Neville is called to teach in 1929
Date (happened)
1929
stated · preferred
Why
He distinguishes this 1929 calling from 1938, when lecturing actually began; the two should not be conflated.
Reasoning
Neville directly and unambiguously states the year he was 'sent to teach' as 1929, distinct from 1938 when he 'got underway' (began actually lecturing). This is a stated claim straight off the passage, stronger than the pre-existing title-derived stub, and only year precision is given so month/day are left null.
1929
stated · probable
Source
derived from the event's own title: "Neville is called to teach in 1929"
Reasoning
The event held NO date claim of any kind; its own title states 1929 (year precision, parsed as "year only"). ⚠ A title in this corpus is a DERIVED artefact — an earlier pass wrote it from the passage text — so this claim is title-derived and is marked as such rather than cited as a source document; the underlying text remains the real evidence and would supersede it. Confidence `probable`, never `certain`, for that reason. Precision is never inflated beyond the title's own wording. CALIBRATION (run v1.1/l1.4/titledate, against the 489 events that already hold an independent preferred date): day 96.1%, month 94.1% agreement. Titles naming a REFERENCE event rather than the event itself ("before", "after", "during the week of", "per ... lecture") are refused outright and never reach this write — reading an anchor as the date is the same laundering phase3b committed when it wrote telling dates onto events.