as if it were CE — a four-thousand-year error with the evidence sitting in the title. This event held no date before that run, so refuting restores its true prior state (undated) rather than leaving a wrong date on display. The row is kept, not deleted, as the record of what the run did.
Told / reported
10 October 1969
estimated · doubtful
Reasoning
Passage 540944 directly carries the statement in lecture 1487. The carrier's currently preferred delivery claim is 1969-10-10 at doubtful confidence, while the conflicting 1969-10-12 claim is refuted, so the told claim preserves that standing date and confidence.